Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 4.3(4) The court serves the claim on the defendant by sending a paper version of the completed online claim form to the defendant at the postal address given for the defendant. https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/practice-direction-51r-online-court-pilot Practice Direction 6A, paragraph 4.1 says: “[w]here a document is to be served by fax or other electronic means the party who is to be served or the solicitor acting for that party must previously have indicated in writing to the party serving – “that the party to be served or the solicitor is willing to accept service by fax or other electronic means; and “the fax number, e-mail address or other electronic identification to which it must be sent.” This means that delivery or sending court documents by email is not service, unless the other party expressly consents to it.
    • This should be a matter for the School Head to deal with, have you been to see them?
    • Just a very interesting point for the witness statement when needed, is that all the missives they've sent are demanding £160. The claim, again issued by their "expert" solicitors, is trying to extort £170. Naughty!
    • Fraudsters copy the details of firms we authorise to try and convince people that their firm is genuine. Find out why you shouldn’t deal with this clone firm.View the full article
    • Please have a look at the letter below. I made a couple of further refinements. We will try to finish it for tomorrow so that you can get enough tomorrow evening.   Also, I did ask you whether the same toilet which you installed was used to the new installation – you haven't answered this. Any reason for that? I also asked you about obtaining a statement from your electrician and you didn't respond to that either. Any reason for that? Also, I can't remember if I did ask you – had you already made a snagging this? I think I did ask you to give us a list of the snags but I don't think you respond to that either. It will be very helpful if you did address questions that we put otherwise the whole thing takes much longer much more than is necessary. In the end we will need information from you. You will have to provide it
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Defaults and getting a better understanding ?


periwinkles
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3509 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am new here but been reading a lot of helpful info and thought id post my own question for clarification.

 

I have a default on my account ... (as is the way when you are young and stupid ) anyway it is about to close and drop off my file this month and next.

 

I read here that accounts drop off after the last listed default.

 

 

There is one account i have default registered 2008

- first one but there is a debt collectors agency registering a default somehow

... last year

... i am viewing this via a credit report that gives the monthly status of the account and goes back a number of years.

 

 

I have not tampered with this account i have not given reason for them to move things or the clock to start ticking again ..

 

My question is .

. that default they registered last year ..

. does it start the clock again on it or does it go off the original ..

 

thanks in advance for reading my blurb and apologies if this isn't in the right forum .

 

 

.. kinda lost on navigation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi and welcome to CAG

 

The important date is the original default date which was in 2008. Once a debt is sold, the new owner replaces the original creditor with their own name however, the original default date must stay the same. They are allowed to update you file on a monthly basis and place the date of that update but nothing more.

 

If they have changed the original date to a more recent one then that is grounds for complaint.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the Reply! :-D

 

Well, The drop off date is next month .

.. it actually states this on the credit report.

 

 

But on the side panel - i use check my file.

 

 

There is the monthly update of the account that that agency holds for you and

 

 

i noticed that they listed it as Default this time Last year.

 

 

I will wait till the end of the year and if it hasn't dropped off, then yes you are right i will file a complaint.

 

Cheers on the input, much appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years

has passed from date of default, whether paid off or not.

.

the WHOLE ACCOUNT WILL VANISH, never to return.

.

however, this does not mean the debt itself is not still owed

consider a CCA request.

.

This is so that someone who continues paying something

- even after 6 years from default

- should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default

and ends up with a clean file after 6 years.

 

 

..............

 

 

ignore the monthly 'markers' they are not important.

 

 

its the defaulted date in the debt summary line that triggers the above.

 

 

NOTHING or no-one can change that date.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats very good news!

 

I will request a CCA i think,

 

 

since this debt was back from when i was 18 and a student

even the most organised people don't keep quite so many details that far back ...

 

 

maybe i should have but i wouldn't know where to start now.

 

 

The CCA agreement will then state what .

 

 

. how long they may challenge me for the debt .

 

 

. does this count even though its been sold on ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

to enforce a debt

whomever 'owns' the debt now

MUST hold an enforceable signed agreement.

 

 

esp if the credit was taken out prior to Apr 2007

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they must have it to do anything

 

 

CCA them.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...