Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • OP stated they had been arrested, but not charged (let alone convicted). They DON'T have a criminal record, but do have an entry on the PNC. That information stays on the PNC (Police National Computer) for life, but doesn't get released in a standard DBS. It only MIGHT get released for an Enhanced DBS (eDBS) check  ... but it would be incredibly unlikely. (The rational behind this is that eDBS's allow for 'information at Chief Officer of Police's discretion' ..... this covers the 2 'barring lists' and is also intended for the scenario where someone has multiple arrests or investigations, where safeguarding is a concern .... it was brought in after the Soham murders / Ian Huntley case, where the information known about the now-convicted child murderer may have prevented his employment in a school, had it been made available). So, for the sake of accuracy and completeness, arrests stay on the PNC for life, wont appear in a standard DBS, MIGHT appear in an eDBS, but in reality, would be the exception rather than the norm, and I can't see them being released  to a defense barrister. What then if the defence found out a different way, and brought it up in court?. Again, unlikely, but the important feature is that the judge would make sure they trod very carefully!. They MIGHT consider using it if there were other factors that allowed them to try to cast doubts as to the truthfulness of your evidence, but on its own : No way. Anyone MIGHT be arrested (if a seemingly plausible complaint been made against them)! The approach to take if it did come up is to be truthful. "Yes, I was arrested. It arose from a vexatious complaint. I wasn't charged, let alone convicted. That could happen to any one of us, if a vexatious complaint gets made" Far better that than lying, saying you'd never been arrested, and getting caught in a lie : that would ruin your credibility. I'm incredibly doubtful it will even come up, though.
    • we dont get N157 because its new OCMC but no court dont have evidence either.   Just seems a bit of a pointless wait but oh well
    • Post #9 suggested some options to avoid or put off having a smart meter. Post #12 a simple solution to your complaint about the ay they handle fixed monthly DD. It's not really clear why you posted if you're going get irate when members "jump in" with suggestions. You can see what I'm referring to on "gasracker.uk" to allay your suspicion that I was lying in Post #16 which was made to correct ther misinformation shown in your Post #15
    • Back to octopus from the smart meter/tariff salesperson. Octopus have now said just ignore the letter - I dont have to have one despite there letter implying (at least) it was required, but that i will HAVE to have a smart meter if current meters stop working as 'their suppliers dont supply non smart meters any more'. They also say they do not/will not disable any smart functionality when they fit a smart meter I am of course going to challenge that. Thats their choice of meter fitter/supplier problem not mine
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Why does nothing ever get done? (Benefit Fraud)


hudsonhicks
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3450 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I know a woman that has been fraudulently claiming tax credits using her mothers house for 3 years now. I have reported her about 10 different occasions during these past years as has another friend of mine..

 

Absolutely NOTHING gets done.

 

She lives 200 miles south in a cottage with her working boyfriend and three children. With the Tax Credits and the Child benefit money She's pulling in close to £900 a month.

 

Before the predictable "you're mistaken" replies come in i'd just like to emphasize the fact that i KNOW without a shadow of a doubt. I have a mutual friend who has also reported her, and she's also tried to get her to help her with more benefit fraud - Asked to falsely "rent" her house and split the housing benefit money.

 

I can only imagine how many other people out there are doing this and getting away with it. Apparently they only investigate 5% of fraud reports - I can believe it!!

If the DWP/HMRC employed more people to combat this, i'm certain they'd make massive savings from lost money and fines etc..

 

Anything else i can do? Write to MP maybe? I'm so annoyed seeing her holiday pictures from Jamaica on facebook

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know a woman that has been fraudulently claiming tax credits using her mothers house for 3 years now. I have reported her about 10 different occasions during these past years as has another friend of mine..

 

Absolutely NOTHING gets done.

 

Nothing that your aware of. You will not be privvy to anythign happenign behind the scenes.

 

She lives 200 miles south in a cottage with her working boyfriend and three children. With the Tax Credits and the Child benefit money She's pulling in close to £900 a month.

 

How do you know what shes pulling in?

 

Before the predictable "you're mistaken" replies come in i'd just like to emphasize the fact that i KNOW without a shadow of a doubt. I have a mutual friend who has also reported her, and she's also tried to get her to help her with more benefit fraud - Asked to falsely "rent" her house and split the housing benefit money.

 

I guess we have only your word to go on here. Even from your point of view this is Hearsay and not evidence.

 

I can only imagine how many other people out there are doing this and getting away with it. Apparently they only investigate 5% of fraud reports - I can believe it!!

If the DWP/HMRC employed more people to combat this, i'm certain they'd make massive savings from lost money and fines etc..

 

How much money do you think is actually lost through benefit fraud?

 

HOW do you know they only investigate 5%

 

Anything else i can do? Write to MP maybe? I'm so annoyed seeing her holiday pictures from Jamaica on facebook

 

 

Im sorry this sounds like a rant trying to stir up hatred against benefit claiments. There is nothing factual presented here, just a daily mail steriotype of a case.

 

IF this is genuine then sure write to your mp.

 

IF this person is really claiming benefit fraud then I hope the authorities catch up with them.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im sorry this sounds like a rant trying to stir up hatred against benefit claiments. There is nothing factual presented here, just a daily mail steriotype of a case.

 

IF this is genuine then sure write to your mp.

 

IF this person is really claiming benefit fraud then I hope the authorities catch up with them.

 

How do i know?

 

She's told me last year.

 

She's told my friend.

 

She's logged into her online banking on my friends phone and he's seen the £165 tax credits weekly payment.

 

My friend (reluctantly) picks up her benefit mail from her mums house as she lives 200 miles away

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perhaps the claim is correct based on her relationship and income and she is winding you up.

 

Does your "friend" open the alleged benefit mail in order to confirm the facts as you see them?

 

If the claim is correct perhaps thats why nothing is done by the HMRC.

 

DWP don't adminster tax credits or child benefit, but this is why the Single Fraud Investigation Service is currently going live.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This could be another example of the DWP’s ieptitude. You ask what else you can do. Perhaps you could use the DWP’s own grievance procedures, citing their Code of Practice and pointing out your attempts at reversing the consequences of their maladministration.

It may also be advisable to warn your friend who might, if what you say is true,be complicit in facilitating this fraud, if such it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

DWP do not administer tax credits or child benefit.

 

HMRC administer both so it's them the complaint needs raising with. As far as I know HMRC haven't transferred to SFIS yet and as such would still investigate tax credit/child benefit only fraud.

 

If the person claiming tax credits and child benefit are also in receipt of a passported benefit then the DWP would investigate on HMRC's behalf.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It could be that they are entitled to £165 a week in tax credits - and that's why no action has been taken. It may be that there is a current investigation.

 

I don't know what percentage of reports HMRC investigate, but I know that DWP Investigate much much more than 5%. Where did you get the figure from?

Please do not ask me for advice via PM as I will not reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can people not just accept what i said at face value. I don't want to go into more details to "prove" it to you guys because i dont need to

 

I wouldn't even bother reporting unless i was 100%

 

I suspect the government doesn't really give a toss except to make a few token convictions that make the local newspaper.

 

 

I'll phone the HMRC tax credit line tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can people not just accept what i said at face value. I don't want to go into more details to "prove" it to you guys because i dont need to

 

I wouldn't even bother reporting unless i was 100%

 

I suspect the government doesn't really give a toss except to make a few token convictions that make the local newspaper.

 

 

I'll phone the HMRC tax credit line tomorrow.

 

Yes we can take it at face value.

 

However from a fraud investigators view point we get allegations like this all the time and when we look at the claim it's correct. We even have people ring back with further information or to report them again a few months later.

 

We cannot tell the person that the claim is correct, that we have investigated or if the person being reported is even claiming benefits, so it often looks like nothing is done.

 

So to flip it on it's head, maybe take it a face value that what she has told you is pure lies to annoy you.

 

If it is true keep ringing HMRC and reporting it, sooner or later they may action it, although they do not have many criminal investigators and mainly go down a compliance route. If you feel they aren't listening or taking action make a formal complaint to them or get your MP involved.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I am, which is why sometimes my posts can be slightly harsh. However i try to help were I can.

 

We get this type complaint all the time, however out of say 10 allegations that are made only between 5 -6 are worth looking at owing to incorrectness and some are just plain malicious. Various agencies also receive 100's of reports of suspected fraud weekly per region and not all can be looked at. They will get risk scored based on information obtained within the reports and those with the best evidence i.e. partner name, employer name etc will get looked over the reports that just Z is working.

 

Tax credits is our biggest bug bear though, as we can't even get HMRC to do anything when we refer cases to them that are on a plate or offer to take the offences for them. This is covered under SFIS though so the issue will slowly be resolved.

 

So I do feel for the OP, but I also see it from the claimants view were sometimes the allegations is just purely malicious. I had a case that would get reported every few months, the claim was correct, however the same person constantly kept ringing stating nothing had been done and they were still on benefits etc. I wanted to say that it had been looked at and all was ok, but from a DPA view point we can't so just have to say that it would be logged again on the system and looked at if required.

 

Maybe she is on the fiddle and maybe the evidence doesn't prove she is and that is why nothing has been done. Remember investigators have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt for a criminal case and probability for a compliance case. Without sufficient evidence you can't get either decision.

 

I am by no way sticking up for them, but there are a lot of hoops to jump through in order to resovle a case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...