Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DWP overpayment fishing exercise re mother’s estate


DavidRichmond
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3438 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After obtaining probate to deal with my late mother’s estate

 

 

I was contacted by the DWP in one of their standard fishing exercises re: benefit overpayments.

 

 

This initial letter included the line “We will let you know whether or not we need to make further enquiries within 20 working days”.

If only.

 

Despite returning the form the next day I was chased for a response a month later.

2 days after that they confirmed receipt of my original response!

 

 

Based on this my expectations of response time from DWP are poor.

That was 2 months ago and I have heard nothing further.

 

 

I have no desire to wake these sleeping dogs but as executor I would like to finalise and distribute the estate

and would like to know if there is any legal limit to how long I can be forced to wait.

 

I know that a Trustee Act notice in the London Gazette provides a time limit for creditors to come forward

but in this case a letter notifying a potential debt has already been received prior to publication of a Notice.

 

 

If this case got lost in the cracks would I be expected to hold the funds permanently in limbo awaiting a response or is there a limit?

 

 

I haven’t been able to Google an answer so I thought I’d ask the experts!

 

DR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to the site despite the difficult circumstances that brings you to it and sincere condolences on your late sad loss.

An acquaintance of mine recently had a similar predicament while acting as executor for one of his relatives.

He said that he had legal advice to the effect that it was for him as executor to settle all debts accruing to the estate of the deceased before the remainder could be disbursed.

This involved him in taking steps to speed up any requests for settlement by creditors.

No mention was made of a time limit but had he not taken steps to speed things up it would surely have taken longer, which could have resulted in other complications and possible expense.

Perhaps you could inform DWP that they will be held liable for any expenses accruing as a result of their delay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

May I ask how long ago the overpayment occurred, how much it is & the reason for it?

 

I have no idea what benefits my mother may have received or how much,

 

 

my guess about "when" is that it would be between June 2009 and August 2013,

the latter being the time of her death and

the former a time when I know her savings had been small.

 

 

During that period I believe she spent very little of the benefits she received

so her “savings” would have grown but without amounts & dates from bank statements

I’ve no idea when she would have ceased qualifying for some of those benefits

& what the extent of any overpayments might be.

 

 

I don’t want to fork out an arm & a leg for 4 years’ worth of statements until I know how far back the DWP thinks the overpayments go.

 

I’d like to bring my duties as executor to a close and the usual Notice in the Gazette won’t achieve that

because I’ve already been advised of the DWP’s “potential claim”.

 

 

I'm hoping there's a legal time limit to how long they can expect everything to remain frozen awaiting their decision.

 

 

(Or, failing that, the matter slips through the cracks for six years so it becomes unenforceable.

Only joking on that one

- I know it doesn't apply to debts to the Crown.

Unless this would just be considered a debt to a local authority, in which case I'm not joking.)

 

DR

Link to post
Share on other sites

[...] between June 2009 and August 2013, [...] I don’t want to fork out an arm & a leg for 4 years’ worth of statements

 

Tip: Send a SAR to the bank concerned enclosing the usual £10 fee they normally charge - As the executor of the estate, I believe they are obliged to respond to the request even although the account(s) is not in your name.

 

Having said that, it would be worth contacting the Bereavement Centre of the bank concerned and asking for their assistance in providing copies of the statements - Came across a post on another site where (it is claimed that) Barclays BC provided all the information free of charge.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes sar to the bank concerned

 

 

as an exec you are legally entitled to do so

 

 

wont hurt either as likewise

you are entitled to reclaim any PPI too etc etc

 

 

and not only on the accounts with that group.

 

 

when my mum died I got over £7k out of barclaycard

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If she was claiming pension credit they will take a very long time indeed.

Have they indicated that there is a definite overpayment?

 

.“...may have been paid too much income related benefit” was their phrase. Care to put a figure on “very long time” and any clue if there’s a limit to how long they’re allowed to take?

It was interesting to note from today’s news that the various celebrities whose tax avoidance methods HMRC took a dim view of will not be subject to penalties because investigations took too long. It would be nice if there were a simple table showing the time limits applicable to different kinds of investigation to save questions similar to mine (but, as far as I could find, not the same) popping up repeatedly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

pension credit decisions can take months. It may be that your Mother was in an assessed income period & that there isn't an overpayment.

 

Write to them setting out what you have said above. Give them 28 days to respond then if they don't, involve your MP.

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...