Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

GE Money charges claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3150 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

you cant add simple int after compounded it is one or the other.

 

 

IMHO for a GE money loan,

you take the aPR from the agreement

 

 

you are very much over complicating things.

 

 

you've now made me doubt your PPI% too

 

 

is the £2011.41 with or without interest

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right i'll simplify the charges claim back to the initial 14.58% listed on the credit agreement and scrap the averages idea - phew!

 

The ppi 2011.41 was the cost of ppi that was added to the start of the loan, i'm happy with the calculations on that one

Link to post
Share on other sites

good on the charges

 

 

the PPI

 

 

is that £2011.41 with or without their int?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Without...... initial loan amount £16k + ppi 2011.41 so the total starting loan value was £18011.41. Thats the starting figure on the sar and then credits/debits/interest/charges start from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

then the PPIPCM was 12.57% not 11

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget that

you are correct

 

 

was on a small screen.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

although there is nothing to stop you issuing an LBA

 

 

ideally certainly on the PPI claim

they are entitled to 8 weeks

 

 

as for the penalty charges, unless you indicated that they only had XX days

again, they do under industry guidelines have 8 weeks too

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely right, they do follow industry standard and their complaints procedure states:

 

"3. If your complaint is still outstanding after four weeks, we will contact you to let you

know why we have been unable to provide you with a response, the actions we

are taking and an anticipated time when we will be able to reply to you.

4. We will aim to provide you with a final response to your complaint within eight

weeks of receipt."

 

In respect of my ppi complaint they have not acknowledged the complaint within the stated 4 weeks so lba giving the balance of the 8 weeks to resolve the complaint positively.

 

On the charges claim, had the standard final response today, saying time barred under the 6 year Limitations Act rule. so lba going tomorrow and a rough reminder that it was a secured loan so its a 12 year rule and cough up. Reading up the Act too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

wish you every success.

 

 

they need nailing badly.

 

 

disgusting company

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

re: charges claim, lba going tomorrow. Now that i have received their final response, the 8 weeks rule is over so i have given them 14 days to respond. Quoted the fact that it was a secured loan so contract made 'under seal' and 12 years to claim from the Limitations Act 1980 as it is classed as a speciality. Told them that their final response was an attempt to mislead me and falsely deny the claim too.

 

Lets see what happens next.......................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well had some replies.

 

On the charges, got a letter just saying I have had their final response and can refer to the FLA if I want to despite the fact that I reminded them of the 12 year rule. So, thoughts on the FLA please folks??

 

On the ppi, had the standard letter thanking me for raising concerns and they will investigate within 8 weeks. So they are either going to deny receiving the complaint in May and an lba for not responding after 4 weeks and just take the lba as the start or, it's just a stalling tactic..............

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the final response from GE about my ppi claim now. They say they provided the finance for the ppi but did not sell it and the underwriter is Cardiff Pinnacle and it was sold by Central Marketing Ltd, who are now no longer trading. So, is this all over now, or do I go for Pinnacle or are GE stalling?

 

Thoughts please folks??

 

Also, are the FLA any good for the charges claim??

Link to post
Share on other sites

FSCS then.?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll have to do some research on this I reckon. Lots to look at about companies 'in default' and registered with what organisation etc. So far Companies House show Central Marketing as ordered to wind up in the late 1980's so how did they sell me insurance in 2002?? I'll keep digging.............

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 1 month later...

Please excuse me as im new to this.Ive had quite a few charges (40.00) a time for being in arreas on my mortgage but have not attempted to claim as the mortgage is still running.

 

 

1) can I claim back these charges as I know banks had to lower theres for being un fair.. If so can anyone advise me as to how to go about this.

 

 

2)Is this advisable as I still have the mortgage with them.

 

 

thankyou for any help in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please excuse me as im new to this.Ive had quite a few charges (40.00) a time for being in arreas on my mortgage but have not attempted to claim as the mortgage is still running.

 

 

1) can I claim back these charges as I know banks had to lower theres for being un fair.. If so can anyone advise me as to how to go about this.

 

 

2)Is this advisable as I still have the mortgage with them.

 

 

thankyou for any help in advance.

best you start a new thread

 

 

of your own

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...