Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

AK/Judge & Priestley - claimform - old MBNA card 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3017 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Thanks for merging the threads. Please see below:

 

Name of the Claimant ? - Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS ZUG

Date of issue – top right hand corner of the claim form – this in order to establish the time line you need to adhere to. - 20 Oct 2014

Date of issue 20.10.2014 + 19 days ( 5 day for service + 14 days to acknowledge) = 08.11.2014 + 14 days to submit defence = 22.11.2014 (33 days in total)

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

Please type out their particulars of claim (verbatim)

less any identifiable data and round the amounts up/down. -

 

 

The claimant claims the sum of 13,000 for debt and interest.

On 30.09.1997 the defendant entered into an agreement with MBNA for a credit card

under reference XXX.

On 31.08.2009 the defendant defaulted on the agreement with an outstanding balance of 11,000.

On 24.09.2009 the debt of 11,000 was assigned to Varde Investments (Ireland) Ltd,

who itself assigned the debt to Aktiv Kapital Portfolio AS Zug Brand on 03.03.2012.

Notices of assignment were sent to the defendant in accordance with s136 Law of Property Act 1925.

 

And the claimant claims

1. The sum of 11,000

2. Staututory interest pursuant to Section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8.00% per annum

from 3.3.12 to 17.10.14 2,300 and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.41 until judgement or sooner payment

What is the value of the claim? 13,300 plus 410 court fee and 100 solicitors costs = 13,810

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? - credit card

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? - before 2007

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. - debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? - I can't recall

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? - possibly back in 2009

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? - not that I can recall but I can't be 100% sure about this

Why did you cease payments:- I wasn't working

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? - no but I have not contacted them about PPI

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan?

- Yes but MBNA refused. This was all done by phone. I asked if I could reduce my payments but they just refused

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 229
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

1997 this is a joke

they'll never get the agreement

 

 

AOS the claim - defend all

 

 

sent AK a CCA request

 

 

and the sols a CPR

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to ack the claim on mcol

 

 

defend all

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

forget the response pack do it all online.

 

 

comeback when aos is done and acked

leave juris unticked

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you've done post 102?

 

and aos ?

 

so now time to read around here.

 

who's the sols?

 

just don't miss defence filing date

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh no I forgot to send AK a CCA requistion

 

 

and the solicitors a CPR, sorry not sure what the CPR is.

 

 

If I do it tomorrow and they receive Tuesday will I be ok?

 

 

I'm just thinking the CCA request gives them 28 days to reply.

 

 

I need to file defence by 22.11.2014.

 

 

Is there any possibility of asking for extensions to this?

 

The solicitors is Judge & Priestley.

 

I'm also going on holiday on 25th November

Link to post
Share on other sites

cpr 31:14 is in the legal section of the green library tab top left

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can agree an extra 28 days on your defence date using CPR 15.5 with the claimants agreement...but then you will have to deal with it all through Christmas.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

cpr 31:14 is in the legal section of the green library tab top left

 

 

dx

 

Can I check I have the right one as it refers to a current account

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?387483-LEGAL-CPR-31.14-Request-when-Claim-is-being-made-for-a-Current-Account

 

You can agree an extra 28 days on your defence date using CPR 15.5 with the claimants agreement...but then you will have to deal with it all through Christmas.

 

Oh yes I'd rather get it out of the way I think

 

Hi, could you please check my CPR letter is correct?

 

 

[removed]

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

That CPR states "Although your claim is for a sum which is not morethan £10,000.00 and will in all likelihood be allocated to the smallclaims" the claim is for over £13k

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then remove that line as advised in the CPR 31 template

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes its fine providing they have referred to the documents within their particulars (1 -5)

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

list the docs they refer to in their PoC

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

no's

1,

2,

3,

5

 

 

of the link andy sent you.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

 

I have received the attached from a different company regarding the CCA request.

 

 

I've had no reponse from the solicitors regarding the CPR request and the 7 days was up yesterday.

 

 

I also need to file my defence on Friday and have little to defend with right now...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I have received the attached from a different company regarding the CCA request. I've had no reponse from the solicitors regarding the CPR request and the 7 days was up yesterday. I also need to file my defence on Friday and have little to defend with right now...

 

[ATTACH]54382[/ATTACH]

 

as stated the new name of Aktiv Kapital, maybe they did not like the mis-spelling of Aktiv Krapital?/

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...