Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wise2Debt/Lloyd Anderson had £1500 - FOS ordered them pay it back - they have not!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3467 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In 2011,

 

 

MBNA got a bit heavy with my husband by doubling his minimum payments

even when he said he couldn't afford them.

 

 

He got a phone call a week or so later from a company called Wise 2 Debt

who claimed to be a government funded debt management company

who would deal with the MBNA on his behalf and get the interest frozen

and to ignore any letters from MBNA and they would deal with it

if he just paid them a fixed amount every month.

 

 

An agreement was made and the letters kept coming from MBNA but they were ignored, as advised.

 

 

Eventually he rang MBNA who said that hey hadn't received any payments at all

 

 

when he had paid Wise 2 Debt approx.

 

 

£1500 over the best part of a year.

 

 

He was served with a default notice which shouldn't be there as he was paying it

 

 

but they weren't passing on the money.

 

 

Wise 2 Debt shut down and re-opened as Lloyd Anderson.

 

 

We wrote to the Ombudsmen who agreed that Lloyd Anderson should refund the money

but we are still waiting over a year later since they told them this.

 

If any one could advise me as to

a) who is the authority on these matters

and who can force them to cough up, and

 

 

b) how would we go about getting the default notice removed from his credit record?

 

 

Any advice much appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you were not paying the contracted amount

the default is sadly correct. regardless to the DMP/DMC

 

 

have you told the FOS you've not had the money yet?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for your reply.

I understand that the MBNA are entitled to issue a default if they don't receive the money

but (sorry should have said before) Wise 2 Debt did actually send a re-payment proposal to MBNA which they accepted,

does that make any difference?

 

 

Yes the FOS are aware that the money hasn't been repaid -

ages and ages ago Lloyd Anderson agreed to pay up but wanted to do it in monthly instalments of £100 which was relayed to us by the FOS.

 

 

This was declined by us and to be honest I think they had no intention of even paying that, they just wanted to shut us up.

 

 

The FOS are still apparently on the case but I thought there might be another body with a bit of clout

who could force them to refund and then shut them down for malpractice.

 

 

I was thinking about letting the police know they are fraudsters but not sure if there's any point as I know how devious and slippery these shysters can be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

give the FCA a ring.

 

 

as for MBNA they are entitled to default you

you entered a DMP, regardless to if they agreed.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...