Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi all, I purchased a car in January from Big Motoring World Leeds. At the time of sale I was shown a tab on the salespersons computer marked 'service history' and I was able to take comfort knowing that the car had been serviced on 3 occasions as the date, mileage and company was there on screen. Being a 3 and a bit year old car that, in my mind, constituted full service history 🤷‍♂️ Anyway, collected the car a week later. Once home I settled down to through the book pack etc. Opened the service history booklet and it was completely blank. In addition there were no invoices detailing that any services had been done. I duly contacted BMW and asked them to supply me with proof of service history. They responded saying that on their 'vehicle documentation checklist' I had ticked and then signed to the fact that I had seen the service history and that I was happy with it. I dug out this checklist and what it actually states is 'seen service history online' which I had in the showroom. BMW seem to think that this satisfies their responsibility in providing service history. The reality is that I don't have any proof that the vehicle has ever been serviced! For my own peace of mind I ended up paying for a service that satisfied the manufacturers maintenance schedule to the tune of £330. I even complained to the finance company that the vehicle contravenes the Sale of Goods act 2015 as l, in effect, ot is not as described. Amazingly they weren't interested and instead I just got an email stating that it's not illegal to sell a vehicle without service history and that servicing costs were part and parcel of vehicle ownership. I've since complained to the ombudsman and am awaiting to see if they can help. I have no issue with the car but the treatment and customer service has been the worst I've ever experienced. I don't really know what to do next as I really do feel aggrieved that I've had to pay to service a car that should have already been serviced. Can anyone point me in the right direction please? 🙏
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Hi again all, below is another email they sent me, I just don't want to get in trouble or things to get worse with this crowd but I am taking your advice here. Anyway advice would be appreciated.   I am contacting you again after having tried to contact you both by email on 03/04/2024 and 10/04/2024, and by telephone on 10/04/2024 and 17/04/2024 to discuss the matter in relation to the regularization of the SOLIDWORKS case against xxx our company.   This is an urgent legal matter. Please contact me at your earliest convenience - +44 2921 920 296.    If we do not recieve a response before 24/04/2024, we will assume that you are not willing to settle this dispute amicably. The case will then be referred back to our client with whom, ultimately, the final decision lies on the enforcement of their intellectual property rights.    Yours sincerel y, Rhys
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Eurido again.... Can I claim for time wasted?


axil23
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3424 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wow. What a bunch of bullies these guys are.

 

 

I have just gone through the various threads and have a similar story with Erudio student loans.

 

 

I have supplied them everything under the sun to request a deferment and they keep on rejecting it.

 

 

My income is only 15k a year but the guy on the phone was saying that since your bank statements show an higher income

we will take that as meaning its over the allowance!

 

 

My response was that I am self employed so someone pays me for a job out which I make only 5-10%.

No we don't agree.

Send us your Tax return which I have and they want the form from HMRC which I don't get for another 2 months!

 

Supplied them my tax return documents which show my income - Not accepted

Supplied them my Tax return from my accountant - Not accepted

Supplied them my bank statements - Not Accepted

 

I have wasted a good 3-4 hrs on the phone with them and what a bunch of idiots they are.

 

I have read the threads and will fight them. What should I do next?

 

Also I want to be able to claim expenses them for the time wasted. Any suggestions?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watchdog had good feature on this a few weeks back.

 

As for expenses for wasted time, very unlikely, you can claim costs in a court setting and it would be feasibale to claim damages from them for time spent but would be very hard to prove and win.

 

Even then you could only realistically claim 3-4 hours of what your time is worth, this would unlikely to be much. perhaps minumum wage x 3 or the litigant in person rate of £18 x 3.

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell us about your loan

 

 

you REALLY need to stay off the phone to these people

 

 

you'll have no papertrail and they'll screw you over.

 

 

seems like they've got you jumping through every form/paperwork request they can.

 

 

they have NO ENTITLEMENT WHATSOEVER

to see 90% of those documents you have mentioned already.

 

 

quite honestly until we get more info on your loans

I'd simply find the ORIGINAL SLC deferment form

its on here somewhere

 

 

copy it and fill it in

 

 

sign it

 

 

and end it back.

 

 

sadly I suspect you've already filled in and sent their expanded form

which is how they fleeced all the other stuff out of you.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell us about your loan

 

you REALLY need to stay off the phone to these people

 

you'll have no papertrail and they'll screw you over.

 

seems like they've got you jumping through every form/paperwork request they can.

 

they have NO ENTITLEMENT WHATSOEVER

to see 90% of those documents you have mentioned already.

 

quite honestly until we get more info on your loans

I'd simply find the ORIGINAL SLC deferment form

its on here somewhere

 

copy it and fill it in

 

sign it

 

and end it back.

 

sadly I suspect you've already filled in and sent their expanded form

which is how they fleeced all the other stuff out of you.

 

dx

 

 

Taken out in 1996-1998.

 

 

My annual income is 16k right now and

 

 

I wanted to defer it for another year

 

 

they are saying that since the income for my self employement is 36k they will go with that figure.

 

 

Thats just silly if I get 36k in but spend 20k back on expenses on the business like buying goods

 

 

then my net income is only 16k which is what the HMRC taxes me on. Are they correct?

 

Yeah I thought they were a legit organisation and have a perfect credit history.

 

 

So to avoid any damage to it which they said that they would do with their various pressure tactics

I have given them what ever they have asked for.

 

 

Luckily everything has been done over email and only 2-3 phone calls. But all documents have been submitted over email.

 

Also since this has been going on since June to to their incompetence.

 

 

They are now claiming that they will only back date 3 months and

I will have to pay the rest once they finally agree to defer it.

 

 

Is that correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You go by the old SLC rules end off

no matter what these fleecers say.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You go by the old SLC rules end off

no matter what these fleecers say.

 

 

dx

 

Can they put any sort of negative remarks on my credit history? Or charge me late payments fees? I have complied with the original request and sent my deferment form off within a week but it hasn't been deferred due to their new requirements.

Link to post
Share on other sites

no-one can charge PENALTY fees

they are unlawful and reclaimable.

 

 

lowells claim they can trash your file

as your loans are old style

I don't think we have ever actually seen them do it

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just went through some mail that I got yesterday and the letter from HMRC is here that they want. Shall I email it off to them and be done with it? I really don't want to as they have really troubled me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you've done the rest

 

 

might shut them up?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

anyone chasing money etc etc

MUST hold a copy of the SIGNED loan Agreement.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Submitted the form that they asked for and got a call back from one their team leaders who questioned me on my income and bank statements. I advised him that I owned 3 properties through loans and he says that they will go off my income before expenses since I was a Landlord. As a LL I have various expenses which account for more then 50% of the income. If the HMRC calculates my taxes on my take home pay of 16k can these guys insist on me paying back my SL since my income before expenses is 36k.

 

He was saying that if someone gets 36k a year they can't then say they pay 1k for dinners, 4k for clothes, 3k for Petrol. My answer to that was that my expenditure does not include anything that is personal.

Link to post
Share on other sites

or tell them when they ring IN WRITING ONLY and hang up

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:headbang:

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:headbang:

 

dx

 

I know... I just wanted it dealt with and had the document that they needed so spoke with them.

 

Can anyone advise if legally they are right in their claim that they go of my income before any expenses?

Link to post
Share on other sites

in all these cases you need to refer to the ORIGINAL SLC T&C's

 

if the SLC calculated things one way

and arrows are doing in another

unless you sign a NEW AGREEMENT with arrows

 

they CANNOT change the deferment rules.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't have these.

 

 

Is this when a CCA comes in?

 

 

yes we have blank deferment forms but I don't think the full T&C's

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

whatever they are saying pers id ignore it.

I bet they've not put that in writing have they?

 

 

you need to refer to the original SLC T&C's.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought they could only assess on your nett profit, which in your case id £16K, no matter what carp they spout

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will ask them to put it in writing and update "if" they do.

 

They can be quick when they want to be.

 

 

someone called me last week about my earning being counted as gross before expenses.

 

 

I asked them to put it in writing and

 

 

they sent me a letter today to say that since my gross earning is over £2,000 odd a month I am liable to pay it back.

 

Thats just silly..... So say you own a sandwich shop and your turnover is 50k but you only make 10k after expenses they can't say that your income is 50k.

 

Any suggestions who I can speak to about this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to refer to the original SLC T&C's.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to refer to the original SLC T&C's.

 

See the original says that I need to be under the threshold

but it doesn't state anything about what qualifies as a income.

 

 

Interesting article http://www.theguardian.com/money/2014/may/20/student-loan-erudio-under-fire

 

It seems that they are advising credit agencies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...