Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Eurido again.... Can I claim for time wasted?


axil23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3428 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Looks like they can advise the credit agencies....

 

Who has them? Those who started higher education between 1990 and 1997.

 

Loan type: Old style "Mortgage" type Current interest rate: 2.5%

 

How the interest rate is set: It is set for a year every September based on the rate of RPI inflation the previous March - though the actual rate is only officially confirmed each August. (If you're new to interest rates see our Interest Rates Beginners Guide).

 

Number of outstanding loans: 300,000 (at April 2014)

 

How you repay: You must make repayments if you earn over £26,727 per year - though you can pay before that, if you wish to.

 

How you actually pay it: You are responsible for paying it directly to the Student Loans Company, by direct debit, card, or cheque. See full details on Student Loans Company payment page.

 

The impact on credit files: While having the loan itself doesn't impact your score, it can have a substantial impact if you're a late payer or miss a repayment.

 

The Student Loans Company will write to all late payers, giving 28 days to make contact or it will go on your credit file (see the Credit Rating guide).

 

Can I defer payment? Yes, if you earn under £26,727. You need to write to SLC (or the debt management company administering your loan) once a year to do so, supplying particular documents - see Student Loans Company for details

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are panicking about nothing.

 

 

nowhere does it say they 'will' or evidence they have.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are panicking about nothing.

 

 

nowhere does it say they 'will' or evidence they have.

 

 

dx

 

You are right. I have A1 credit so really don't want any stamps on it. The link above your post from the slc website states that pre 1998 loans can be reported.

Link to post
Share on other sites

but only within limited criteria.

 

 

there are no reports of these being actually reported.

 

 

with drill thru 31 post

 

 

have you signed that rodeo deferment form and ever sent it back?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

theres your problem then.

 

 

you've signed your rights away.

 

 

now its a game is chess with them.

 

 

did you copy their deferment form before you sent it back?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

theres your problem then.

 

 

you've signed your rights away.

 

 

now its a game is chess with them.

 

 

did you copy their deferment form before you sent it back?

 

 

dx

 

No I did not. I honestly didn't realise they would be such a bunch of crooks. Shall I just start to pay it back?

Link to post
Share on other sites

need to see a copy of the BLANK Erudio deferment form

its here or on mumsnet somewhere

but I cant find it.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

[ATTACH=CONFIG]54693[/ATTACH]

 

:yo:

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do they keep stating

if you borrowed from us we may ...[when no-one has borrowed ANYTHING from Arrows.

 

 

and the killer......

 

 

consent to share data on up to date account opened in or after 1998

 

 

surely anyone that has a SLC loan sold to them were ALL before that data.....

 

 

or

 

 

are they implementing a clever play on words here

 

 

by 'account' they simply mean the fact 'the debtor is 'with' Erudio

so whatever info they hold they can register...

 

 

urm wonder what they authorities will say about that ambiguous statement?

 

 

me think they can never register ANYTHING about the old loans the have AT ALL...

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do they keep stating

if you borrowed from us we may ...[when no-one has borrowed ANYTHING from Arrows.

 

 

and the killer......

 

 

consent to share data on up to date account opened in or after 1998

 

 

surely anyone that has a SLC loan sold to them were ALL before that data.....

 

 

or

 

 

are they implementing a clever play on words here

by 'account' they simply mean the fact 'the debtor is 'with' Erudio

so whatever info they hold they can register...

 

 

urm wonder what they authorities will say about that ambiguous statement?

 

 

me think they can never register ANYTHING about the old loans the have AT ALL...

 

 

dx

 

It looks like Erudio have shot themselves in the foot, as all these loans are PRE 1998, if the official as in a tested in court view is that the loans are all prior to the date stated, then signing the form gives Erusdio NO permission either explicit or implied to give information to a CRA or anyone else.

 

It could be that Erudio think that by signing their dodgy deferment form it somehow converts the loan to a POST 1998 income contingent one. so allowing them to apply the lower threshold of £16.9K or so for deferment purposes rather than the £28.7K, reduced to £26.7K from September (see: http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/news/loans/2014/08/student-loan-deferment-threshold-to-fall-qa-on-why-its-happening )

 

They would probably try that wheeze a couple of years down the line, after all their "customers" have signed the dodgy deferments, and they think they can get away with it

 

Or it could be that they as you say DX are trying to be clever. Whatever this needs looking at. Another angle could be that Escrewdio are anticipating buying up some post 1998 loans in the near future. What aren't you telling us Gideon Osborne?

 

With any luck this could bite them on the bum.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

why do they keep stating

if you borrowed from us we may ...[when no-one has borrowed ANYTHING from Arrows.

 

 

and the killer......

 

 

consent to share data on up to date account opened in or after 1998

 

 

surely anyone that has a SLC loan sold to them were ALL before that data.....

 

 

or

 

 

are they implementing a clever play on words here

 

 

by 'account' they simply mean the fact 'the debtor is 'with' Erudio

so whatever info they hold they can register...

 

 

urm wonder what they authorities will say about that ambiguous statement?

 

 

me think they can never register ANYTHING about the old loans the have AT ALL...

 

 

dx

 

Mine was opened in 1996. But haven't the pre 1998 account holders consented all ready http://www.slc.co.uk/media/758479/fo...onse_76-14.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

link is dead?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

link is dead?

 

 

dx

 

This is what it says. Link http://www.slc.co.uk/media/758479/foi_response_76-14.pdf

 

Request Reference: 76-14

Date of Response: 06/05/2014

Request

“A copy of the conditions associated with student loans taken between 1995 and 1998 (under

the Education (Student Loans) Act 1990). In particular I wish to understand the provision that

was either made at the time, or has subsequently been made, to pass information regarding

student loans to Credit Reference Agencies and how this was highlighted to loan applicants.”

Response

I can confirm that the information you have requested is held by the Student Loans Company

Limited (“SLC”).

Student loans taken out between 1995 and 1998 under the Education (Student Loans) Act 1990

are known as fixed term or Mortgage Style (“MS”) loans, and were taken out under the

provisions of the Regulations made under the Education (Student Loans) Act 1990, which can

be found at the following internet link:

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/title/education%20student%20loans%20regulations?page=5

(please refer to the Regulations, including amending Regulations, made between 1994 and

1998)

All MS loan borrowers entered into Consumer Credit Agreements (“CCAs”), containing the

terms and conditions of their loans. I have attached copies of the CCAs below, one for MS

loans taken out between 1995 and 1997, and the other for MS loans taken out in or after 1998.

The provisions relating to passing information regarding MS loans to credit reference agencies

are contained in specific clauses of the CCAs, which all borrowers have read and signed.

The specific clause in the pre 1998 CCA that allows information regarding the loan to be passed

to credit reference agencies is clause 16, whereby any information relating to the agreement

can be disclosed to another party where this is deemed appropriate.

The specific clause in the post 1998 CCA that allows information regarding the loan to be

passed to credit reference agencies is clause 12 (b), where the borrower has broken the

Agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...