Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Looking after son with no income support or child benefit and no money!!!!


trout
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3445 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

My brother recently split with his partner ( over three months ago ).He now lives apart from her with my young nephew.He was the sole carer for the first 6 weeks ( approx ).

 

They then went to Court over custody and an intrim order gave residency to my brother with my nephew stopping with his mother for two nights a week.

 

The court has now decided upon indefinite 50/50 residency.

 

Throughout my brother has not received any financial support other than a couple of small crisis payments and the odd food parcel.

 

He has been told that he cannot get IS because he needs to be in receipt of the Child Benefit, which we assume his ex is getting.

 

He has been to his MP but has still not received any financial support.

 

Can this be right ?

 

Also, as custody is now split with each having my nephew for 5 days at a time, how

are future benefits going to be paid ie for 5 days my brother cannot work but then for 5 days he could / can the Child Benifit be split at source etc

 

BTW my nephew is 27 months old.

 

thoughts please .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Child benefit and child tax credits can only be paid to one parent.

 

For tax credits (I'm not sure if child benefit is the same) If both parents make an attempt to claim then a questionnaire is sent asking various questions to establish who they deem the 'main carer' to be. They would ask about what address doctors/dentists/schools (where applicable) have for the child, who buys certain things etc.

 

http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/tctmanual/TCTM02204.htm

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not asking this question be rude, but why can't he work? Plenty of people with young children do and there are benefits to support seeking work and once in work. Or if there are other reasons he cannot work eg illness or disabilities then there are benefits for this too.

 

Was he working before they separated?

 

Unfortunately income support is not my area, I know more about tax credits (and some child benefit) but it does sound correct. Income support can be claimed by lone parents, if he is not receiving any benefots for a child then I don't think they'd deem him a lone parent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No he was not working before they separated, as he was at home looking after my nephew ( another story )

 

 

Are you saying he can get help to pay for a child minder whilst he is at work and my nephew ( pre school age ) is at home ?

 

 

thanks,

 

 

trout

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is help through tax credits if he works 16 hours or more. They would pay up to 70% of the costs (based on income) if using a registered childcare provider/minder.

 

However to consider this tax credits would need to accept him as being the main carer for the child.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks again bb,you have been very informative,

 

But do you or anybody know how my brother or his ex partner can be deemed the main carer in a 50/50 residence split ?

 

ie schools will be x 2, doctor,dentist etc x 2 child expenditure ie clothes,toys, food etc 50/50

 

cheers,

 

trout

Link to post
Share on other sites

To be honest I've never seen a true 50:50 split. There has always been one parent that's had something over the other.

 

Best thing for him to do, in my opinion, would be to try to apply and allow them to decide.

 

If you google benefits and shared custody there are other pages/threads etc.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be worth looking at the information on the gingerbread website. Lots of fact sheets and advice there. :)

  • Confused 1
The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Any update yet?

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...