Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bank changed loan agreement - consolidation loan lloyds debts


Farrah
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3481 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I'm in quite a bit of financial trouble at the moment and I was hoping someone on here could give me some advice.

 

about 3 years ago I was struggling to keep up with my credit payments.

I had a loan, credit card and overdraft, all with Lloyd's.

 

 

I spoke to them and they offered me a refinancing loan to bring the 3 outstanding debts into 1.

The loan was for £25k.

 

 

Unfortunately shortly after I agreed to the new loan I became ill and was unable to work,

I missed a few payments and Lloyd's issued a default.

I did some digging and I found out that there was PPI on the first loan that I had taken out 7 years ago.

I asked for a refund of this but Lloyd's said there was no PPI.

 

 

I went to the financial ombudsman and then Lloyd's wrote to me and said there was £5000 of PPI, which they paid me back.

they refused to pay any interest on the PPI.

 

 

Their argument was that the refund they were paying was a balance adjustment on the refinancing loan, not a PPI refund,

because had PPI not been added to the first loan then the refinancing loan would only have been for £20k and not £25k,

they were changing the terms of the refinancing loan to make it for £20k instead of £25k.

I never agreed to this but they did it anyway.

 

 

My question is

 

 

an they do this?

I signed an agreement with them for a £25k loan.

 

 

Surely that is a binding contract between both parties.

Surely they can't just come back at a later date and say 'sorry, the original loan amount was wrong,we're changing it'

especially after I had defaulted.

 

 

Had the loan been for £20k originally then the repayments would have been £100 a month less and I might not have defaulted.

 

 

Stupidly I got myself into further debt by trying to cover the repayments,

my total debt now stands at £32k, all with DCAs.

 

 

I've gone from a clean credit file with 3 accounts,

to a totally trashed file with 9 defaults and debt collectors ringing me 20 times a day.

I can't afford to pay these debts and I'm really struggling.

 

 

I could cover the other debts on a repayment plan but not the £20k Lloyd's debt as well, which is now with Lowell's.

 

 

I know it's a long shot, but since Lloyd's admitted the loan was wrong in the first place

and then changed the terms at a later date without me agreeing to it,

 

 

is the agreement still valid?

Can I challenge it and have the debt written off?

 

Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Sorry for the long post.

 

As a side note,

I am moving house soon.

Should I just move and not tell the DCAs?

All of the defaults are at least two years old, they'll be statute barred in 4 years and

if the DCAs can't find me they can't hassle me.

 

 

I realise lowells will probably try for a CCJ for the £20k,

but at least the other £12k will be written off.

 

 

All of the debt is unsecured, and

I don't own a house or car or anything of value.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds were sadly correct in restructuring the loan after PPI was reclaimed

if that is what happened?

 

 

I thinkyou need to send them an sar

get all the statements for everything that was refinanced into the loan.

 

 

I get there was more than one PPI rolled into the loan?

 

 

as for you other debts...

 

 

I hope you've sent every one of the DCA's a CCA request?

 

 

lastly, I would sadly be writing to all your creditors informing them of the change of address

 

 

as they could gt a CCJ served to your old address and win by default if you don't know about it.

 

 

though the CCA request could serve this purpose if you wait until after your move to send them.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's the annoying thing. Lloyd's aren't calling it a PPI refund.

If it was then by law they also have to pay 8% per annum interest,

which would come to over £1000 they owe me.

 

 

But because it's a balance readjustment they claim they don't owe me any interest on it.

Which just seems wrong on so many levels.

 

 

Not only have they trashed my credit rating and caused me untold amounts of stress and worry,

they're also trying to get out of paying me what they owe me.

 

As for the DCAs, sent all the 'prove it' letters but just got the standard 'it's not necessary' replies.

That's why I wanted to just move and ignore them.

 

 

I hate the idea of paying these pond life a single penny.

I would happily file for bankruptcy if it wasn't for the fact that one of my other debts is a guarantor loan,

so they'd go after my father for the money if I went bankrupt,

and I can't put that on him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

that's why I said SAR Lloyds

 

 

let s get to the bottom of what happened and put in a proper claim.

 

 

the FOS/FCA recently stated lots of refunds were dealt with poorly

and LLOyds were one of them listed.

 

 

as for the prove it letter

 

 

theres no reason why that does not apply.

 

 

you should be send a CCA request to everyone.

 

 

as long as the debt is not a bank account or a mobile phone debt

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for getting back to me so quickly Dx, I really appreciate it.

 

 

I'll send an SAR to Lloyd's tomorrow.

 

 

when the FOS was investigating the case Lloyd's provided a full breakdown of the refinancing loan.

I can't remember the exact figures but it was roughly £21k loan, £2000 overdraft and £2000 credit card.

 

 

The original loan was £15k, but it was a professional studies loan to pay for university

there was a 4 year no repayment period while I was at university,

 

 

when I started repaying it the interest that had accrued over those 4 years made it over £20k.

It was only later that I realised that a £3000 PPI loan was added onto that original £15000,

and the interest on that PPI loan took it to over £5000 by the time it was refinanced.

 

As for the CCA requests,

I can't be certain but I think I might have sent them already.

I used templates that I found on here but I just got standard replies.

 

 

Lowell sent me a letter with a badly photocopied Lloyd logo at the top,

in the same envelope as a letter from lowells,

both saying that the debt had been assigned to Lowells.

 

 

The two letters both had the same printer code running along the side,

so they were obviously both printed by Lowells.

 

 

I rang Lloyd's and they said the debt had been sold on but they couldn't tell me who they'd sold it to.

But just to be on the safe side I'll send new CCA requests tomorrow.

Link to post
Share on other sites

None of the debts are for a mobile phone, and only one is related to a bank account, which is £350 for a Lloyd's overdraft. The rest are personal unsecured loans, credit cards and payday loans.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCA time then!!

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...