Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just out of curiosity aesmith - are you a lawyer?
    • I spoke to a pro-bono entity this afternoon.  They advise I must initiate a claim in the court v the receiver if I want to then file an application for an order for sale.  I must have a claim/ proceedings to be able to force a sale. The judge in the current proceedings  has told me that I cannot force the lender to sell and the lender cannot interfere either.   If the receiver isn't acting correctly and isn't selling - this means I must make a claim against the receiver I could initiate a claim. Or much quicker  - the other entity - with a charge already - could use that to make an application for an order for sale.
    • Thanks Dave It's not too far away, about 8 or 9 miles, so I will probably venture over on my bike if I can't think of a good reason to drive there again! I'll have a chat with Mrs GB_Joe tomorrow and see which shops they visited, I know M&S was on the list (had to try on multiple sets of trousers!) and they are actually in that bit of retail park. The uniform shop is across the way in the Meridian Centre, so probably not helpful to get them involved.
    • As they have failed to deliver their original PCN you will need to send them an SAR where they should provide that PCN. It should show the address they used . If it is not your current one that would explain the non delivery. If it was correct then perhaps the Post office messed up. A more cynical view would be that UKPC didn't send it so that you couldn't claim the reduction. It appears that UKPC have been there for some time  but I have been unable to find any pictures of their Notices.The leisure park itself is pretty big so while some parts maybe give 5 hours free parking other parts may have restrictions like permits. I haven't been there for years -I went  to Nandos and the bowling centre . I am surprised that they are now infested with UKPC as the place is plenty big enough not to require their dubious services. If you live not to far away it would help if you could get some legible pictures of their signs. Be carful to park in an area that doesn't require a permit and take photos of the entrance signs, the five hour sign and the permit only sign as well as any other signs that are different from the previous signs. Also if their is a payment machine could you please photograph that.
    • This other entity doesn't know what's going on.  To be clear I had huge equity.  No-one would ever expect a lender to erode all my equity.  The question is - if anyone knows the legal answer - on the basis they have a charging order - could they make an application for an order for sale?  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

car insurance, no claim discount swapping with spouse


harrymarry
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3479 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all,

 

i am new to this forum.

i have a problem with my car insurance.

am i in the correct forum 2 ask u a question on car insurance.

 

if i am NOT, please direct me to the right one.

 

if i am, here is my question.

 

my current insurance has asked me to provide a proof of my no claim bonus, ++other things.

in my current insurance policy start date 1/10/14, i have put down my wifes name as a policy holder.

from the registration certificate of the car she has always been the holder.

 

in my previous car insurance, i put down my name as a policy holder.

I have always been the second driver and my wife has always been the main driver.

 

my question is, does number of no claim bonus be inter changeable between the spouse ?

Edited by honeybee13
Names removed.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes couples do this all the time. If the policy is registered as Insured and spouse, then Insurers can swap you around. When the NCD proof is issued it will be in the same of the person was noted as Policyholder at the time.

 

You need to speak to your Insurers about this.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes couples do this all the time. If the policy is registered as Insured and spouse, then Insurers can swap you around. When the NCD proof is issued it will be in the same of the person was noted as Policyholder at the time.

 

 

 

You need to speak to your Insurers about this.

Better to clarify on this.

If the insured is Mr A and the additional driver Mr B,

Mr A will earn the NCD.

Mr B will not.

However, some insurance companies allow the named driver Mr B to earn their own NCD, but only if they renew with the same company.

If Mr A decides to change insurance company having earned 5 years NCD with Mr B as an additional driver, he would be making a mistake declaring Mr B as having 5 years NCD.

This could lead to dear consequences in case of a serious accident where the insurance company will try all their best to invalidate the policy.

Better check with the insurance company in writing before making any assumption

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband and I go turn and turn about. One year he's the policy holder and I'm a named driver and the next year we swap. Most companies accept NCD from within the previous two years so this keeps both our NCD current.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My husband and I go turn and turn about. One year he's the policy holder and I'm a named driver and the next year we swap. Most companies accept NCD from within the previous two years so this keeps both our NCD current.

Ever checked with the insurance if this is ok?

If you stay with the same insurance they'll probably allow this, but if you change every year like me, in my experience this 'trick' is not allowed.

I know a lot of people do it anyway, but I always wonder what the insurance company would say in the event of a very serious accident where they're about to fork out hundred of thousands.

When my friend had an head on collision on a b road and the other driver put a claim for £500k, the insurance confiscated both vehicles to investigate further and even sent the front light bulbs for forensic analysis to make sure they were on at the time of collision.

They seriously tried every trick in the book to invalidate the policy.

They also contacted the employer to make sure his job title had been disclosed correctly.

Be careful out there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ever checked with the insurance if this is ok?

If you stay with the same insurance they'll probably allow this, but if you change every year like me, in my experience this 'trick' is not allowed.

I know a lot of people do it anyway, but I always wonder what the insurance company would say in the event of a very serious accident where they're about to fork out hundred of thousands.

When my friend had an head on collision on a b road and the other driver put a claim for £500k, the insurance confiscated both vehicles to investigate further and even sent the front light bulbs for forensic analysis to make sure they were on at the time of collision.

They seriously tried every trick in the book to invalidate the policy.

They also contacted the employer to make sure his job title had been disclosed correctly.

Be careful out there!

 

If Insurance has been registered as Insured and spouse, it happens quite a lot and people do change Insurance at renewal. They are just getting the one NCD in the situation the OP has explained.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Ever checked with the insurance if this is ok?

Well yes in that we have to give details on renewal/change and there's nothing hidden. I've never known an insurer unhappy with it. We both hold maximum NCD and have done for many years. This just maintains it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well yes in that we have to give details on renewal/change and there's nothing hidden. I've never known an insurer unhappy with it. We both hold maximum NCD and have done for many years. This just maintains it.

I understand that you tell them who's the policy holder and their NCD, but did you tell them they were the named driver the year before?

I tried to do the same thing with my wife when we were buying a second car and the answer from many insurers was that named drivers don't earn NCD, only the policy holder.

We ended up buying the insurance with the existing company which accepted 2 years NCD based on the time we had been with them.

I know that many people do all sorts of things to pay a cheaper price, from tweaking their occupation to giving the parents address, the problem only comes when and if there's a serious claim put through and the insurance investigates thoroughly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I understand that you tell them who's the policy holder and their NCD, but

did you tell them they were the named driver the year before?

Of course we tell them. There's no getting away from it because they require proof of NCD.

 

 

I tried to do the same thing with my wife when we were buying a second car

and the answer from many insurers was that named drivers don't earn NCD, only

the policy holder.

I wonder if we're looking at two different things here. Neither of us are looking to earn NCD in our alternate years as named driver, we are only looking to maintain a long held status which was held individually when we each had a car. We're retired and now share a single car.

 

If you did the same thing when one of you didn't have full NCD entitlement then that driver would build up their NCD every other year when they were the policy holder but of course the premium would reflect their status.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Of course we tell them. There's no getting away from it because they require proof of NCD.

 

 

I wonder if we're looking at two different things here. Neither of us are looking to earn NCD in our alternate years as named driver, we are only looking to maintain a long held status which was held individually when we each had a car. We're retired and now share a single car.

 

If you did the same thing when one of you didn't have full NCD entitlement then that driver would build up their NCD every other year when they were the policy holder but of course the premium would reflect their status.

 

Yes that is the situation, when it is helpful. A couple with 2 cars each with NCD. They then sell one car and share the remaining. To keep the NCD for both parties alive the swap the policyholder around, so the NCD proof in one name does not go beyond the 2 years that most Insurers are willing to accept.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is one thing we do have to be very careful about. Only the policy holder has third party cover on other cars and we have to keep that in mind as we were used to both having that cover and being able to drive other cars without much thought. What we've tended to do is ensure we are also named drivers on other family members' cars so we're all covered every which way round.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...