Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

OH's Lewis debenhams card 2009 CCJ/CO - now robbersway chasing


covers22
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1597 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, Hopefully someone can help with this..

 

My wife took out a debenhams card back in 2005

 

 

due to difficult circumstances in 2008 she defaulted on the account.

this lead to eventually having a CCJ registered against her and a charge put on the property in October 2009.

 

i have all the paperwork for this including the original agreement she signed in store, default notice court claim form the works.

 

we are in a better position now and would like to know what would be the best outcome for resolving this? The CCJ is for just over £2k

 

The ideal outcome would be to get the charge removed removed from the property,

the CCJ removed from the credit file and a chunk if not all of the outstanding balance written off but that maybe too optimistic.

 

any advice would be welcomed.

 

Thanks in advance

 

Covers22

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCJs remain for 6 years from date of inception. Sadly you wouldnt get rid of it per-se but if you pay it you could get it Satisfied.

Getting a charge removed is certainly possible. Have you checked for PPI etc and Charges? These are all reclaimable from the original creditor :)

 

How much can you afford monthly?

Also did you challenge and defend when you received the court papers?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In answer to what we can afford monthly and the defence at the time.

 

We could probably just about to scrape enough together to pay it off

(that would be using available credit cards as well) if that meant

 

 

we could negotiate removing the CCJ from the file otherwise we could do £200 a month max to get it cleared.

 

We naively didn't challenge and defend at the time, we hoped it would go away it wasn't a good time financially.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the CCJ will VANISH on its 6th birthday PAID OR NOT

 

 

the CO is a different matter

 

 

whos the name against to CO

 

 

wont be DB's

it'll be a debt buyer.

 

 

PPI reclaim FIRST that's for sure!!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Awesome penalty charges and PPI! Reclaim it all !

It will bring the balance down! :)

 

Yep the Charging order is a different matter as DX said

Do not pay credit with credit... Itll sting you in the long run.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

the CCJ will VANISH on its 6th birthday PAID OR NOT

 

 

the CO is a different matter

 

 

whos the name against to CO

 

 

wont be DB's

it'll be a debt buyer.

 

 

PPI reclaim FIRST that's for sure!!

 

 

dx

 

I has a question for you DX...

 

IF PPI and Penalty fees are reclaimed and the debt is wiped. Does it make the CO not valid any more? Technically there is less debt on this?

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice, i will start with reclaiming the PPI and charges and see what is left to clear.

 

Can PPI and charges be reclaimed on the same claim? if so can anyone recommend a thread where the process is explained?

 

c22

Link to post
Share on other sites

the reclaims will be against the original creditor

 

 

so the money will goto you.

 

 

you then use that to pay the CO off to whomever is NAMED on land registry?

 

 

have you checked who it is?

 

 

reclaiming is EASY if you have ALL the statements?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Lewis Group on behalf of CL Finance is named on the land registry and GE Money ran the Debenhams card at the time.

 

I have totted up the PPI and late charges which equate to over £1200 and @ 8% APR (is this correct) the interest is over £800 so once reclaimed i shouldn't have to add much to settle.

 

c22

Link to post
Share on other sites

if it was a credit card

 

 

then use TWO copies of the CISHEET :

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

 

 

are you aware of the date they stopped interest at their rate?

 

 

one copy - for every PPI payment - put their int rate in cell d 15

 

 

another copy: for the PENALTY charges.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

passed or sold to a DCA?

did you receive a notice of assignment.?

 

 

it should be possible to findout when interest was stopped via the statements?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh great so cohen has not ever sent a statement since

that's against FCA guidelines for a start!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have received a few sporadic statements from CL Finance since the CCJ was lodged. but these have the balance and court & solicitors costs only and some £1 charges for letters.

 

I have also received another notice of assignment in march this year from Hoist Portfolio Holding Limited (Robinson Way Limited) but no further correspondence.

 

c22

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok well cl/hoist/robbers are all the same lot

under H2HP2 holdings ltd.

 

 

is int still being charge on the last 2007 ge statement

though surely there must be ones till the CCJ mind you have not got?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interest was being charged on this account until September 2009 which is the last Debenhams statement I have. We cancelled the ppi on this in June 2007 and still used the account until we had difficulties in 2009 when we could no longer afford to pay and we got a default and the account was passed to the DCA.

 

C22

Link to post
Share on other sites

then I'd suggest an sar to the oc.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri original creditor

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would the SAR give me any additional detail, i have all the original statements and i'm sure all of the letters.

 

I have looked through the paperwork again and the last interest i was charged was on 8th September 2009 to to summerise

 

  • The account was opened December 2004
  • The Account cover (PPI) was cancelled by us in June 2007
  • The account was run until and was passed to the DCA in October 2009
  • The last interest charged was in September 2009
  • The interesticon rate on the account was 29.9% APR

 

i have filled out 2 copies of the CISHEET as advised but am unsure of what to and from dates to use and what interest rate to enter for each (PPI and Charges)

 

regards

 

c22

Link to post
Share on other sites

the int will be as you state 29.9

 

 

you need to be SURE when interest was charged till

 

 

you say you have all the letters

you say it was passed to a dca.

so it was not SOLD?, and you did not get a notice of assignment around that date?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, missed an important document

 

  • The account was opened December 2004
  • The Account cover (PPIicon) was cancelled by us in June 2007
  • The last interest charged was in September 2009
  • I have a Notice of Assignment from Howard Cohen dated 18th September 2009

 

c22

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...