Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claimform Arrows/Drydens - Credit card 'debt'


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3434 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help/advise me please?

 

 

I have severe anxiety and depression and this sudden out of nowhere scenario is taking me to the edge.

.. (I've had to increase my medication..)

 

I won't waffle about my life story..

., but it's a roller coaster one..

but I suppose aren't they all?

 

I have received a claim form from northampton county court.

 

 

The claimant is a DCA.

 

 

I have till 21/10/14 to decide what to do (including the 5 days after issue date). Today is 19/10/14.

 

 

The claim form seems real (blue with claim number top right and court symbol top left).

It is electronically signed by Solicitors.

 

I have checked my credit report and the default date is 5 years from being dropped off.

 

The amount is for £2000 and is a credit card.

But it looks like DCA has purchased it.

 

I am not a homeowner nor employed.

I have been homeless in past.

 

Is it too late to make a final settlement with debt agency/solicitor if I gave them 10%? (my sister has offered to help)

or has the county court process already started?

 

Should I just ignore?

But I don't wan't a CCJ marked on my credit file as trying to fix my life.

 

Should I challenge?

 

Any help, advice, guidance much much appreciated..

 

Again Thank You

Edited by newlifeahead
Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

02 OCT 2014

1. The claim is for the sum of xxxx in respect of monies owing by the defendant on a credit agreement held by

defendant with Sainsbury Bank PLC under acount xxxxxx upon which defendant failed to maintain payments.

 

2. A default notice was served upon the defendant and has not been complied with.

 

3. By virtue of a sale agreement between Sainsbury Bank PLC and the claimant Cabot

the claim vested in the claimant who has a genuine commercial interest.

The defendant has been notified of the assignment by letter.

What is the value of the claim? A: £2,000

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account? A: Credit Card

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? A: Entered January 2007

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned

and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. A: Debt purchaser

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? A: Don't know

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? A: Don't know

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? A: No

Why did you cease payments:- A: Loss of income

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? A: No

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementicon plan?

 

 

A: There was some DMP agreement made with 3rd party.

But have forgotten the details. This was approx 4 years back.

Edited by newlifeahead
Link to post
Share on other sites

claimforn date top right please too

 

 

and name names no need to hide now

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello sorry to bother again...

 

What do you think I should do?

 

a) A chance to defend

b) Too late to submit a final settlement directly to claimant (the ccj process already started) on monday morning

 

I have one working day left of service days window.......

Link to post
Share on other sites

what/who was the original debt please with

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you must ACK the claim - defend all-

 

 

regardless on MCOL.

 

 

else you'll get a CCJ by default.

 

 

goto MCOL site

 

 

create a registration

note the long number.

 

 

then log in using that

 

 

enter the required details from the claim

select AOS.

 

 

comeback when done

 

 

you need to get a CCA request off to cabot ASAP

 

 

and a CPR 31:14 off to drydens in the library tab [top left] then legal section.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't tick juris

when done simple exit mcol

you should get an ack msg copy it somewhere as proof of AOS

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

who was the card with

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

How many days do I have now? Issue date on form is 03/10/14. I've put acknowledgment through 19/10/14 to defend all.

 

Also, do I have to inform the courts of anything in meantime?

 

With the information given, do I have a chance with CCA and CPR 31:14?

 

Ay link to letter templates?

 

Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 8 click the CCA link

 

 

cpr is in the library section

 

 

you have informed the court via AOS

 

 

you should get an ack of that being done

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you go get your credit file please

 

 

and tell us the details of the debt from there too

 

 

noddle [below] is free.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can they roll all debts into one on a single ccj claim? Yes

 

Shouldn't it be for individual debts?

No

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Same situation.

 

Which letters did you send off for defence?

 

What have the courts done in meantime? With the original claim? Set aside / thrown out? Still live?

 

Same situation, maybe same debt purchaser and solicitor too , but you will need to start your own thread please to get advice tailored to your own situation as the two cases will be bound to diverge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

posts from another thread moved here

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

I have located the CCA and CPR templates as instructed. I will complete them and print off. But I'm a bit stuck with the time frame of things...

 

My Issue date on claim form is: 2/10/14

I acknowledged claim/submitted defence online: 19/10/14

 

a) How much time do I have to file defence/communicate with DCA and solicitor?

b) Apparently 10 days are needed between each letter, as I'm pushed for time, can I still send letters? Will they be accepted?

c) Does the following for CCA letter affect me? "the timescale for providing this is 12+2 WORKING DAYS. If it is not sent within this timescale they are in default of your request."

d) How much time do I give them to respond?

 

Can they simply turn around and say did not give us enough time to look/respond?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you must file your defence regardless by mon 3rd midnight

 

 

you still send off the CCA + CPR

 

 

cpr they don't have to respond too

CCA they do.

 

 

it should have been done when you got the claim form

 

 

but anyway send it off

you will prob still be filing the holding/no paperwork defence

regardless to the timescale of the CCA.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"you will prob still be filing the holding/no paperwork defence

regardless to the timescale of the CCA."

 

Would you say that is the likely route,

seeming that the alleged agreement started before April 2007

before the consumer credit act 2006 came into effect

where a signed agreement is needed to be shown before court.

 

Or am I jumping the gun here?.... 4 days non-stop research I think I'm getting there :!:

 

Again Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

as said

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...