Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello Caggers,   I've been trying for years to get an old EE account wiped off my credit file. It was opened in 2013 and almost immediately defaulted but was shown as "Payment Arrangement" ever since. I contacted EE by telephone in 2022 and was advised it had not been wiped because therte was still £69 owing, so I paid it and thought it would correct once the CRA's updated their reporting cycle.   However, it has still not been removed. I made a formal complaint on 27/03/2024 and have had contact with the executive team who advised that  "EE account 106985089 has now been deleted from the Credit File as it failed to close as it was reporting the payment arrangement set up despite, as advised this failing which should have resulted in a further default showing.  Please be advised the deletions we have completed take 24 hours to update if a paid service is used to view the Credit File. If the customer uses one of the free services to view the Credit File, the recordings update in 24 hours but the changes can take up to 30 days to be visible on a new copy of the Credit File. I have requested compensation and been advised by EE that another team are looking into this. That was almost 2 weeks ago and there has been no contact since, despite me chasing it. I do not want to go to court and would rather settle this amicably. However,I have been advised that I might have a claim for aggravated damages due to the length of time the incorrect reporting has been on my file and the fact that I told EE about this issue and paid the demanded outstanding amount of £69 almost 18 months ago. Should I just wait for EE to reply or should I start building my case against them? Is their statement admissible as evidence of their blame or do I need to dig a bit more? I made a DSAR which was initially rejected as having no data found yet. I trawled my e-mails from 2013 and found the account number and mobile number, so I'm now awaiting the result of my 2nd attempt at DSAR. I have very little in the way of proof of actual loss except a mortgage refusal e-mail from HBOS in 2015. I have also had high interest loans and credit over the last 10 years but again cannot directly attribute this to this one specific error. There were other items on my credit file that could also have contributed to a low credit score too and I'm not out to cash in on anything. I want to make sure I don't end up shooting myself in the foot for any obvious reason and would appreciate any help from anyone who has had similar experience with breaches of DPA.
    • Noted. Keep an eye on the other threads here including the update a few hours back by Rob Carr.
    • dont need statements. nor std info sheets. EVERTHING else  dx
    • they have 6mts else it dies. ................. BUT yet again today you've posted on someone else's thread posts now moved here. please keep to your OWN THREAD!! now to date you've not bothered to reply to our questions so we CAN help you.    
    • Update: tfl is taking me to court I'm trying to get an ooc claim from them but they have not been replying to my emails. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Chasing Cap 1 for PPI compensation


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3142 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We have been chasing Capital One since March 2012 trying to get PPI money back but to date no success.

 

Because of my ill health and poor postal service in my area,

even the FOS has decided not to help us mad2.gif

 

Everything was down to time limits and when I got ill, all timings got put aside.

 

Now, Neither Cap One or FOS want to help.

 

Cap One have been charging us PPI since 2002.

 

Has anyone got any good ideas or should I just forget the whole thing question.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes filrobbo,

 

 

the last letter we got was dated 16 March 2012.

 

 

The letter states " Following a complete investigation into your complaint we are confident that the policy was sold appropriately.

 

 

During your internet application you clearly indicated that you wanted to purchase the policy

and from the information you provided, you were eligible to do so".

 

 

It then goes on

 

 

As this is the case I will not be looking to refund any of the premiums or associated interest charged to your account".

 

 

It then tells us to contact the FOS within 6 months from the date of this letter.

 

 

Because of ill health I could not do anything until August 2013.

 

 

The FOS decided that we had no case and therefore they were closing the file.

 

 

I did call the FOS and ask if they would reconsider but to no avail.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you missed the 6mts FOS window from cap1's 'final response?'

 

 

I think cap1 just like EGG had a website that either didn't let you progress

or had the PPI box pre ticked

before it let you progress.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

only by looking at other cap1 claims here

 

 

the trouble is

for 2001 there was no-one to enforce the rules

so that prob what the FOS are going on about

or would

even if you were within 6mts of the Cap1 'final response' letter

 

 

you did get a letter from cap1 stating it was their final response?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Greetings dx,

 

 

yes I did get a final response in March 2012 from Cap 1,

 

 

because of ill health, I didn't get hold of the FOS until August 2013.

 

 

I realise that it was well over the 6 months

there was little I could do.

 

 

FOS made a half hearted attempt to do something

 

 

Cap 1 objected to FOS looking at our complaint.

 

 

This was because they (Cap1) said that the complaint was referred to the FOS too late.

 

 

FOS said that they could occasionally look into complaints made out of time

- but only if there are exceptional circumstances that caused the delay!

 

 

What more can I say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would expect ill health, if you can prove this

 

 

say by appointment , operations etc etc

that the FOS will help you

 

 

its not too great a hurdle to overcome.

 

 

the issue here is its from 2001.

 

 

it might be better to ring the FOS

and ask them the question...

 

 

if my claim were to be accepted, what real prospect is there of you actually helping me

as the policy was sold in 2001

which is well before your birth in 2005

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

My wife has been trying to get Capital One repay all the PPI that she is owed over the past 6+ years but they refuse :mad2:.

 

 

We have gone to the financial ombudsman who were as much use as a chocolate fireguard,

 

 

and we even went to somebody who said they could get the PPI refunded even though we had tried ourselves, but to no avail.

 

 

I am beginning to think that the only way to get this sorted is to go to court.

 

Has anyone got any ideas :?:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

I will move your thread to a PPI forum so people will be able to help you easier

 

This is an administrative action on my part, you do not need ot do anything.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

old and new threads merged.

 

 

have you got copies of all the statements and the online agreement

whereby they say she ticked the box?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I am beginning to think that the only way to get this sorted is to go to court.

 

 

I've a feeling that might be your only shot at it, what sort of amount of re-claim are you talking about.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...