Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. And, I also continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Challenging personal injury claim for exploding mobile phone charger


only1carra
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3449 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Last year I sold a mobile phone on ebay which was imported from China, I sell these as part of my business. The charger of the phone however is a ce approved charger purchased in the UK

The buyer claims the charger exploded causing personal injury.

They have instructed a solicitor who are currently in the process of gathering evidence and are going to proceed with a county court claim.

I am surprised by this allegation because I have supplied a safety approved item and the fact also remains the charger used could be any charger.

I have not yet instructed a solicitor, any advice would be welcome

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correction, this was sold on amazon. Amazon refunded the buyer with no money deducted from myself and the buyer accepted and kept the item.

I did receive a visit from trading standards who I advised the charger was genuine, not an importa, and not counterfeit as claimed. Trading standards currently have the charger.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will try and find someone who can advise.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi only

 

I take it that you have receipts / invoices relating the purchase of the charger in the UK.

 

You need to 'nail down' the charger purchased and sold. If it's been swapped would you be able to tell?, i.e. serial number etc.

 

Also, your supplier has responsibility here, if it's the one supplied to you, that you sold.

 

The legal guys will be along soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I do not have recipiepts for.the charger. The phones I sell usually come with eu chargers but I came accross a large quantity of blackberry chargers with a job lot purchased at a police auction.

This stock comes from high street retailers and both the packaging and product gave no reason for me to believe they were not legitimate and safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Surely, if they weren't safe the police should not have auctioned them off, but destroyed them.

 

One of Trading Standards remits is to advise local businesses. You could contact your local Trading Standards for advise.

 

You can prove that you bought them from a Police Auction?

 

Unfortunately I do not have recipiepts for.the charger. The phones I sell usually come with eu chargers but I came accross a large quantity of blackberry chargers with a job lot purchased at a police auction.

This stock comes from high street retailers and both the packaging and product gave no reason for me to believe they were not legitimate and safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know. They were part of a job lot of many other items. My main concern is how I go about defending this claim and where I stand rather than questioning the responsibility of the sellers of the chargers.

As we all know a charger can explode whether it is genuine or not.My concern is am I liable here and can it be proven in a court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The legal guys will be along soon.

 

I don't know. They were part of a job lot of many other items. My main concern is how I go about defending this claim and where I stand rather than questioning the responsibility of the sellers of the chargers.

As we all know a charger can explode whether it is genuine or not.My concern is am I liable here and can it be proven in a court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

For now I would just write back stating that liability is denied, that the charger sold was an approved charger with no known defect and that you require proof as to the cause and extent of the injuries.

 

 

As a business you are covered by the Sale of Goods Act and liable if the charger was not 'satisfactory quality', i.e. defective. Even so I think it would be difficult for them to prove that the injuries were caused by the charger. I think they would also have to prove that the charger was faulty in some way - I am no expert but presumably these things don't just randomly explode for no reason.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Untill they have an enginieers report stating the cause of the fault then there is not a lot to do other that to deny liability. A couple of points though:

 

You purchased the chargers from an auction, so they are of unknown parenthood; did you get any of them tested?

 

The police nor any auction house as far as i am aware will perform tests to check that products are safe, otherwise car auctions would have gone to the wall years ago.

 

My guess will be that if they get a report on the charger it will come back that its a fake, CE stickers and the such are easy enough to get applied in factories in China and mean nothing, if this does happen you will be glad to have buisness insurance (I do hope that you do)

It is easier to enter a rich man than for a camel to pass a needle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Untill they have an enginieers report stating the cause of the fault then there is not a lot to do other that to deny liability. A couple of points though:

 

You purchased the chargers from an auction, so they are of unknown parenthood; did you get any of them tested?

 

The police nor any auction house as far as i am aware will perform tests to check that products are safe, otherwise car auctions would have gone to the wall years ago.

 

My guess will be that if they get a report on the charger it will come back that its a fake, CE stickers and the such are easy enough to get applied in factories in China and mean nothing, if this does happen you will be glad to have buisness insurance (I do hope that you do)

 

Unfortunately I do not have business insurance and neither were any tests taken out on the chargers other than checking each one worked.

I also sell a number of used items online, does this also mean that for every electrical item that fails the seller is liable?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any liability insurance to cover you? If so pass this to them immediately.

 

I imagine the Claimant's claim will be brought under sections 2 and 3 of the Consumer Protection Act 1987. Might be worth a read...

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1987/43/contents

 

No i have no liability insurance. I was only operating as a small sideline working from home but in hindsight I know now it still would have been worthwhiLe!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, yes you will be liable. If you had a supplier then you would then counterclaim onto them but in your situation the buck will stop with you, for this and any future claim.

 

Are you trading as a limited company?

It is easier to enter a rich man than for a camel to pass a needle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically, yes you will be liable. If you had a supplier then you would then counterclaim onto them but in your situation the buck will stop with you, for this and any future claim.

 

Are you trading as a limited company?

 

I am a VAT registered sole trader

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am a VAT registered sole trader

 

Not the answer that i was hoping for, as s sole trader you personally have unlimited liability,

 

If you have any of these chargers left hold on to them and do not sell anymore untill you see how this is gonig to pan out, also I suggest you consider the origions of the rest of your stock; anything else that could be dodgy? and don't just rely on the sticker.

 

On the CE issue there are two CE's floating around, one defines that is conforms to the european standard and the other means its China Export, they look quite alike but sadly dont mean the same.

It is easier to enter a rich man than for a camel to pass a needle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not the answer that i was hoping for, as s sole trader you personally have unlimited liability,

 

If you have any of these chargers left hold on to them and do not sell anymore untill you see how this is gonig to pan out, also I suggest you consider the origions of the rest of your stock; anything else that could be dodgy? and don't just rely on the sticker.

 

On the CE issue there are two CE's floating around, one defines that is conforms to the european standard and the other means its China Export, they look quite alike but sadly dont mean the same.

 

Thank you and everybody else for the useful information.

So what would be the likely outcome of a court case, ie payout or settlement. They claim they suffered dizziness from the shock, had to call an ambulance and had to

Stay off work 3 weeks. Although there is no actual physical injury.

The firm representing say they will seek to recover costs for medical tests and testing of the charger. What sort of figures are we looking at and would it be wise to settle before going to court? Is there any defence I could have in this case?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 weeks off work; that must have been one hell of a shock.

 

Personally i would wait to see how this unfolds, at the moment we do not even know that it was your charger that was at fault rather than just the weak point in the chain. Once you see some movement from either trading standards or the clients solictors then it may be time to meet with a lawyer.

 

If they go for a personal injury claim that will initially try to claim for everything including mental distress to the cat and loss of their paper round; this is where a lawyer will be able to advise you better.

 

Defense it limited because in all fairness you have failed to act in a "reasonable" manner i.e selling un-tested product, not knowing its heritige etc. In the long term there is no such thing as a fast buck.

It is easier to enter a rich man than for a camel to pass a needle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they have already mentioned mental distress. They have sent pics of the exploded charger and trading standards have ended their investigation.

Trading standards only got involved to give guidelines on the safety requirements and gave me some good advice.

It is almost a year now since the incident and after writing to me a few times the solicitors say they are now about to file a case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you and everybody else for the useful information.

So what would be the likely outcome of a court case, ie payout or settlement. They claim they suffered dizziness from the shock, had to call an ambulance and had to

Stay off work 3 weeks. Although there is no actual physical injury.

The firm representing say they will seek to recover costs for medical tests and testing of the charger. What sort of figures are we looking at and would it be wise to settle before going to court? Is there any defence I could have in this case?

They haven't proved anything yet! The 3 weeks does sound excessive and should be backed up by proper evidence.

 

If they can back up what they are saying then it is always worth considering a settlement. Might be worth getting a solicitor on board if a claim is filed.

 

In the meantime you need to do your own research on how/why chargers might explode. I'm no charger expert but I am a bit sceptical about the suggestion that this happens all the time. We are only speculating that the charger might have been a fake so it is worth getting other stock tested. If the charger turns out to be genuine perhaps you could point to some sort of contributory negligence if this person did something silly? I think this would need an independent expert to help the court unravel so you might want to think about trying to find an appropriate expert.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...