Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

old cap1 debt, CCJ, then CO, charges reclaiming.


giveITallback
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3450 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I got a CCJ and didn't defend it in time.

 

The judgment was entered and since then Robinson Way have gone for a charge on my property.

 

I have tried to stop that by offering to pay something in installments.

 

The case has had to be moved from our local courts to one in the nearest city as it has closed down.

 

What I would likt to know is is there any way I can perhaps ask the claimant to produce documents

 

and if they fail have the case set aside or has it gone way past that now?

 

Hope someone with some knowledge can lend a hand to a normal joe.

Edited by giveITallback
spellings
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, thanks for the response.

 

I think I didn't get much time after the letter came really late.

 

We get problems with our mail and two other properties with very similar addresses.

One has them same post code but is a different block of flats.

 

We are actually talking with the council as a group regarding a brand new Post Code being created for one of the propeties.

I guess I knew I couldn't prepare a defence in time and just thought I'd lost this one :(

 

I am the home owner well with the bank of course and it's just in my name.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, sorry you havent received more response to this.

 

The problem as i see it is that clearly there WAS a window where you COULD have done something,

you state yourself you felt you didnt have enough time and did nothing.

 

A judge would clearly see the time taken to receive the letter as a valid argument

however he/she would ask why you did nothing when you did receive it...

you could have applied for more time for responding from both the plaintiff and then the court.

 

The fact you accepted it counts against you imho.

 

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well you might be able to convince a judge that you didnt know the legalities

and didnt have enough time to find a solicitor but I do feel its a long shot.. sorry!

 

Its easy for me to make comments that you should have done this or that and please dont take offence...

its just people dont realise that the courts are just like a business in reality

and they have no connection with people until it gets to a hearing in front of a judge (if you get a good judge)

 

If proper process is not followed even if you dont know that proper process then the end result is judgment in default.

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK s pointless looking into that and making sure the claimant had all the relevant docs.

 

Another question then if I may.

 

I got a CCJ over 6 years ago that I'm still paying off monthly.

 

1 - Do I need to carry on paying this after 6 years?

2 - If the CCJ jas not been satisfied does it still remain on your credit file until it is even after 6 years?

 

Cheers

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK s pointless looking into that and making sure the claimant had all the relevant docs. Another question then if I may. I got a CCJ over 6 years ago that I'm still paying off monthly.

 

1 - Do I need to carry on paying this after 6 years?

2 - If the CCJ jas not been satisfied does it still remain on your credit file until it is even after 6 years?

 

Cheers

 

It drops off you credit file automatically and the trust register after 6 years although the creditor can re-register it on your credit file, sometimes they dont...

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Hi,

 

I have an old Credit Card that became A CCJ nearly 2 years ago.

 

 

I did at the time fill in a defence albeit they said it didn't arrive in the alloted time and judgement was entered.

 

 

I wondered if there is any point in trying to figure out if there is anything that should of prevented it from going to court.

 

 

It was a default for nearly 6 years before the CCJ so it's going to be on my file for 10-11 years in total.

 

Any advice would be great.

 

 

I did do a CCA request and have a copy of that but it's a photcopy of a page from 2002

and the rest is a print out of general terms.

 

 

There are many late charges and interest on the account around the time of the default.

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I see the CCJ and the interest/charges as being separate issues. Whoever applied the interest and charges are responsible for dealing with any complaint you have. So obtain the details by making an SAR request and then once you have the details make a complaint. Follow up with the FOS, if they don't resolve.

 

If you want to re-open the CCJ,I think that would be difficult 2 years down the line.

 

Nb. Having said that, you might want to check with the FOS, whether they would look into a complaint, where the debt had already been to court and ended up with a CCJ by default. I know the FOS won't touch a debt where a court is dealing, but wonder if they would look at an issue, that a court never considered.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court didn't consider anything as such as I said the defence apparantly arrived too late with them. Also the amount before court is around £3k and after court 4k :( is this the norm?

 

Cheers

 

An extra £1k after a default CCJ, seems quite high. I presume that they claimed £3k, plus 8% interest for the relevant period and then the costs of issuing the court claim ?

 

Speak to the FOS, to see if they would accept a complaint about charges/interest if you could not resolve with the original creditor, if a debt collection agency had since obtain a CCJ by default. If they would, then make a note of the persons name for future reference.

 

Then make a complaint about charges/interest on the card account to the original creditor. Probably best to SAR them before you complain to get hold of the details, as they may not deal with the SAR properly if you complain at the same time. Ideally your complaint needs to be informed with details of the charges/interest. They would have 8 weeks to resolve and if you are then not satisfied, take your complaint to the FOS, with a note of the name of the FOS person who agreed they would look at it.

 

That is what I would do for now. You never know, you may be rebated some of the charges and you can use this to pay towards the CCJ.

 

If you want to look at the CCJ again, then I would suggest that you obtain a copy of the court files on this, to see if the procedures were properly followed, in regard to allowing enough time. You could also send an SAR to the debt collection agency for a copy of their records. Then see if there is any reason you can find, to request a set aside or other action.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers, I'll do all that. I've not made any payments to the CCJ yet either although they have a charging order against the property.

 

Also is there a problem with the site as I can't find two of my more recent threads when looking at all my posts since I joined (these threads have had several replied so definately exist), the search box also doesn't work either saying database errors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers, I'll do all that. I've not made any payments to the CCJ yet either although they have a charging order against the property.

 

Also is there a problem with the site as I can't find two of my more recent threads when looking at all my posts since I joined (these threads have had several replied so definately exist), the search box also doesn't work either saying database errors.

 

I believe with a charging order it depends on how this is registered. Some require the claimant to be notified after the house is sold and others require the claimant to be paid out of the proceeds from the house sale. I have read a number of cases on here, where people have been able to sell their houses and their solicitors have found out the charging order did not require the claimant to be paid.

 

I think it might be wise to leave contacting the DCA, until after you have looked into the charges/interest with the original creditor. Contacting them might just provoke them into asking whether you want to make any repayments.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
I see the CCJ and the interest/charges as being separate issues. Whoever applied the interest and charges are responsible for dealing with any complaint you have. So obtain the details by making an SAR request and then once you have the details make a complaint. Follow up with the FOS, if they don't resolve.

 

If you want to re-open the CCJ,I think that would be difficult 2 years down the line.

 

Nb. Having said that, you might want to check with the FOS, whether they would look into a complaint, where the debt had already been to court and ended up with a CCJ by default. I know the FOS won't touch a debt where a court is dealing, but wonder if they would look at an issue, that a court never considered.

 

Hi, I have found my statements from the OC so is it worth sending off a SAR still?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

Hi,

 

almost 4 years ago I received a CCJ for a credit card (Capital One).

 

 

I had previously sent a CCA request and received a photocopy of my signature with a printed on (by them) confirmation of my address.

 

 

On that signature page non of their original wording was legible as it was too small and a poor copy.

Attached was a copy of what I assume were the current t&c's at the time.

They were certainly not the original terms as they referred to chip and pin for a start

which wasn't rolled out until more than 2 years after I'd taken out the agreement in 2002.

 

 

There was no mention of any credit limit and the interest rates formed part of the typed up t&c's with no evidence

they were on the original agreement form and therefore the actual ones at the time.

 

The original CCJ contained unfair interest and charges too

 

Is there anything I can do about the CCJ based on the CCA being iffy?

 

It eventually ended up with a charging order being put against the property a few years back.

I went to a hearing but the judge spoke in tongue I didn't understand

and ultimately I missed an opportunity to avoid the charging order by making monthly payments.

 

I'll need to remortgage my property in the next 12 months to reduce the monthly payments

and wondered if there's anything I can do about the charge or should I ring up Robinson way

and see if'll they accept a one off reduced payment to clear the debt.

 

 

I notice there's been around £1600 added to the amount since the CCJ/hearings. :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...