Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • thanks ae - yes  I understand the claims are between me and the lender.  But with regards to the order for sale the judge specifically said it is the receiver who is appointed to sell - and he hasn't/ and isn't - which is why I am asking if I can apply to the court v the receiver for an order for sale right now?   The receiver is not part of the current proceedings heading to trial.  But he is responsible for selling the property - and he has consistently rejected offers over >5y.   This is specifically why I would like to understand if I can apply to the court to enforce the sale by the receiver??? As above - The judge has said otherwise the order for sale v the lender has to be dealt with via the trial.  Which they have deliberately delayed via the adjournment. Valuation is an issue. The lender chose the valuer.  I paid but his report basically belongs to and is referred to by the lender.  He did a prof valuation without doing a site visit.  He had done a site visit 5 months earlier for different potential lender.  The 1st valuation he erroneously wrote in his report as fh.  He just did a re-write 5m later - but wrote in his report that the value was the same for lh. I had a great offer on the table from a niche buyer which would have cleared the loan and given me a lot of £s.  But the lender rushed through the repo and the buyer got spooked and ran.  The lender then slashed the price by 30%+ from their valuation (fire sale price?).  As you suggest - they fully expected potential buyers to quickly grab the property at such a discount.  But it turned out they couldn't.  The market had dropped anyway. Then covid hit.  Every potential buyer was questioning the valuation (which clearly was wrong but the lender had accepted).  The lender and receivers actions have eroded the equity.  This wouldn't make sense to any normal lender.  99.9% would have just sold to the 1st buyer willing to transact.  The lender/ receiver had such a willing buyer on day 1 of marketing.  But they spent 15months trying not to sell to them.  As I said, disclosure shows the ceo wanted (wants?) to keep it for himself - so common sense didn't (doesn't) prevail.   The lender has made a £ Claim v me.  I am disputing it because I maintain it is their actions that has caused the erosion of equity/ a debt to accrue. The lender's problem now is that they have spent so much money and added so much interest over 5y that they cannot sell the property for what they need/ want.  They are trying to blame me for this.  But it is their fault; not mine - because I am not in possession or in charge of selling it. As I also said above - if there is some legal reason why I cannot make an application to the court for an order for the receiver to sell - then can I ask the other entity which has a charging order and threatened to do so ???  I will contact this other entity only if I can't make an app to sell v the receiver    
    • We registered our child with a nursery last year for a June 2024 start date. This was before how the new 15 hours free childcare was going to work. At the time my wife paid a £50 deposit. A few weeks ago they sent out an email about how the new funding was going to work. The nurseries can use it as they wish and they said if the child wants to come for one full day we still have to pay £50 and we can't use all the hours for one day. They also drastically increased their day rate. As a result of this we were looking elsewhere and have found a much cheaper nursery so we are changing.  The original nursery now said you only get the deposit back if she starts because it comes out of the first month of fees. I don't think we filled any any form or anything so there were no terms and conditions. Are we entitled to get the deposit back or is it our fault for not asking what the terms were when we paid. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Noddle credit report showing CCJ


castigers
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3464 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

 

I recently signed up to noddle to check my credit report.

 

 

I noticed that I have a CCJ issued against me on the 15/05/2014.

 

 

A case number is provided but no company name shows.

I would also like to point out that this CCJ is registered with my previous address.

 

I would like assistance or to be guided in the right way to deal with this issue.

 

I didn't know that a CCJ was going to be issued.

I moved out of the address it's listed against on the 28/09/2013

so any paper work relating to this would have been sent there

and I had no knowledge that a case was to be heard.

 

I can provide proof by a tenancy agreement showing the date that I moved out of that address.

 

Is there anything that I can do to try and resolve this issue?

 

thank you in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the debt yours? Who is the creditor?

 

Had you had any previous dealings with the original creditor, or the claimant in the case?

 

You could apply to set aside the CCJ on the grounds that the paperwork was not received

- that is certainly a valid reason, but as to whether it would be successful would depend on whether you had a viable defence

with a reasonable chance of succeeding even if the claim forms had gone to the correct address

 

Even if the debt was yours,

is it possible that it was Statute Barred at the time that the claim was issued?

Had there been a clear period of at least six years since payments started to be missed?

  • Confused 1

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi sidewinder

 

THank you for your reply.

 

Noddle is quite vague with the information it provides.

 

THe credit report is mine but the CCJ only gives the date it was registed and a case number.

how would find out who registered the CCJ?

 

The amount which is owing is just over £1500

if I'm guessing I think it relates to a overdraft on a bank account which went into default sometime in 2012.

 

I can only remember receiving a few calls from lowells debt collection

and has I wouldnt ever confirm my details over the phone the conversation was always a non starter.

 

If I owe the money I will pay the debt.

 

Do I deal with the court for a payment arrangement?

 

Once this balance is cleared. Would my credit report reflected this?

 

Thank you again! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A little bit more information.

 

The CCJ amount is actually £1900.

 

On my noddle report I have a default for £1700 which lowells registered against a current account.

That also shows as default date 10/10/2011.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you could pop onto www.trustonline.org.uk

should give a few more details

 

 

 

 

however, even after that

you'll still need to phone the northants court on Monday

and ask for a copy of it.

 

 

just remember, its your responsibility to tell your creditors you have moved.

if you didn't, you won't , solely, be able to use that excuse to set the CCJ aside.

 

 

even if you pay this, it will still show and kill any credit application till its 6th birthday

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you would need to get a cert of satisfaction from the court [£15 I think]

but that wont make any odds to getting credit

 

 

a CCJ is a killer paid or not until it drops off on its 6th birthday.

 

 

I'd get all the info first.

 

 

then decide

 

 

as sidewinder indicated , if you can prove, the claimant 'knew' your new address

then a set aside could be possible

 

 

knowing lowells, it was prob carter that got the CCJ

and he pulls many tricks to ensure a default and uncontested judgement

whereby if the defendant knew about the case, it might well have failed

 

 

once you know the original creditor

then get an SAR off to them.

 

 

might find PPI/PENALTY charges to reclaim

to offset the money.

  • Haha 1

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

 

I recently signed up to noddle to check my credit report.

 

 

I noticed that I have a CCJ issued against me on the 15/05/2014.

 

 

A case number is provided but no company name shows.

I would also like to point out that this CCJ is registered with my previous address.

 

I would like assistance or to be guided in the right way to deal with this issue.

 

I didn't know that a CCJ was going to be issued.

I moved out of the address it's listed against on the 28/09/2013

so any paper work relating to this would have been sent there

and I had no knowledge that a case was to be heard.

 

I can provide proof by a tenancy agreement showing the date that I moved out of that address.

 

Is there anything that I can do to try and resolve this issue?

 

thank you in advance

 

Hi this should be quite easy for your to resolve but may take a little leg work from you.

 

On the your Noddle Credit Report there will be a Reference Number for the CCJ (make a note of that number)

 

Now go onto a website operated by 'Registry Trust Limited' (trustonline . org . uk) . This company basically receives all the fresh CCJ's from various courts and feeds the information through to all major credit reference agencies..Namely Experian, Equifax and Call Credit ( for your information Noddle.co.uk is owned by Call Credit)

 

Now navigate through trustonline.co.uk, enter your Full Name and address that the CCJ was issued to, it will cost you £4.00 (four pound).....you will get full details of which court issued the CCJ (probably Northampton).

 

Next phone the court named on the trustonline report (if Northampton the direct number is 0300 123 1056), be prepared to wait in a que, they will answer your call.

 

Now quote the CCJ number found on Noddle, the court is quite open and will tell you who issued applied for the CCJ against your name....you have a choice now to either complete a form number 'N244' and pay a fee to the court to have it registered as 'Set Aside' as you never received the CCJ as you were not living at the address where it was posted to.

 

Unfortunately the CCJ will be then re-issued to your current address but if you pay it quickly and on time it will have less of an impact on your Credit History as it will appear as settled.

 

Also and of couse you can dispute the CCJ directky with the company who applied for the CCJ originally.

 

I think i'm pretty correct with the above advise and hope you find it useful....I am indeed going through a similar process at the momnet but the CCJ is nothing to do with me.

 

Interstingly enough my CCJ appeared on Noddle but not on Equifax, it makes you wonder what all these companies are really up to....All these credit reference sites seem to differ with the information held.

 

Whilst they serve a purpose, they sure do make inocent peoples lives complete missery.

 

Good Luck and dont worry.

Link to post
Share on other sites

as noddle gives the CCJ number

no need for TOL.

 

 

its not quite correct the CCJ can be set aside

IF the defendant did not inform their creditors of an address change

it will be diff to get it set aside for that reason

plus a defence will be needed too

 

 

as for the CCJ being re-issued at the correct address

again not exactly how things happen

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sure

99/100 the default unknown ccj's are always issued by northants.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...