Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Although, any individual in a similar position should decide for themselves what they think is an appropriate course of action. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Derby Car Centre Ltd/Pride Park - Vehicle Not Fit For Purpose***Judgment/paid in Full***


Laura Cooke
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2912 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Asking on behalf of a relative who does not have the internet

 

bought a 2005 4x4 vehicle 31-10-14 from garage in Derby

 

they delivered it 3-11-14 paid £2,700 for it and was given £300 for his vehicle

it came with a months warranty,

 

relative kept hearing a noise

 

7-10 days after sale he went to a local garage with it on 18-11-14

after keep ringing the garage he bought if from and

keep being fobbed off when asking to speak to the manager.

 

Local garage booked car in to have a look at it 24-11-14 and

made a report it has a constant light on dash board for the air bag,

gear box on its way out flooded with oil,

clutch going,

brakes faulty/sticking,

car differential problems.

 

Whenever relative keeps ringing garage he bought vehicle from

he gets fobbed off they told him to bring vehicle back

but car is not roadworthy according to local garage that as inspected it.

 

Rang consumer direct

they said to keep ringing garage and demand to speak to the manager

and tell him want a full refund as they have sold him vehicle that is not fit for purpose

and that he does not want a replacement etc

 

relative cannot get this far with only speaking to sales team,

not been advised to write to them.

 

Advice what to do to secure a refund and to get garage to come and collect this vehicle,

relative now as no vehicle for work and will have to go out this week and buy another vehicle.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 260
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

think they will need to write to the garage,

send recorded,

saying what issues are there with the car,

enclose a copy of the report from the local garage,

 

 

i think they will need to give the garage 2 options, repair or refund,

they will need to set a deadline from delivery of the letter (example 14 days)

failing to deal with will bring a claim in the small claims...

 

sale of goods act is your friend here

also have a read of http://www.norfolk.gov.uk/view/NCC094699

 

hope that helps...i am sure others will be here shortly to add/ confirm and clarify

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot

 

Consumers Direct said there was 3 options

 

relative does not trust them to carry out repairs just mask them

they neither want a replacement vehicle either because they said they do not trust them to sell them a road worthy car,

 

they want a full refund,

 

been reading reviews from other disatisfied customers

 

they do not make tasteful reading this company is shocking shame they did not read the reviews prior to buying.

 

Got the Directors name off internet tonight

 

is it worth trying to shame him?

 

as it is obvious the selling team is fobbing relative off the manager is never available and as not returned any calls.

 

Will send letter is 7 or 14 days have to allow them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rang consumer direct

they said to keep ringing garage and demand to speak to the manager

and tell him want a full refund as they have sold him vehicle that is not fit for purpose

and that he does not want a replacement etc

 

 

Consumer direct have got that wrong. A rejection 'must' be done by letter or it can be completely ignored unless the seller says he is happy to do it verbally. Send your letter of rejection by recorded delivery.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent letter by recorded delivery stating vehicle is not roadworthy and listed the faults along with independent report from local garage stating condition of the vehicle, telling them they had 14 days to respond, someone rang day after and told relative to return vehicle to the garage for repair, relative stated vehicle parked up as not road worthy and that they wanted full refund that they had not faith in them to repair the vehicle and as the vehicle was delivered to relative from Derby that they should come and collect it back and take it back there and give full refund not heard anything since

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understand what you are saying thanks, wrote to person who had vehicle previously, she sold the vehicle to buy a car.com this year this is not the garage who my brother in law purchased it from the previous owner said the air bag light was on when she had the vehicle and it had the gear box problem too, so the garage never carried out these repairs before selling it again.

 

Hope it does not go as far as the courts but yes prepared to go that far, Trading Standards rang Friday and said they hope the garage sees sense as they keen to see them shut down they say they ae inundated with complaints

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with this type of outfit is that when things start to become a problem, they just dissolve it along with all the problems and debts and then start again under another name. You would be wise to check out the owners personal details so if it comes to it you can name both the company and the owner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I got the directors name and judging by the feedback off other customers and checking out their background they are very bad and do change the business name and go under, Trading Standards said they want to shut them down.

 

The company is Derby Car Centre Ltd the directors address is listed as Pride Park Derby sent letter to him and head office and the garage the vehicle was purchased from.

 

 

Brother in law purchased it blindly after seeing it on line he purchased it without inspecting it or anything they delivered it and took is old vehicle away in part exchange which had not test as it was in a shocking state needing an enormous amount of welding which my brother in law made them aware of 3 days later the vehicle was sold to another company for around £1,700 no way could it have gone out with the work done and a full mot. I also said the mistake was made by paying cash something I never do

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem TS have is they cannot shut them down, all they can do is speed up their demise and reincarnation as a new business. The law in this country is an ass, it allows anyone to start a business, rake up debts, sometimes into the millions, and then just close the company having paid not a penny from the debt and call themselves something else, open up and do it all over again.

Any business owner who dissolves a company should be stopped from holding a directorship or being a proprietor for 5 years. I know they will probably just hand it over to the misses or a friend for a few quid, but it would be a start.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally agree why should innocent people suffer because of these people law needs changing bought a lap top a few years ago it proved faulty shop did a moonlighter and declared himself bankrupt then started up somewhere else even holding on to repairs from the last business not right at all

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Advice greatly appreciated company ignored all correspondence and calls keep going to voice mail, relative as asked if I can sort out a small claims filling it in on line I have put in the date money owed from put this as the date purchased then it says date you issued claim put 12th of this month down now you have to put in claim amount will this include the price of the vehicle, the cost of storing it, the cost of interest added on and the court fee? then what amount of interest do I put in as the daily rate up to date of judgement?

 

After you type up a short statement underneath is amount claimed is this figure same as the one you put at the top of the claim it maybe that the court fee is calculated automatically so no need to add it to the amount claimed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Laura, I have moved you over to the legal forums as you are considering issuing a claim (and amended your thread title to reflect this) . Purely an administrative move, but you should see some help soon :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here you go..

 

 

The MCOL system takes you through each stage....you need to make the claim particulars short and concise (then issue separate in depth particulars manually)this must be worded in the particulars.......Interest is applied at 8%...again that is done for you by Northampton but again you needs to include the wording in your particulars...court fees are added separately...not in the claim amount..but the grand total amount

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Needing advice please to do a small claims on line partially filled it in but no idea how much to put in as total as it as racked up with vehicle having been in storage at £9 a day from November till May 2015. Trading Standards have not been too helpful they have visited the garage many times and all they can say is take it to the small claims, the vehicle was collected back in May and the garage as not been in touch last thing they said was "When we sell it we will refund minus the storage costs as we do not agree to them and minus any depreciation in the vehicle"

Link to post
Share on other sites

You claim for the full amount you paid for the car and for the other garage to look at it and give you a report they charged for that exam.

 

With the seller saying what he has, you need to get this claim in as soon as possible.

 

Trading Standards only acts on the behalf of consumers in general and not individuals. If enough complaints are receive about a business, they will then go and take a look. Complete waste of time if you ask me. They are more interested in visiting shops to see if they are selling tobacco brought in from France.

 

This car would have been bought at auction so even though the buyer gets a chance to examine, they can't take it for a drive, that is the chance they take at auction, but once owned by them, they have every chance to test drive it. These type of garages are not interested in repairing faults, that cuts into their profits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Relative owns the vehicle it was purchased November 2014 became faulty told garage to fetch it back sent official letters both ignored purchased a replacement vehicle so no tax or insurance on faulty vehicle sent garage an independent inspection report and told them to collect vehicle as it would have to go in storage due to nowhere to park it with having no tax insurance on it. Garage kept ignoring emails, phone calls and stalled stating they had not received letters, or inspection report etc though everything was sent recorded delivery and signed for. Vehicle was eventaully collected in May this year and they have never been in touch to say what is happeneing we managed to get in touch briefly and they said if and when they sell the vehicle they will refund minus any depreciation and minus the storage costs of which they refuse to pay as they state permission should have been sort to have placed it in storage

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...