Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • And yes, they state their client is EON and that they can return the debt to EON who can either register a default or take me to court. 
    • Thank you. The npower debt was from 2019/2020 until EON took over the account late 2021.   npower had set a DCA on me even though I owed them nothing. I spoke to a customer service agent, following up by email, who confirmed I was in credit . I made a complaint to head office who sent a barrage of emails, changing the amounts each time. According to them, I owed £279.   The debt grew to what it is now as first npower and then EON subsequently failed to put a payment arrangement and direct debit in place to pay off this supposed sum and my ongoing bills.   I was very ill with Covid, struggling in lockdown with a disabled child and informed them of all this.   EON stopped their legal action when I took them to the ombudsman as this was part of my complaint and requested remedy but I have not received a notice of discontinuance.    I would like to set up my own dd to pay them off but am concerned they could still take legal action. I am on a low income and can’t afford to pay them more than a token amount each month.   
    • Thank you guys! @lookinforinfo thank you for the case, it seem to similar with my case which is gold. @Nicky Boy shouldn't be ICO?   Personal data breaches: a guide ICO.ORG.UK   For CAG I found this  The Confidentiality Advisory Group (CAG) is an independent body which provides expert advice on the use of confidential patient information. This includes providing advice to us, the Health Research Authority (HRA) for research uses. It also provides advice to the Secretary of State for Health for non-research uses.
    • HB - yes I agree it is about their paperwork and advice.  I need to be clear in my head what my complaint is.  And what a result looks like for me? (They should never have placed me with the shark with whom I've had all sorts of issues - but I don't think that's my complaint focus -v-  broker) 
    • HB - all sorts of issues have been in court; the main one re repo remains in court, no resolution.  They all stem really from bad advice by broker.  Indeed, but if the Ombudsman is prepared to accept the complaint, it would be about the advice given by the broker and their paperwork, wouldn't it? You seem to be asserting that the problems you've had stem from their bad advice. HB
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OH's Lewis debenhams card 2009 CCJ/CO - now robbersway chasing


covers22
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1587 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

ok good

I would suggest that interest stopped 18/9/9

 

 

so set the claim to date to that.

 

 

next step.

 

 

you are entitled to 8% stat int on each CISHEET total till today.

 

 

so using 2 copies of the statint spready [one for charges one for PPI

 

 

enter the total from the cisheet into the stat int sheet

as a single figure at the date after the last date of their interest

so 19th sept

 

 

the sheet does the rest

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So just to confirm that i have understood correctly

 

  • fill out one CISHEET for all PPI charges incurred from when i opened the account to when it was assigned to Howard Cohen using 29.9% as the interest rate
  • fill out one CISHEET for all late payment charges incurred from when i opened the account to when it was assigned to Howard Cohen using 29.9% as the interest rate
  • fill out one StatIntSheet the 2 lines (total from each of the above) with the date of charge as 19/09/2009 (day after the assignment to Howard Cohen) using 8% as the interest rate.
  • I can claim back the total of the StatIntSheet?

 

c22

Link to post
Share on other sites

two stat sheets one for each not merged

 

then yes the individual totals from the stat sheets are your claim totals.

  

for the PPI you'll need to fill out:

  

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

 the FOS CQ

 

 dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

i have completed the form but have a couple of queries.

 

the company was GE Money then on later statements that changed to Santander Cards, who do i claim from?

 

What is the process of reclaiming the PPI along with the charges and all the interest. do i luna it all together and write to GE Money or Santander Cards?

 

Thanks

 

c22

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 sep claims

GE money often fob off reclaimers

 

 

try satans bank first.

 

 

so can we see the spreadsheets please?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

looks ok

 

 

you need to do 2 statint sheets

one for each not combined sadly.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hi dx

 

Still need to complete this claim and been manic since xmas.

 

Please can you just confirm,

 

 

do i go direct to Santander card services with these (separately)

 

 

if so are there a template letters to use,

or should i complete the FOS PPI Claim?

do i include the interest?

 

Then what do i do with the charges claim and its interest?

 

 

again is there a template?

 

Thanks in advance.

 

C22

Link to post
Share on other sites

re read the thread first most of the answers are already here.

 

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/publications/technical_notes/ppi.html

 

 

various file attached that will need adapting

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

Hi and apologies if this has been covered before. I have had a search and found something similar but didn't answer my query.

 

Many years ago I got into difficulty with a Debenhams store card debt which ended up in a CCJ being received for the debt in 2009. a number of years went by without being contacted about this and out of the blue earlier this year Robinson Way started chasing the debt.

 

As so much time had passed and the CCJ has dropped off my credit file I sent them a statue barred letter.

 

They have now replied explaining that due the the CCJ order registered on my account in October 2009 that the account is not statute barred and want me to send them my proposal to clear the debt.

 

Does anyone know how I stand legally with this and how I should respond?

 

Many thanks in advance.

 

C22

Link to post
Share on other sites

A CCJ debt cannot become statute barred...

 

An action cannot be brought on any judgment after the expiry of 6 years from the date it became enforceable. The term “action” only applies to the commencement of fresh proceedings on a judgment, it does not include enforcement proceedings so, strictly speaking, for enforcement purposes and enforcement proceedings, no limitation period applies. However, any delay in enforcement on the part of the judgment creditor will affect any award of interest as recoverable interest is limited to 6 years on a judgment that is executed after the expiry of the 6 year period.

Court permission is required to enforce a judgment debt that is more than 6 years old. Further, the court is entitled to take account of delay and enforcement when exercising its discretion to grant any Order sought.

 

DId they also apply for a Charging Order ?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent well dont respond....file.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Lewis debenhams card CCJ/CO

did you and you wife both have debenhams cards then?

there another thread that says they did get a CO?

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On hold from what ?  JUst ignore them file their letters ignore or block their calls.

 

 

And come back here when the court wtite to you to advise you that they have made an application to the court re enforcement purposes......until then ignore.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, dx100uk said:

did you and you wife both have debenhams cards then?

there another thread that says they did get a CO?

 

 

Hi dx 

 

you got me.. I totally forgot that i have sought advice here before on the same thing. (apologies Andy)

 

you are correct it was my wife (easier to say I) they did get a CO and i have been through the PPI claim which they threw out and the FCA agreed with them and also threw out.

 

i have since tried to reclaim on the commission rules but they have come back and offered £47 finial settlement as the amount they overcharged in commission.

 

I'm not sure why they threw out in the first place as my wife was only working part time and wouldn't have been able to claim on the policy anyway.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok merged that thread here..

 

now I will guess that the CO is only in her name on a jointly owned home

if so its a restriction k which is to all intent totally useless to them ever getting any money out of you

so they thought they'll shake the tree and see if she'll bite and start coughing up

as that's the only way they'd ever get any money out of her....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to OH's Lewis debenhams card 2009 CCJ/CO - now robbersway chasing
  • 2 months later...

Hi

 

Robinson Way are still chasing on this saying its not statute barred, but another issue has come to light since submitting a mortgage application.

 

CL Finance have a second charge on the property for this from ~2012, which the mortgage lender want removed before making an offer. CL Finance Limited (Company no. 01108021) was dissolved in October.

 

Does anyone have any advice on how i can have the charge removed and how we can stop Robinson Way chasing.

 

Many thanks

 

Dean

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the same debt?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You cant have 2 judgement s and 2 co's for the same debt.

as said earlier its a restriction k. Joint owned property.. sole debt.

Doesnt need paying in most cases to remortgage?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I was in same situation - sold on debt Robinson Way chasing.  CCJ and Restriction type K still in original creditors name.

 

I had to get the restriction removed to remortgage.  There is no getting away from this.  Believe me i tried everything but all mortgage companies will insist on restriction being removed.  I used money from the remortgage to settle the debt - conveyancing solicitor sorted this out.

 

Remortgaging is really the only time a restriction will cause you an issue.  Its easier to get shot of if your selling and you have a solicitor who understands the process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But only if you remortgage with a new creditor and not the original mortgagee

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...