Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Halfords' incompetence and lack of ethics professionalism


Shanidev
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3286 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Just over 2 years ago I had a breakdown on my car and called the AA. Luckily I was in slow moving traffic. AA diagnosed it to be broken Auxiliary Belt. Their recommended repairer is Halfords Auto Centres. So, the car was taken there and fiasco started.

 

They diagnosed it as auxiliary belt broken. So, far so good. A day later they asked if they could do the service as this is due. I said OK. Another day later, they called back saying radiator, then expansion tank and then something else needed replacing. Again, I said OK. Then a few days later, I phoned for update and the guy said all is fixed and the mechanic has taken it for a test drive. Then I had a call from them saying the car is blowing white smoke and coolant is leaking.

 

'It is probably the head gasket.'

 

At this point I got annoyed and asked if they had done any pressure test on oil and coolant system. To which their guy replied

 

'No, we didn't have to because coolant was gushing out as we were pouring in'

 

'Then why did you do the service and why did you take out for a test drive', to which he had no answer.

 

Anyway, 3 months later we had a call to say the car was ready. We collected the car and the manager said 'We burnt our hands on this one; we can repair fords and vauxhalls but BMW! is a different game.

 

The car came back with service clock not set, heater not working and oil and coolant leaks.

 

To cut the story short, the car has spent most of the time (80~90%) with Halfords. Over the 2 years, each time it has gone back to them it has come with another fault but the original fault still not fixed. This time it went in and a month later came back, on Recovery Vehicle' with 'Tell Tale light' coming on and car entering into limp mode. So, I sent it back and 2 weeks later they delivered, supposedly fixed, on a Recovery Vehicle still with the same fault. Again I sent it back. Nearly another month later they delivered it back to me. This problem was fixed and after being driven for just under 100 miles the same fault is back.

 

I contacted them and they came back saying they will replace the component that they changed as it will be under warranty but if any other component is causing this fault we would have to pay.

 

I maintain that their diagnostics testing was not thorough and I want them to have the car fully diagnosed by BMW because I don't want to have to wait for another year to see if they can fix it.. I emailed their Customer Services over 2 weeks ago but so far have heard nothing.

 

Does anybody know who I can write or what I can do to get some action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Sorry you were missed.

 

You could email the big boss.

 

[email protected]

 

OR

 

go via snail mail.

 

Mr Matthew davies

Halfords Ltd.

 

ICKNIELD STREET DRIVE

WASHFORD WEST

REDDITCH

WORCESTERSHIRE

B98 0DE

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

'We burnt our hands on this one; we can repair fords and vauxhalls but BMW! is a different game

 

 

What a load of bull. There is no car on this planet that is any different to another except in the name. If you can repair one car you can repair any.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I disagree. I think what you say is true about the basics for most cars, but onboard computers and electronics etc... have totally changed the ability of many to do all maintenance on their own cars.

 

A basic service is within the ability of most who want to learn how to do it.

 

In this case it sounds like they made a total cock up of things, but I suspect problems described may have stemmed from the belt needing replacing in the first place. It depends on the make and model of car as to what else could have been damaged when the belt went.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not about a home service, it's about Halfords doing a service and getting it wrong. If a company is going to promote itself as a service center, they should have all the equipment to fulfil that task or make it plain that certain cars are excepted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a load of bull. There is no car on this planet that is any different to another except in the name. If you can repair one car you can repair any.

 

This is the comment to which my comment was directed, and I believe I was right to disagree. If you can repair one, it is not the case you can repair any.

 

It's not about a home service, it's about Halfords doing a service and getting it wrong. If a company is going to promote itself as a service center, they should have all the equipment to fulfil that task or make it plain that certain cars are excepted.

 

Home service was mentioned in relation to your comment that if you can repair one you can repair any. With basics, there is an element of truth, but when you go beyond basics nowadays, things quickly go beyond the abilities of a keen amateur. Purely my view of course. :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, lets change that to how it actually is 'I' can repair any car, to me they are all the same and I've done everything on the road, so now there can be no doubt.

 

Very modest! :-D Fancy a test then? I honestly do not believe you have done 'everything on the road' nor that you can repair any car. You may be an excellent mechanic, though TBH, an excellent mechanic would know they cannot repair 'ANY' car.

 

Let's get back to helping the OP anyway. In-house niggles won't help anything! :wink:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Likewise Conniff. I have never come across a car I could not repair and up for the challenge. The difference being you and I would be able to tell why it had gone wrong. And that's the difference these days.

Fixing cars now is more understanding why rather than what, that's how it's done. And if you understand why it's just a formality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

local place near us specialises in "brakes and discs"

 

friend asked them to diag a miss firing problem, they wanted to fit coils at £240, £8 set of plugs later fitted at home and its fine

 

i have to admit im no mechanic but ill try everything short of engine rebuilds, and do my own welding

Please note:

 

  • I am employed in the IT sector of a high street retail chain but am not posting in any official capacity,so therefore any comments,suggestions or opinions are expressly personal ones and should not be viewed as an endorsement or with agreement of any company.
  • i am not legal trained in any form.
  • I have many experiences in life and do often use these in my posts

if ive been helpful kick my scales, if ive been unhelpful kick the scales of the person more helpful :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Likewise Conniff. I have never come across a car I could not repair and up for the challenge. The difference being you and I would be able to tell why it had gone wrong. And that's the difference these days.

Fixing cars now is more understanding why rather than what, that's how it's done. And if you understand why it's just a formality.

 

Try fixing an Audi A8 63 plate misfiring.

My neighbour has had it in and out of a dozen Audi specialist and main dealers for a year without joy.

They're now talking about sending the car to Germany.

New cars are not repairable by a very good mechanic because one stupid disconnected wire affects 200 other things.

And that's why I treasure my 1998 passat that i can fix and maintain myself

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try fixing an Audi A8 63 plate misfiring.

My neighbour has had it in and out of a dozen Audi specialist and main dealers for a year without joy.

They're now talking about sending the car to Germany.

New cars are not repairable by a very good mechanic because one stupid disconnected wire affects 200 other things.

And that's why I treasure my 1998 passat that i can fix and maintain myself

 

 

This is because they have no idea what they are doing. Most, as they call themselves now, technicians can only look at a laptop screen, see a number and look it up in the book doh, it more than fingers I got so I don't know what's wrong.

 

 

There is no difference in todays cars than fifty years ago, they just have a few more bits added. It's the same now as it's always been, work your way through in a methodical manner and eliminate. There is nothing simpler. If a wire is disconnected, then reconnect it, simples, as a certain Meerkat would say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

T

 

There is no difference in todays cars than fifty years ago, they just have a few more bits added. It's the same now as it's always been, work your way through in a methodical manner and eliminate. There is nothing simpler. If a wire is disconnected, then reconnect it, simples, as a certain Meerkat would say.

 

It's a bit more complicated than that. These extra units aren't just added and connected up with a few wires, they are added and integrated into the system. In the old days when you operated a switch, it made/broke an electrical circuit, now when you operate a switch it sends a signal to a black box full of integrated circuits, transistors, and micro chips which analyses the signal and sends it to the relevant actuator.

 

There's miles more wiring in a modern car, which is one of the first things fitted when the car is made, which means that it can be quite inaccessible, in some cases it can pick up interference from outside sources which can cause a car to behave in strange ways, something that you didn't get with a set of points.

 

In the Audi example above you could spend hours looking at the 100 or so wires that plug into the ECU in an attempt to find a faulty one, and who is going to authorise or pay for that time?, when you only suspect as a possibility a wiring fault, it could be a fault with a surface mounted integrared circuit component within an ECU.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good heavens, transistors! whatever next, wheels with pump up tyres?

 

 

Lol...along with Petrol and Diesel.

 

 

Seriously, if you know what you are doing and how to use the systems available it's still not advanced quantum physics is it?

 

 

Simple checks such as spark discharge patterns, cylinder pressure checks, fuel pressure checks along with basic measurements and an understanding of what the results mean is all that is needed and you don't need high tech equipment to do it.

 

 

Quite pathetic really but perhaps a sad reflection on how the traditional apprentice system was systematically destroyed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WHen it comes to black boxes, thats where software exists to wipe and reprogram. As stated, you can easily fix any mechanical problem, and refit wiring. The box simply hooks up to a system with the correct software, and you basically reset the car, then retune it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reading the timeline on this as in your original post:

 

 

They diagnosed it as auxiliary belt broken. So, far so good. A day later they asked if they could do the service as this is due. I said OK. Another day later, they called back saying radiator, then expansion tank and then something else needed replacing. Again, I said OK. Then a few days later, I phoned for update and the guy said all is fixed and the mechanic has taken it for a test drive. Then I had a call from them saying the car is blowing white smoke and coolant is leaking.

 

  1. Confirmed auxiliary belt broken.
  2. Service was due and advised.
  3. Found a problem with the radiator and/or the expansion bottle.
  4. All fixed
  5. Out for a test drive
  6. White smoke from exhaust and water loss.

A problem with the cooling system can easily mask a head gasket that is about to be breached so when replaced it caused the weak spot to finally give way.

 

 

This isn't really a fault of Halfords.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

As a qualified mechanic of over 40 years myself, I have to disagree with you slightly on point 2 Conniff. I would have replaced the drive belt, cured the coolant leak and then test drove the car to ensure that the cooling system was functioning normally. If it was all o/k, I would then have serviced the rest of the car to finish off the job. No point in servicing a car with a blown head gasket. Other than that, I agree with all your previous posts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would seem that they didn't know it had a coolant leak until after all the work was done and on a test drive.

 

 

They diagnosed it as auxiliary belt broken. So, far so good. A day later they asked if they could do the service as this is due. I said OK. Another day later, they called back saying radiator, then expansion tank and then something else needed replacing. Again, I said OK. Then a few days later, I phoned for update and the guy said all is fixed and the mechanic has taken it for a test drive. Then I had a call from them saying the car is blowing white smoke and coolant is leaking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...