Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses."    
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
    • We both sent our completed N181 form to the court and claimants solicitors. We haven't received anything from the solicitors yet but perhaps we will today. How are directions agreed ? Does the claimant file proposed directions with their Directions Questionnaire ? I will update once anything is received from the solicitors.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Remove Minicredit/OPOS unenforceable charges?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3410 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm writing on behalf of my partner who took out a loan with Minicredit 2012/2013.

 

After receiving all the usual threatening letters and the ridiculous charges that was added by Minicredit/OPOS, he set up a DMP with Step Change giving the outstanding balance of the debt at approx £700+.

 

Now, having read these forums it is very clear that the charges added are unenforceable.

 

He emailed OPOS asking for an up to date balance and a full break down of the debt.

 

The reply..

 

Balance : £240.33

 

Principal : £100

Interest : £85.00

Penalty 1 : £25.00

Penalty 2 : £55.00

Attempt Fee : £380.00

Debt Collection Fee : £100

 

I believe I am correct in stating that only the principal loan, the one months interest and a single penalty fee is what is actually owed which would equal £210.

 

He has already paid to date £58.87 through his DMP so therefore he owes £151.13 now.

 

I have no idea where the £240.33 has come from, probably Derek falling on his calculator?

 

Am I correct? How on earth do I go about getting OPOS to remove the unenforceable charges? An email template would be perfect.

Edited by RosePetalBeauty
Link to post
Share on other sites

The only enforceable amounts there are :

 

Principal : £100

interest: £85.00

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

They cant chargeable of those as they are penalty charges and must reflect the costs of actions incurred

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone help me out with a template email/letter or the wording as to prove the charges are unlawful?

 

My partner really wants to resolve this issue and judging by the view count on this thread so far, many others need this advice too.

 

Thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My partner has been in contact with OPOS who agreed that the charges were extremely high but they said they could not adjust the balance without the authorisation from Mini Credit, as they themselves do no add charges/interest, just collect the debt.

 

After contacting Mini Credit we found out the account had been recently sold to OPOS so they are now the legal owners so Mini Credit cannot adjust the balance. However, OPOS can because they have taken over the same rights and responsibilities of the original owners.

 

We provided this information to OPOS and the dispute in balance is being investigated by the Financial Manager and Derek's manager.

 

The FCA handbook has been very useful, although somewhat tricky to navigate, to find out what rights my partner and OPOS have.

 

It would be really helpful if anyone can give us some advice on what next steps to take? And are we correct in the way we are going?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also had a payday loan with Minicredit, also sold on to Opos. Reading other threads I believe they are all part of the same company. My original loan was £100, but the balance shown on my credit file was £831 I emailed Minicredit stating this:

 

 

I believe this loan should never have been issued due to affordability checks not being undertaken. As such, I would like to make a formal complaint. The resolution I would like to take place is as follows:

 

  1. All outstanding debts cleared from the account.
  2. The default removed from my credit file.

I note that you are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and, in result of a deadlock letter being issued, I am able to refer this complaint to the Financial Ombudsman. I would appreciate it if you could send me full details of your complaints procedure.

 

I got a reply stating that "As a goodwill gesture we are willing to write off the outstanding balance however the default will remain on Your credit file and will be marked "satisfied". " After further correspondence they agreed to completely remove the loan from my credit file including the default. I have checked and this has been done.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is great! Well done for getting them to wipe the outstanding balance and remove the loan from your credit file.

 

Can I ask, did you repay any of the loan? Without knowing, I am thinking that you could have already paid the principal loan and agreed interest off? Therefore their goodwill gesture was actually writing off the unenforceable and unlawful penalty charges.

 

What grounds did you believe the loan to be unaffordable? When my partner was took out this loan, he already had a Wonga loan where he was failing to meet a repayment plan, probably other payday loans and a mobile phone contract that had been defaulted on which was being passed from one DCA to the next. His take home pay was approx £900 per month. Is this enough reason for them to be considered irresponsible lenders?

 

We will wait from a reply from OPOS, hopefully by the end of the week, then may very well take this route if Mini Credit have irresponsibly given out a loan they know would not be repaid back on time, knowing they could exploit charges etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had not repaid anything on this loan. I had loans for 3 or 4 months from them, repaying each and taking another. I also was doing the same with multiple payday loan companies.

I think it was unaffordable on the basis I was repeatedly taking loans from them and the other lenders. I don't believe they could have carried out any form of credit check and they have not provided any proof that they did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your response.

 

Do you think my partner has grounds to state the loan was unaffordable? If they had carried out credit checks his file would have flagged up with the info I previously said. This was the first loan with Mini Credit he ever took out.

 

He isn't trying to diminish his responsibility at taking out the loan, he did and he was stupidly desperate but had Mini Credit been responsible lenders they should have refused his application.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can only suggest he tries. I was in a situation where I defaulted on several debts in 2009 and all were recorded on my credit file. I did nothing to help myself and resolve the situation and made it worse by taking out multiple payday loans in 2011. If they had carried out any form of affordability or credit check, I should have been refused further credit.

 

 

I am now taking control and sorting out all my debts. I was not expecting them to just write off the debt and was prepared to negotiate, but there was no way I was going to accept over £700 in charges for a £100 loan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I couldn't agree with you more, it is far too easy to get yourself into a situation that spirals and often people bury their head in the sand because it seems so out of your control. But having found forums like CAG, you regain some control and can tackle the debts you've got into. It is definitely a lesson learned.

 

Like you, we are prepared to negotiate and are willing to repay what we borrowed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I have been off the radar for a while (although some might think that's a good thing)

 

TBH i would stop paying them at all , if you do want a full and final that is the only way you will get them to talk. I have refused to pay a bean because they have added extortionate charges and in 2 years have heard nothing

Please remember that only a court can say a charge in unenforceable although I would say that any defence should be quite easy

 

It does seem that many PDL's are now writing off old debts, especially for those that would be classed as vulnerable

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with step change (and other DM companies is that they do not challenge charges and personally I have to wonder why?

 

I wasn't talking about immediate payments and it all depends how much he is paying a month, however whatever works for him.

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never really thought about that, I suppose they just act as the middle man and make things that little bit easier for the debtor. I know myself and my partner are really grateful of their help. They are a charity so we don't pay them a fee, our bank accounts are secure, we see our money being distributed and the numbers coming down, we aren't hounded by any creditor/DCA either.

 

For a full and final settlement, it would take an awful lot of missed payments - approx a year - for him to save the money for that. Also, I'm not sure how Step Change and other creditors would feel about that.

 

we require OPOS Ltd to remove the ulawful charges and penalties from the outstanding balance. I'm certain I read in the FCA handbook that they cannot add penalties on when a debtor is in financial hardship. Since OPOS are now the legal owners of the debt, they have the same rights and responsibilities as Mini Credit did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a DCA holds the debt, as long as its not a overdraft or current account, CCA them. If they cannot provide a compliant CCA within the statutory timeframe, tell your DMP to withold payments until such a time they produce one. Sadly some DMP's dont check the validity of the debt. They just go by what you or the Creditor says.

 

Meanwhile, pay them as per your agreement, so they cannot say you defaulted on a repayment plan.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I said. My view is whatever works for you. I was in a dmp for a few years and it was worth its weight in hold. My understanding is that whatever your circumstances they can add fees however enforcing them is a different matter. I fear that while uou continue to pay you will get little help. Sorry

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't that just so ridiculous and sad. I'm not getting at you here but just that point in general. I'll keep in mind your views about withholding payments whilst the account is in dispute.

 

After Monday OPOS will have had 5 business days to reply with an update or outcome of their 'investigation'. Depending on their reply, and if they actually do reply then we will be making a formal complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always like formal complaints because after 56 days you can go to the fos. All i will suggest is be specific about what is wrong and what you want doing. If for example it is irresponsible lending then say so. Discredit clearly did not do any affordability checks on me. I said i was single and on disability benefits then they accused me of fraud when i said i wasn't working and my wife had died. We had been separated for 10 years but not divorced. I wasn't working because i was on disability benefits

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...