Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Holiday gift now claimed to be owed


silky666
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3455 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Summary: ex girlfriend books a holiday and invites me along saying she will pay. (She came into £300,000 recently).

4 weeks after the holiday she decides to end the relationship and is now sending me emails asking me to pay back £700.

Can she take me to court ? Should I reply to the emails. ?

 

Apologies if this is the wrong section. I am new to the forum and very worried so posting out of desperation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm assuming that the idea of the holiday being a loan was never mentioned. I'm also assuming that she offered it to you and that you didn't ask her or you didn't suggest that you come along with her.

 

In that case, I really don't think that you have much to worry about. Don't ignore her messages. Send her one message laying out your position that she offered the holiday to you as an act of friendship and as an act of kindness and you accepted it on that basis. Explain that at no time was it ever suggested or contemplated that the holiday amount to a loan to you and that there were any conditions or that they would ever need to be a repayment.

 

Tell her that you do not owe her anything and you won't be entering into any further communication with her. Tell her that if she wants to make an issue of it then she should start a small claim in the County Court and you will be happy to put your case to the judge.

 

Tell her that if she does not do this, then that if she continues to send you further emails about this then you will take it as sign of harassment and consider your position accordingly.

 

Send that email of. Make sure that you keep copies. Make sure you keep copies of any other messages that she sends to you. Make sure that you do not contact her on the telephone and make sure that if she contact you on the telephone that you keep it as short as possible – but keep it polite – and record the calls.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Summary: ex girlfriend books a holiday and invites me along saying she will pay. (She came into £300,000 recently).

4 weeks after the holiday she decides to end the relationship and is now sending me emails asking me to pay back £700.

Can she take me to court ? Should I reply to the emails. ?

 

Apologies if this is the wrong section. I am new to the forum and very worried so posting out of desperation.

 

Reply to the emails. Keep them factual & non-emotive.

 

State that your understanding was that the holiday was a gift (accepted in the knowledge of her recent inheritance), and that you never agreed to contribute towards it.

 

Can she take you to court?. Yes, in so far as "anyone can take anyone to court", so yes, she might try.

There is a world of difference between trying & succeeding, though.

If it came to it it would be for a judge to weigh the evidence / statements of both parties.

 

Edited to add; another poster has answered, on similar lines. Sorry for any duplication : we were typing at the same time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice and wording. Extremely useful. . Much appreciated.

But next 'curve ball' question:

If she does decided to take me to small claims court ... can I counter claim the following:

1) I did some work for her designing her company logo ... I also helped her out with some work on site ... I also bought her a very expensive watch for her running.

Can I counter claim that I want those gifts back in the same court hearing.

How would I roughly go about this ? (May need wording and procedure advice later)

 

Note: I don't want to get this petty.. but I am not willing to just walk into court and let her claim back a gift without a fight .

Of course I hope she just drops her vendetta and leaves me alone :)

Many thanks in advance for any help... It really is appreciated.

Respect. Silky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice and wording. Extremely useful. . Much appreciated.

But next 'curve ball' question:

If she does decided to take me to small claims court ... can I counter claim the following:

1) I did some work for her designing her company logo ... I also helped her out with some work on site ... I also bought her a very expensive watch for her running.

Can I counter claim that I want those gifts back in the same court hearing.

How would I roughly go about this ? (May need wording and procedure advice later)

 

Note: I don't want to get this petty.. but I am not willing to just walk into court and let her claim back a gift without a fight .

Of course I hope she just drops her vendetta and leaves me alone :)

Many thanks in advance for any help... It really is appreciated.

Respect. Silky

 

What was the agreement regarding the logo, work, & watch?

 

I note that you describe them as "gifts". That on its own is likely fatal to any claim by you : if they were gifts how can you claim for them?

(In the same way as she can't claim the holiday cost if she gifted it to you)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Test the ground by sending this text/email:

'As you want me to pay for the holiday that you invited me to and referred to as a treat to me, Can you please return my watch that I lent you?'

She can't prove that the watch was a gift and you can't prove that the holiday was a gift.

Even and sealed in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Test the ground by sending this text/email:

'As you want me to pay for the holiday that you invited me to and referred to as a treat to me, Can you please return my watch that I lent you?'

She can't prove that the watch was a gift and you can't prove that the holiday was a gift.

Even and sealed in writing.

 

I disagree.

 

She doesn't have to prove anything -

1) a court would make a decision on balance of evidence, not conclusive proof

2) on a moral rather than legal ground, why behave badly just because she has,

3) on a legal rather than moral ground, if she has seen this thread, and recognised herself, the OP admitting the watch was a gift would be highly persuasive ......

Link to post
Share on other sites

I disagree.

 

 

 

She doesn't have to prove anything -

 

1) a court would make a decision on balance of evidence, not conclusive proof

 

2) on a moral rather than legal ground, why behave badly just because she has,

 

3) on a legal rather than moral ground, if she has seen this thread, and recognised herself, the OP admitting the watch was a gift would be highly persuasive ......

And what evidence has she got that the holiday cost had to be split?

A good judge (mind the word good and read on) would see such claim as petty and vindictive imo.

On a moral ground, the op is facing threats of court action based on a lie, I don't see anything wrong with testing the ground and see if she backs off.

Accordingly to the op she started behaving badly and asking for money.

The op could even claim that the logo he designed has been unpaid despite a verbal agreement, not uncommon between partners.

I would try to avoid court at all costs, given how good some women are at crying and acting in front of strangers (the judge) who could be fooled into thinking she's a victim rather than a greedy and vindictive person.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And what evidence has she got that the holiday cost had to be split?

.

 

She hasn't, and given the combination of

a) his claim it was a gift, and

b) her inheritance, where such a gift is entirely likely,

 

The OP's statements are entirely believable.

Why risk that by then making claims she CAN PROVE are lies?

 

A good judge (mind the word good and read on) would see such claim as petty and vindictive imo.

On a moral ground, the op is facing threats of court action based on a lie, I don't see anything wrong with testing the ground and see if she backs off.

Accordingly to the op she started behaving badly and asking for money.

The op could even claim that the logo he designed has been unpaid despite a verbal agreement, not uncommon between partners.

I would try to avoid court at all costs, given how good some women are at crying and acting in front of strangers (the judge) who could be fooled into thinking she's a victim rather than a greedy and vindictive person.

 

I agree with avoiding court where possible.

However, doing so by (provably!) bad behaviour is risky, if it then does go to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand how asking to be paid for designing a logo or returning a watch amounts to bad behaviour when the ex is asking for money unfairly.

She can't have it both ways: They either return all the gifts to each other and pay for services provided or she leaves everything as it is and goes away.

She's claiming the holiday was not a gift and so the op could make the same claim about the logo or anything else.

No proof whatsoever from either part.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand how asking to be paid for designing a logo or returning a watch amounts to bad behaviour when the ex is asking for money unfairly.

She can't have it both ways: They either return all the gifts to each other and pay for services provided or she leaves everything as it is and goes away.

She's claiming the holiday was not a gift and so the op could make the same claim about the logo or anything else.

No proof whatsoever from either part.

 

If the ex-gf recognises her situation from here & has saved evidence where the OP admits the logo & watch were gifts ;

1) it is bad behaviour to claim something wasn't a gift when it was given as a gift

2) her doing so means she has behaved badly, and that doesn't mean he should do so too,

3) her being able to show he has lied about the "gifts he gave not being gifts" would enable her to challenge his credibility in her case where she claims the holiday wasn't a gift from her, and he claims it was a gift from her.

 

It isn't about who has behaved badly, it is about who would be more believable in court. I suggest that is the key determinant on if she'd go to court.

 

At the moment if it went to court he'd likely win.

Your advice risks the possibility of reversing that......

 

You say "no proof" : but his postings on here might form evidence if he followed your advice to say "watch & logo weren't gifts" when he has stated here that they were....

 

How likely is it that there is someone else:

1) whose gf came into £300k-odd

2) who took their bf on holiday

3) which couple split, with a later disagreement over payment for the holiday,

4) where the bf had gifted the gf a watch, and designed a logo, as a gift .....

 

If she has seen this thread, she'll be rubbing her hands with glee if he follows your advice......

He'll go from a credible witness to a provable liar

She'll have the text message from him, and the posting from here, and it will be obvious the posting here describes their (rather than anyone else's situation)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the ex-gf recognises her situation from here & has saved evidence where the OP admits the logo & watch were gifts ;

 

1) it is bad behaviour to claim something wasn't a gift when it was given as a gift

 

2) her doing so means she has behaved badly, and that doesn't mean he should do so too,

 

3) her being able to show he has lied about the "gifts he gave not being gifts" would enable her to challenge his credibility in her case where she claims the holiday wasn't a gift from her, and he claims it was a gift from her.

 

 

 

It isn't about who has behaved badly, it is about who would be more believable in court. I suggest that is the key determinant on if she'd go to court.

 

 

 

At the moment if it went to court he'd likely win.

 

Your advice risks the possibility of reversing that......

 

 

 

You say "no proof" : but his postings on here might form evidence if he followed your advice to say "watch & logo weren't gifts" when he has stated here that they were....

 

 

 

How likely is it that there is someone else:

 

1) whose gf came into £300k-odd

 

2) who took their bf on holiday

 

3) which couple split, with a later disagreement over payment for the holiday,

 

4) where the bf had gifted the gf a watch, and designed a logo, as a gift .....

 

 

 

If she has seen this thread, she'll be rubbing her hands with glee if he follows your advice......

 

He'll go from a credible witness to a provable liar

 

She'll have the text message from him, and the posting from here, and it will be obvious the posting here describes their (rather than anyone else's situation)

Fair enough, even if I think you're overestimating the cag popularity.

I still think that if he went to court he would risk finding a soft judge who would believe a crying ex girlfriend mistreated and not appreciated for the length of the relationship and also used as a cash machine when money flooded her pockets.

He could be seen as the monster boyfriend lazing in the sofa all day drunk as a fish.

Sorry to disagree, but I would take the risk of asking to take this post down and send her the message so to avoid court at all costs.

I was in a similar situation once and someone was asking for money for a car they'd given me and I repaired at my own large costs.

They even went to the extent of falsifying a sale receipt claiming that money was due in instalments.

Some people need a noisy wake up call to stop bothering others.

I know this might prove very unpopular with some caggers, but sometimes harsh measures are needed to combat vicious people in my experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In any case, as we are all morally orientated here, why don't we suggest to the op to give her the money she claims so to morally smack her in the face?

That would surely shut her up and make the op look like a person of higher lever than her.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In any case, as we are all morally orientated here, why don't we suggest to the op to give her the money she claims so to morally smack her in the face?

That would surely shut her up and make the op look like a person of higher lever than her.

 

Since it is equally morally wrong to give in to her bad behaviour......

 

My viewpoint is influenced by the morality, but equally also the practicality of the situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fair enough, even if I think you're overestimating the cag popularity.

I still think that if he went to court he would risk finding a soft judge who would believe a crying ex girlfriend mistreated and not appreciated for the length of the relationship and also used as a cash machine when money flooded her pockets.

He could be seen as the monster boyfriend lazing in the sofa all day drunk as a fish.

Sorry to disagree, but I would take the risk of asking to take this post down and send her the message so to avoid court at all costs.

I was in a similar situation once and someone was asking for money for a car they'd given me and I repaired at my own large costs.

They even went to the extent of falsifying a sale receipt claiming that money was due in instalments.

Some people need a noisy wake up call to stop bothering others.

I know this might prove very unpopular with some caggers, but sometimes harsh measures are needed to combat vicious people in my experience.

 

"He who comes to equity must come with clean hands"

You are suggesting he dirties his hands.

Fair enough as it became (in Tinsley v Milligan) "he who comes to equity must come with clean hands - unless your hands are dirty but can be stuffed in a pocket so the dirt isn't visible"

 

You are suggesting the OP "dirties his hands" and then hides those dirty hands by deleting the post here.

That risks the ex-gf not already having seen the post

It risks the ex-gf not having a copy of an email or text where the logo or watch were described as a gift.

 

It means the OP dirtying their hands, which they might not be able to hide.......

We can't stop the ex-gf lying : and it MIGHT benefit her.

However, the truth has the benefit of only having to remember the one version, and you can't get caught out in a lie over it. This is why I suggest the OP consider carefully before going down that route.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I simply suggested what I would do to avoid court:

1. Use same weapon of the enemy and take a risk

2. Pay up and delete the gf from memory

 

There's also the option of letting her do whatever she wants and end up in court hoping for a judge who can see past the crying and moaning of a vindictive ex gf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I simply suggested what I would do to avoid court:

1. Use same weapon of the enemy and take a risk

2. Pay up and delete the gf from memory

 

There's also the option of letting her do whatever she wants and end up in court hoping for a judge who can see past the crying and moaning of a vindictive ex gf

 

Other (better?) option to avoid court: reply "take me to court, you'll loose".....

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...