Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Me and My Various Benefit Claims and issues


Jmulv
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2386 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Do be aware though, that if you sign off you won't be getting any National Insurance credits as your new job is below the Lower earnings limit of £111 pw. If you remain under the Lower Earnings Limit for several years this could impact negatively on your state pension entitlement.

Start every day off with a smile and get it over with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 695
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Go down to your LA office and ask for the forms required to claim HB/CTR - They will want proof of savings, stocks & shares, and wage slips. The last one will be difficult if you have only just started working, but you can still get the forms back to them and supply wage slips when you do get some.

 

If you do overtime, advise the council of this within a reasonable time (many councils will accept four weeks as "reasonable"). Again, they will want pay slips as evidence.

 

As far as the JCP/DWP is concerned, you just need to inform them that you are closing your claim for JSA for personal reasons - If they press the issue, you can either walk away or ask which regulation requires you to provide the information.... Best to inform them in writing, and then they can't ask the question.

 

If you are attached to the WP/CWP, you might get a phone call or two from the provider - You can use the opportunity to tell them where to go without fear of sanction.

 

So you have to do a reclaim of your HB? there isn't a form you can fill in to just switch over?

 

I did it when I signed off for 3 weeks just filled in a nil income form and my claim carried on as normal.

 

I mean nothing is changing i'm still earning just below JSA so I assume my HB entitlement won't change?

 

Do be aware though, that if you sign off you won't be getting any National Insurance credits as your new job is below the Lower earnings limit of £111 pw. If you remain under the Lower Earnings Limit for several years this could impact negatively on your state pension entitlement.

 

Didn't know that, what does that involve?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you have to do a reclaim of your HB? there isn't a form you can fill in to just switch over?

 

I did it when I signed off for 3 weeks just filled in a nil income form and my claim carried on as normal.

 

Pay a visit to your LA office - It may be as simple as declaring a change of circumstances. If it is, less paperwork for both you and the council.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So you have to do a reclaim of your HB? there isn't a form you can fill in to just switch over?

 

I did it when I signed off for 3 weeks just filled in a nil income form and my claim carried on as normal.

 

I mean nothing is changing i'm still earning just below JSA so I assume my HB entitlement won't change?

 

 

 

Didn't know that, what does that involve?

 

If you earn above £111 pw in the 2014/15 tax year then you'll get full NI credits, if you earn below you'll get no NI credits unless you sign on for NI credits only. The good thing about being a NI credits only signer is that the work programme is completely voluntary and as NI credits can't be sanctioned you're effectively untouchable.

Start every day off with a smile and get it over with.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn’t sure the best place to post this, follow-On from this thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?436212-Post-Work-Programme-Help&p=4644495#post4644495

 

Anyway so second PWPS meeting today and I went well prepared, thank goodness.

 

They still don’t have my Exit Report from the WP so quizzed the “Advisor” about that.

 

After that we were to be discussing my path and they steamed into the sales pitch for the MWA / Community Work Placement in an attempt to get me onboard. They must be briefed to get everyone on that path as it’s completely and very obviously wrong in my case. I explained that and was asked why.

 

This is why my preparation was useful because I produced a printout from the Universal Jobmatch Toolkit stating that I have all four of the requirements for the JCP Offer path.

 

  • recent, relevant work experience (paid, voluntary or a work placement) with which to populate their CV

 

  • demonstrated an ability to pro-actively seek employment

 

  • demonstrated work-related disciplines and behaviours

 

  • no significant challenges to overcome in securing employment

Looking unfussed, the Advisor put me on that path and made me an appointment. I now have to go into the Jobcentre daily to search 30mins before an appointment. It’s the lesser of two evils but still a pain when I can do this from home.

 

I asked about travel costs and apparently they are refunded at the end of a week after having used it, is this correct?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn’t sure the best place to post this, follow-On from this thread:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?436212-Post-Work-Programme-Help&p=4644495#post4644495

 

Anyway so second PWPS meeting today and I went well prepared, thank goodness.

 

They still don’t have my Exit Report from the WP so quizzed the “Advisor” about that.

 

After that we were to be discussing my path and they steamed into the sales pitch for the MWA / Community Work Placement in an attempt to get me onboard. They must be briefed to get everyone on that path as it’s completely and very obviously wrong in my case. I explained that and was asked why.

 

This is why my preparation was useful because I produced a printout from the Universal Jobmatch Toolkit stating that I have all four of the requirements for the JCP Offer path.

 

  • recent, relevant work experience (paid, voluntary or a work placement) with which to populate their CV

 

  • demonstrated an ability to pro-actively seek employment

 

  • demonstrated work-related disciplines and behaviours

 

  • no significant challenges to overcome in securing employment

Looking unfussed, the Advisor put me on that path and made me an appointment. I now have to go into the Jobcentre daily to search 30mins before an appointment. It’s the lesser of two evils but still a pain when I can do this from home.

 

I asked about travel costs and apparently they are refunded at the end of a week after having used it, is this correct?

Yes they will refund you your travel costs - so does that mean you have to visit the jobcentre every day now? It may have been better just going onto the mwa coz in a few months they will probably put you on it anyway

TJR JNR

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes they will refund you your travel costs - so does that mean you have to visit the jobcentre every day now? It may have been better just going onto the mwa coz in a few months they will probably put you on it anyway

 

Yeah MWA may be lesser of 2 evils,

 

I did it and it lasts for 4 weeks, annoying but that was the end of it for me for a while.... didn't help me with anything. In your case having to sign on every day could last longer than MWA.

 

However community work placement is a lot longer so try to avoid that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you earn above £111 pw in the 2014/15 tax year then you'll get full NI credits, if you earn below you'll get no NI credits unless you sign on for NI credits only. The good thing about being a NI credits only signer is that the work programme is completely voluntary and as NI credits can't be sanctioned you're effectively untouchable.

 

I'll have to look into this,

 

I've just signed off for now losing a little money per week because it feels so good to not have to go to the job centre, if I need to make up the shortfall I'll have to sign back on I guess whilst working part time but I assume I'll be subjected to the same idiocy as I was when I was unemployed. If they start with bollocks such as community work placement or any of that I'll be signing straight back off....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to finish off an IT qualification that I've been working towards for a few months so the CP would have prevented that. I can be done with it and I have work lined up once qualified so I'm keen to avoid the work placement. Signing every day isn't that much of a hardship in comparison and I can easily prove job applications etc.

 

I did say in a previous post it was MWA but in my case it would have been Community Work Placement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm trying to finish off an IT qualification that I've been working towards for a few months so the CP would have prevented that.

 

If you ever get told you will be placed on this CWP, insist that it is referred to a Decision Maker before the placement is made. Highlight the fact that you are currently studying for a qualification that will enable you to gain full employment, and hopefully you will avoid purgatory. If you get refused the DM referral, kick up a stink through the DWP complaints process and via your MP and don't take "no" for an answer.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Mr.P, I've fended off a first attempt by them to refer me to a CWP and I'll stick to my guns, thanks for the info.

 

I don't know how in all honesty they could think it would benefit me, especially after looking at the criteria for the JCP Path.

 

Third meeting today and had to correct the advisor about the "35 Hours, I had to spend job seeking." I don't know how many times I'm going to have to correct them but hopefully they'll get the message that I'm not playing!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope someone can help me or at least point me in the right direction, I’m still learning about this and want to be fully prepared.

 

My current position is that I’m post Work Programme and signed the Claimant Commitment without knowing the implications. I’ve got a relatively easy CC, and I’m getting it changed next appointment so that I don’t have to login daily to UJM. Searches are possible without logging in and I’m printing screen grabs of me logged in with the calendar up every day as proof that I’m doing that.

 

There are no exact targets as in “Apply for 6 jobs a week” just says “reasonable” so I’ve got a print of the CJSA/1814/2007 should a doubt arise.

 

Several questions for you guys, point me in the right direction if I’ve missed it as I’ve got a dozen PDFs to read through over the weekend.

 

1 - Advisor still doesn’t have the exit report from the WP and said it was my responsibility to acquire it. I thought the exit report was used to fairly determine which path you were put on. As I was pressured into CWP and refused, could this be grounds for complaint?

 

2 - Asked my Advisor for full name and position, only got the first name, and the first name of the manager. Are they all like Sting with just one name?

 

3 - Travel expenses. Paid at the end of the week or on viewing the bus ticket?

 

4 - Time taken using the PCs at the Jobcentre. Advisor is saying 30/45 mins before the daily meeting and I noted today that the floor walker was noting sign in and sign out times, so just want to cover myself?

 

Any help is much appreciated, pc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The exit report should have been given to you and a copy sent to the sanction centre I believe

First name is because their actions can be so evil they don't want an attacks on the evil ones away from the sanction centre, last names makes IT easier to find them - I got told some of this as I made a complaint against a bully

The exit report is in theory used to aid them choose the best path for you but most exit reports are empty of anything useful or about the person and are pointless

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 - Advisor still doesn’t have the exit report from the WP and said it was my responsibility to acquire it. I thought the exit report was used to fairly determine which path you were put on. As I was pressured into CWP and refused, could this be grounds for complaint?

 

4 - Time taken using the PCs at the Jobcentre. Advisor is saying 30/45 mins before the daily meeting and I noted today that the floor walker was noting sign in and sign out times, so just want to cover myself?

 

I refer you to the DWP issued guidance on completion of exit reports contained in Chapter 10:

 

6. All Exit Reports must be completed and sent to Jobcentre Plus within 10 working

days of Jobcentre Plus having submitted their request for the Exit Report.

 

Consequences 100% compliance on the timely submission of Exit Reports (within

10 working days of Jobcentre Plus making a request for the Exit Report) is a

contractual requirement. Your Performance Manager will discuss with you any failure

to meet this target.

 

Your JCP adviser is wrong. Remind him/her that the WP provider is in breach of their contract by not sending the exit report to the JCP within the specified time frame and you require him/her to escalate it to the Third Party Contacts manager. You also have the option of initiating a formal complaint using the DWP complaint process - Ask your adviser for the relevant publication.

 

Using JCP Internet Access Devices - If you have reliable and regular internet access at home, I would regard forced use of IADs to be unreasonable unless you need to print "stuff" off and do not have a printer of your own*. Perhaps another point that should be renegotiated when the subject of Claimant Commitment is raised.

 

*) If the DWP are providing printing facilities from their computers, it is worth using them to print out documents to support your position (i.e. Chapter 10, Claimant Commitment training manual) :madgrin:

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hope someone can help me or at least point me in the right direction, I’m still learning about this and want to be fully prepared.

 

There are no exact targets as in “Apply for 6 jobs a week” just says “reasonable” so I’ve got a print of the CJSA/1814/2007 should a doubt arise.

 

Yet according to their classroom training literature (links posted by me in my 'Claimant Commitment' thread on here), the CC is required to have clear and exact requirements of what is expected and not be vague or ambiguous.

 

Ask for it to be clarified - if they want 10 applications a week then it should say that so you know where you stand. We're supposed to do 'reasonable' jobsearch but what appears reasonable to one adviser might not be to another. I'm sure they've deliberately left out specifics so they can accuse us of not doing enough. Always make sure you show way, way too much evidence and play it safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Exit report....HA! I asked for mine from Ingeus about three times. I concluded it did not exist due to not being seen for weeks at a time and the fact that I saw more than half a dozen 'advisers'. How they can make out a report under such threadbare interaction escapes me. Hence the fact it is as probably as real as Nessie.

 

 

That said, other ex WP clients have told me their exit reports contained very little info, mostly of a generic nature.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do these reports state things like

 

"My client refused to take a job for 12 hours a week on minimum wage so I have concluded he/she is obstructive and not wanting to get back to work"

 

Of course what they fail to mention is for some of these people 12 hours even with added benefits available is not enough after travel and council tax and having to pay rent, not to mention they may be experienced managers who worked for companies earning in excess of £30k per annum plus bonuses. No, it is ALL the claimants fault and it is THEIR fault they were made redundant

Link to post
Share on other sites

My exit report simply said 'Client is work ready'. As I'd already had 30+ years working life before I ever went to Ingeus I nominate this for the 'Stating The Obvious' prize.

 

Mind you, I'd already warned them before I left that if they claimed to have done anything they hadn't actually done there would be a massive complaint. I think they kept it very neutral :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant info, cheers guys.

 

Has anyone recorded their meetings, audio or video? I'm thinking about it because they keep telling me wrong information and it would be handy to have it on tape.

 

Also thinking about getting a friend to accompany me just as a backup. Most of what the Advisors have to say so far has been incorrect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever since I found that my adviser had no qualms about lying to me and twisting everything I said to him I have been recording all appointments and interviews. I have caught them out in a lie several times. They don’t know it, yet. That’s why I look forward to my up-coming Tribunal Hearing. I will be insisting that the Judge adds perjury to maladministration.

I bought a small pocket sized digital recorder, under £50, I switch it on before entering DWP office., off when I get outside again. I keep it in my breast pocket where it easily picks up the conversation, sometimes I put it in the carrier bag I use to carry my papers and place it on the desk between us. When I get home I down-load the recording onto my computer, where it remains for future reference, if need be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I record everything too - caught a few of them making up guidance out of thin air so it was worth doing. I don't try and hide it either, I plonk my media player down on the desk between us when I sign on and always make a point of saying the adviser's name so it's on record. Got the Section 36 of the DP act paragraph learned by heart in case they ever say I can't record them.

 

Well worth doing by everyone. It's just sad that we have to do it at all but we need to protect ourselves from the people who are supposed to be 'helping'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi all,

 

I wonder if you could help me with some advice. I was claiming JSA and on the work programme. I signed off in 2013 due to illness and am now claiming ESA and awaiting WCA. I have attended WFIs via the phone. My Job Center rang recently and said that I have to attend a Mandatory Work Programme Completion Interview and have already said that I will have to go in to the office to see the Post Work Programme Advisor once a week. I explained that I am awaiting a WCA and she said it doesn't matter. Does anyone know whether what they are saying is correct or a mistake because in the last FOI request (November 2013) that is posted on Whatdotheyknow the guidance states that ESA claimants awaiting their initial WCA outcome should be offered a voluntary Work Programme Completion Interview. Is this still not the case or has the guidance changed?

 

Kind regards OMGOMG

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello OMG and welcome to the site. I hear you pleas to the Almighty for Divine Intervention and since He does not appear to be intervening personally, perhaps someone is blocking His registration, I thought I might take it upon myself to respond, unworthy as I am, if that is not too presumptuous.

 

Could you clarify whether or not you attended a Mandatory Work Programme Completion Interview when you signed off the WP in 2013, and when your WP attendance would have ended naturally if you had not signed off when you did?

 

Here is the Guidance that DWP gives to Work Programme Providers on how to deal with cases such as your own (Chapter 5 - WP Guidance):

 

Mandatory participant moves from JSA to ESA

32. Where you are notified that a mandatory JSA participant has ceased their requirements should be treated as the same as those of a Voluntary ESA participant until the outcome of the Work Capability Assessment (WCA)

 

This is what the Guidance says about Voluntary ESA (Chapter 2 – WP Guidance):

 

Voluntary participants - Voluntary participants are not required to take part and their participation remains on an entirely voluntary basis. You may not mandate voluntary participants to undertake activity.

 

So, as far as the Work Programme Provider is concerned, you need not take part in anything they might propose if you do not wish to do so.

 

In your case here, however, the request is to attend a Mandatory Work Programme Completion Interview at the Jobcentre, nothing to do with the WP Provider you have recently finished with. This interview is to determine your circumstances now that you have finished with WP and what, if any, the next steps should be.

 

Being, as you are now on ESA, it follows that you can’t be mandated to take part in any activity unless you do so voluntarily. I would expect that the interview you are being asked to attend would be to confirm your present circumstances and establish that you are now covered by the rules regarding voluntary participation in any activity. Not sure if attending an interview at JCP is exactly what is meant in the rule above as ‘activity’.

 

On the other hand attending the Jobcentre weekly after a Mandatory Work Programme Completion Interview could be said to be an activity that is covered by the voluntary rules and that is a question you could clarify during the interview that you are being asked to attend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...