Jump to content



  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • "These are certainly not the persuasive decisions that this Claimant may suggest." Well worded.   I would add that as VCS have been  active in Airports over the years  that one would  expect they would be familiar with the Airports Act which would call into question the accuracy of their WS.   By questioning their WS you are hoping that VCS might decide not to turn up in Court [giving you a walkover] as they might not want the Judge looking closely at their WS. Also it would not be good for them should you win your case based on the Airports Act as it will have other Courts  kicking out other Airport cases hitting them in the pocket.    
    • Hi,   Still no response. I have my Liability Order hearing in a few days time, I was hoping I might have been able to receive a response from either my local councillor or the leader of the council before then. I wonder if they are just going to ignore my email?   Walshy    
    • I have got an  independent expert report which clearly states it is a manufacturing fault, which DFS have been made aware of.   My point is that as a huge retailer of leather sofas with leather peeling  being a common complaint to me it seems evident they are aware it is a manufacturing fault on their side. Yet they play games with customers and worse of all try their level best to get the customer to believe that it is their fault due to oils or creams they are using.   Even if one is to believe that every day creams etc can cause this damage then in any event the sofas are not fit for purpose.   Surely they are merely playing a numbers game banking on the fact that most complainants will not follow through with legal action. Yet what about the anguish and distress they cause to customers in the process.   To me this shows alot of contempt towards consumers and is clearly unethical.
    • I would if I could tobyjugg  Did the same run today over an hour quicker than yesterday, thats what happens when you know where to go and not just try finding places with the postcode as I was yesterday
    • Thank you, @lookinforinfo. I have updated the VCS v Ward case as below:   VCS v Ward     1.       This case is often quoted by the claimant as assisting their case. However, in this instance it actually assists mine. It is contended that the act of stopping a vehicle does not amount to parking. This predatory operation pays no regard to the byelaws at all. It is likely that this Claimant may try to rely upon two 'trophy case' wins, namely VCS v Crutchley and/or VCS v Ward, neither of which were at an Airport location, which is not 'relevant land'. The airport land is subject to the Airport Byelaws as specified in 'Section 63' of the Airports Act 1986 [EXHIBIT A]. Both cases involve flawed reasoning, and the Courts were wrongly steered by this Claimant's representative; there are worrying errors in law within those cases, such as an irrelevant reliance upon the completely different Supreme Court case. These are certainly not the persuasive decisions that this Claimant may suggest.   63 Airport byelaws. (2) Any such byelaws may, in particular, include byelaws— (d) for regulating vehicular traffic anywhere within the airport, except on roads within the airport to which the road traffic enactments apply, and in particular (with that exception) for imposing speed limits on vehicles within the airport and for restricting or regulating the parking of vehicles or their use for any purpose or in any manner specified in the byelaws;
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

AK/Judge & Priestley - claimform - old MBNA card 'debt'


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1868 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Yes as per my post #169 above

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 229
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I cant read your draft its too small...but if you have used my template and assuming you have read my post # 187 then it must be ok.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Attach a copy to the DQ and send the claimant a copy of the DQ and Draft.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

Hi everyone, hope you had a good Easter.

 

I have received the attached document

 

 

requesting I send standard disclosure of documents by list...what is this?

 

 

I wish they'd speak in plain English.

 

 

Should this be sent to court or to Aktiv Kapital?

 

Am I right in understanding that if AK fail to send this then the case may be dismissed?

 

 

I keep hoping they'll back out or fail to provide what is requested....

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi everyone, hope you had a good Easter.

 

I have received the attached document

 

Courts Directions

 

requesting I send standard disclosure of documents by list...what is this? Standard Disclosure...normal process

 

I wish they'd speak in plain English.

 

 

Should this be sent to court or to Aktiv Kapital? Both at the different dates stated within the directions

 

Am I right in understanding that if AK fail to send this then the case may be dismissed? Yes and if you fail to comply... your defence struck out

 

 

I keep hoping they'll back out or fail to provide what is requested....

 

Dont miss any Direction and date to be complied with

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so standard disclosure needs to be sent to AK by 4pm on the 14th, is that correct?

 

 

On the standard disclosure I had to Google it to get the definition (still struggling with the terminology).

 

 

Do I just send the CCA and CPR requests that I sent last year?

Standard disclosure – what documents are to be disclosed

 

31.6 Standard disclosure requires a party to disclose only–

(a) the documents on which he relies; and

(b) the documents which –

(i) adversely affect his own case;

(ii) adversely affect another party’s case; or

(iii) support another party’s case; and

© the documents which he is required to disclose by a relevant practice direction.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ok so standard disclosure needs to be sent to AK by 4pm on the 14th, is that correct?

 

 

On the standard disclosure I had to Google it to get the definition (still struggling with the terminology).

 

 

Do I just send the CCA and CPR requests that I sent last year?

Standard disclosure – what documents are to be disclosed

 

31.6 Standard disclosure requires a party to disclose only–

(a) the documents on which he relies; and

(b) the documents which;

(i) adversely affect his own case;

(ii) adversely affect another party case; or

(iii) support another partys case; and

© the documents which he is required to disclose by a relevant practice direction.

 

 

Anything in support or relied upon or referred to within your defence or witness statement.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good morning everyone.

 

I have just dropped in my defence from the original MCOL filing, could someone confirm that the sections I have highlighted below are those that I should be asking for proof of in my standard disclosure? Also is it ok to copy this as a list into the document asking for the proof supporting my defence?

 

"The claimant claims the sum of 13,xxx for debt and interest.

 

1. On xx.09.1997 the defendant entered into an agreement with MBNA for a credit card under reference4129xxx.

2. On xx.08.2009 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of 10,xxx.

3. On xx.09.2009 the debt of 10,xxx was assigned to Varde Investments(Ireland) Ltd, who itself assigned the debt to Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS ZugBrand on xx.03.2012.

4. Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with s136 Lawof Property Act 1925.

 

And the claimant claims

1. The sum of 10,xxx

2. Staututory interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 ata rate of 8.00% per annum from 3.3.12 to 17.10.14 2,309.58 and thereafter at adaily rate of 2.41 until judgement or sooner payment

 

 

Defence

 

1. The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and genericin nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPRr 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specificresponse has not been made.

 

2. Paragraph 1 is denied with regards to an amount due under an agreement (s).The Claimant/Solicitor has refused to disclose any agreement/s or statements on which its claim relies upon.

 

3. I am unaware of any legal assignment/s the claimant refers to within its particulars and deny the notice was served pursuant to the Law of Property Act 1925.

 

On receipt of this claim I requested information pertaining to this claim byway of a CPR 31.14. To date I have yet to receive a compliant response. This was posted on the 10.11.2014 .To date I have had no response.

 

On receipt of this claim I requested information pertaining to this claim byway of a Section 78 request/s. I have yet to receive a response complying with the request. To date they have failed to comply and remain in default.

 

Therefore with the courts permission the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a)Show and disclose how the Defendant has entered into an agreement(s); and

 

(b) Show and disclose how the Claimant has reached the amount(s) claimed for;

 

© Show how the agreement(s) were breached/ terminated to allow the claimantrelief.

 

(d) Show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equityto issue a claim;

 

4. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5, it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

5. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer crediticon Act1974.

 

6. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief"

Edited by Andyorch
Standard disclosure in bold red
Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to answer all of their 4 paragraphs

so where are replies to 2, 3 & 4?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have marked the only two documents that you will be disclosing in bold red....

 

This is standard disclosure by you ....not the claimant...they will send you their list on receipt of yours......dont list your defence..they already have a copy.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

So do I not need to worry about the other three questions now? I thought they had to be done by the dates stated.

 

I just want to address this now so I know I get it right

 

Andy, could I please just clarify that I list what I will be submitting as my defence being my correspondence asking them for the CPR 31.14 and Section 78 request. Do I state they have still yet to reply? Do I need to include copies of the original requests?

 

So sorry for so many quetsions

Link to post
Share on other sites

What 3 other questions?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't the foggiest what DX is referring to or advising......this is standard disclosure...nothing to do with your defence or asking for further disclosure.

 

Just remind me is this Fast Track?

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay are you using the N265 to list your disclosures?

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?421287-LEGAL-N265-Standard-Disclosure-**Correct-as-at-March-2014**

 

On page 3 (the only part applicable to the defendant) list...

 

CPR 31.14 dated xxxxxx

 

Section 78 request dated xxxxxx

 

Send to the claimant and ask them to reciprocate...once (if) they reply they will send you theirs which will list what they wish to rely on...you then ask them for anything on their list you want ...they wont ask you as they already have them...and you exchange documents by the date stated within your Notice of Allocation Directions....

 

job done.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes thats fine.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...