Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Yes I understand that, my point is why is the account still be reported on 6 years after the default date has passed regardless of the SB date.   The default expired 4th November, Cabot put a query on the account the 7th November so it is still showing in my history, my question is why are they doing it?        
    • You will have to go to court to get an order  and once that is doen then you both have to abide by it. The actual form filling is not complicated and the first court session doesnt actually make any decisions and you will be advised to reach an agreement that can then be set in stone by the court.   the father has a right to "contact", but this is not the same as having the right to demand a particular set of visits, stopovers etc so decide what you want, and how this is practical and then ask that the contact be limited to this. for example if you work your contact will all be gettinmg them up, feeding them, putting them to bed and have no fun time at weekends if has has them then. The courts will do what is in the best interests ogf the child so you need to stop being jealous of their love for their father and dont try and use the system to punish him or the children. If he was abusive or controlling them read up on the serious crimes  act  2015 about controlling and coercive behaviour and see how amny fo the examples fit his behaviour and use that to get the courts to set lterms that  limit that behaviour instead of using the children as the tools.
    • Does anyone know if a person has the right  to use a lay representative in the family division of the county court? the wording of the Lay representatives(right of audience) order 1999 refers to a county court and stage 1 or tier 1 proceedings and Scots law have a form to fill out for such representation but it isnt clear whether the english system has such a clearly defined right of audience. The MoJ mentions it in some discussion papers as though it is hard and fast but in other documents  it is McKenzie Friends who are written about as if they are the only people allowed other than sols/barristers.   reason why lay rep needed is they can speak and the other side cant object where with McKenzie friend they cant speak on behalf of claimant/respondent and the other party can object to that person being present- which will happen  in this particular case. Ultimately it may well be a discretionary power of the judge but dont want to start off with a bad step.
    • It seems as though the solicitoras want to keep hold of this payday and will do anything to churn it ( make money by continuing an action that isnt in the clients interests).   The land registry will have the record of who paid for the property and how so you will be in the clear on that as you didnt just take the place over, you bought it from the estate of the deceased.   now it seems like your mother is struck by regrets/remorse over her inability to take over the property at the time and what tends to happen is that relatives will sit there and say bad things about the person who they see is the beneficiary of their misfortune and then get into a feedback loop, each reinforcing the wrong opinion of the other.   Your attempts to sort things out logically ahs tempered this somewhat so do continue and keep clear of their  lawyers at all costs, they will just keep the meter ticking over and bring the negative thought back to the surface.   your parents will already be about 2 grand a day down on anything the sols have done so try and get them to  look back to the mess that her father's death left them in and amke it clear that at least the house is still in the family and that she has benefitted from that by receiving money at the time that otherwise she wouldnt have got.   If that still causes friction then I would still write to them rather than responding to the solicitor, the lesson they will learn will cost them less and when the sols have moved on to the next client they will have not lost so much of what they still have left.   Ultimately if they do actually issue proceedings you can ask for the claim to be chucked out as having no merit etc by showing how the place was bought. I do struggle to believe that people dont know who their mortgage was with even after all of this time,  same as I find it odd that people suddenly find details for accounts with tens of thousands in that they had forgotten about. You can find out as again it will be in the Land registry entry for most properties that had a mortgage
    • A claim was issued against you on 30/07/2019 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 31/07/2019 at 18:14:49 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 01/08/2019 at 08:05:52 Your defence was submitted on 30/08/2019 at 23:17:46 Your defence was received on 02/09/2019 at 01:06:05 DQ sent to you on 27/09/2019 DQ filed by claimant on 27/09/2019 You filed a DQ on 23/10/2019 Your claim was transferred to BIRMINGHAM on 14/11/2019
  • Our picks

reallymadwoman

Poor training or idiocy? ** Resolved **

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 309 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I have just been told by Customer Services at Currys that they cannot discuss my claim with me, only my solicitor.

 

 

Further, even though they admit that they have breached our contract and been negligent,

they don't have to pay me anything in compensation.

 

 

Apparently you only get damages in court if you're injured.

 

 

After I informed them that I was recording the call,

I have the poor girl saying that of course if she's wrong Currys will pay all my costs, including the solicitor.

 

So for the sake of a claim for a few hundred pounds,

Currys are willing to risk at least that much in costs?

 

 

As the title says, their customer service staff either need some urgent training or Currys are idiots.

 

It is so tempting to take them at their word ....


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say both. You are the 'claimant' therefore they are allowed to speak with you. What would they do if the customer didn't have a solicitor? Refuse to discuss the issue.

 

Muppets!


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What would they do if the customer didn't have a solicitor? Refuse to discuss the issue.

 

Muppets!

 

This is exactly what they are doing! They won't discuss the claim with me, on the phone or in writing, so either I take them at their word and instruct a solicitor or I issue proceedings and see if they'll talk to me then!


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

whats the issue?

failed delivery?

data loss?

someone punching you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems Currys aren't going to respond and I may have to actually issue proceedings. Claim is for loss of earnings/plumbers costs due to 3 failed deliveries (confirmed via text and email, then didn't turn up) topped off by delivery of a washing machine that had been dropped from such a height that all the transport bolts had sheered. Took nearly an hour on the phone after that one to convince them that they were responsible for replacing it, not the manufacturer. They originally offered me £100 which I was willing to take just to get it over with, but then they didn't pay so I withdrew my acceptance and sent them a detailed claim for just over £300.

 

CAB say I can claim for loss of earnings, particularly since they messed up so many times, Currys maintain I can't and now they're ignoring me. It just seems such a waste of everyone's time and money to have to issue - I have much better things to do with my time. Oh well, MCOL here we come. Rant over.


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Proceedings issued. I've opted to send a detailed particulars of claim separately, anyone know if it has to be in any particular format and does it have to be signed?


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not to worry, found it myself. No particular format, just needs a 'statement of truth' at the end.


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

And they've finally responded!

They're defending all the claim, but at least they've responded.


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ooer this comes as a little bit late but I would of advised you to send a LETTER BEFORE ACTION to the CEOS office giving them 14 days to respond.....

No more phone conversations with curries, do everything in writing and keep proof of postage


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Did everything in writing, letter, letter before action, final warning, got me nowhere. Their legal department will only speak to solicitors (phone or in writing) and customer services can't do anything. I have done everything possible to avoid taking this to court. I don't want to go anywhere near a court if there is any way I can avoid it. It's a shame Currys don't feel the same.


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone direct me to relevant case law regarding claiming 'consequential losses' (loss of earnings/annual leave etc) following breach of contract or negligence?

CAB say I can claim loss of earnings due to repeated delivery failures, Currys (quite naturally) say I can't.


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I need to pay the hearing fee for this claim by Saturday but have been totally unable to find out how - nothing on the papers from the court, can't get through on the phone and it's a £60 return taxi fare to go in person. Any suggestions? If I post a cheque, will they accept it as having been paid in time?


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For anyone reading the previous post, I sent a cheque and it was accepted.

 

The hearing is now just over a week away. I believe I need to submit my schedule of costs at least 24 hours before the hearing to all parties. Anyone know what it's supposed to look like?


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A brief history of the issue:-

 

Booked delivery and installation of a washing machine on 10th June. Delivery confirmed but no one turned up and no one phoned to cancel.

Rebooked for 12th. Turned up but refused to install as it would be ‘dangerous’.

Arranged plumber to install the following morning. He discovered the machine had been dropped sufficiently hard to sheer all the transport bolts.

Delivery of replacement booked for following day, and confirmed but again no one turned up and no phone call to cancel. Contract eventually completed on 17th.

Currys initially offered a £15 voucher in compensation then agreed to pay the plumber’s charge, rounded up to £100 as a gesture of goodwill. Refused categorically to even consider any claim for loss of earnings or any other losses, and maintained that they could effectively have as many goes as they like at completing a contract without consequence as loss of earnings was not reasonably foreseeable.

 

Detailed letter of claim to their legal department went unanswered as did the letter before action. A ‘final reminder’ prompted a phone call some two weeks later, and the day after proceedings had been issued. A redacted copy of the detailed particulars of claim is attached.

 

Currys acknowledged the claim in plenty of time and submitted a defence basically denying everything - i.e. denying that they’d failed to turn up, denying refusing to install for a made up reason, denying the first machine delivered was damaged, denying they failed to turn up again, denying that I suffered any loss and if I did, denying that it was recoverable and even if it was, that I had failed to mitigate my loss by not arranging deliveries only on days I didn’t work.

 

Mediation followed, during which Currys effectively reduced their original offer and refused to budge despite me being willing to settle for half of what I claimed as I was already sick to death of the whole thing.

 

Shortly after mediation they then alleged that the installation charge had already been refunded and retracted any other offer on the basis that they had already compensated me adequately. The implication was that I’d received this refund and effectively claimed it again. Needless to say, I was furious since I hadn’t had a refund, which they eventually acknowledged.

 

Further correspondence achieved nothing so I resigned myself to turning up for the hearing. Currys had refused to concede anything and were insisting that my two witnesses would also have to attend the hearing. Since they both wanted their loss of earnings and travel costs up front, I decided to take a chance and not ask them to attend. This did mean that technically their witness statements could not be relied on at the hearing, but I’m sure the judge had read them anyway, he’d obviously read everything else. I also knew from Curry’s bundle that they were effectively submitting no evidence, not even a statement from the first incompetent fitter.

 

On the day before the hearing I went through my bundle again and prepared a 5-10 minute statement of what I was claiming and why, and also made notes of page numbers from the Curry’s bundle of things I might need to mention. I also gave very serious consideration to what was the minimum I would accept if an offer was made ‘on the steps of the court’.

 

On the day of the hearing, I arrived in plenty of time, signed in with the usher and introduced myself to Curry’s representative, the same person with whom I had been in correspondence. I gave him an opening to continue negotiations, he didn’t take it. Even at that point, I’d have settled for half the claim plus the issue fee and hearing fee.

 

My opening statement turned out to be unnecessary as the judge did it for me. I was asked if I wanted to ask any questions (I didn’t) and then it was Curry’s turn. He asked various questions which I of course answered honestly and to the best of my recollection (useful phrase that, if you’re not absolutely sure of something). The judge then asked some questions of his own, there was a bit of legal jargon tennis which went completely over my head, the upshot of which was the judge ridiculing the idea that anyone in their right mind would consider loss of earnings in these circumstances to be unreasonable.

 

The judge then gave his judgement by first summarising the claim then the various arguments for and against and then his decision. He held that each failed delivery was a breach of contract and so was delivery of a damaged machine and I was basically awarded everything I claimed plus the court fees and my taxi fares to and from the court. Mr Currys did suggest that the issue fee would have been lower had I not claimed the one item that wasn’t awarded, the judge just shook his head in a ‘don’t try my patience any further’ sort of way. After that, I doubt he’d have dared query the taxi fares particularly as I have an obvious disability, but in other circumstances the cost of public transport only might have been awarded instead.

  • Confused 1

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 Claim number XXXXXXX XXXX v DSG Retail

 

Detailed Particulars of Claim

 

 

On 8th June 2014 the claimant ordered a washing machine from the defendant for the sum of £XXX plus £XX for installation. Delivery of the new product and disconnection and removal of the old machine were included within the price. The defendant arranged to deliver the product on Tuesday 10th June, and confirmed this arrangement via email and text message, giving a four hour time slot in which delivery would take place. The claimant informed her tenants of the date and time of the delivery.

On 10th June, the claimant’s tenants arranged to be at home to accept delivery of the new product. The defendant failed to deliver the washing machine and failed to contact either the claimant or the tenants to advise them that delivery would not be taking place.

Delivery was rearranged for 12th June, again within a four hour time slot. The claimant’s tenants were unable to be present on this occasion, so the claimant had to attend at their premises to accept delivery.

The defendant’s agents delivered the new washing machine at around 11 am. These agents refused to disconnect and remove the old appliance or install the new one as they alleged that it would be dangerous to do so. The claimant was thus left with the old appliance still in situ and a new washing machine taking up most of the space in the small hallway. The claimant’s tenants were still without the use of a washing machine and now had the additional inconvenience of a large package partially blocking the only means of access to or exit from the property.

On 12th June 2014 the defendant was put on notice that time was of the essence and substantial costs were being incurred as a result of the delay.

As the defendant’s agents had refused to remove the old appliance or install the new one, the claimant arranged for a plumber to attend on 13th June to do so. The claimant’s tenants arranged to be at home to grant access to the plumber. The plumber successfully disconnected the old appliance and exchanged it for the machine in the hallway. He then unpacked the new appliance and began installation by removing the transport bolts. These are substantial bolts which are intended to prevent the drum from moving whilst the appliance is being transported.

All four of the transport bolts had sheared. As a result, the ‘detached’ parts of the bolts could not be removed from the appliance. Additionally some of the drum casing had broken and pieces of this fell out of the machine. The plumber concluded that in order to cause damage of that nature the machine had been dropped heavily, probably from a height, and that further internal damage was almost certain. Since he was unable to completely remove the transport bolts, he could not even attempt to install the machine.

The defendant, after some argument, agreed to replace the damaged appliance. A delivery was agreed to take place between 8.35 am and 12.35 pm on 14th June, 2014 and the claimant was assured that this time the damaged machine and the old appliance would be removed and that the new appliance would be installed.. The claimant’s tenants once again arranged to be at home to accept delivery and the delivery slot was confirmed via text and email. The defendant failed to make the delivery, collect the old appliance or install the new one and failed to warn the claimant or her tenants that delivery would not take place.

The claimant agreed to one final attempt at delivery to take place on 17th June. The claimant’s tenants were not able to be present therefore the claimant was obliged to attend at the premises to accept delivery. On this occasion the defendant completed the contract in it’s entirety. The new appliance was delivered and installed, with no suggestion that the installation may be dangerous, and both the damaged machine and the old appliance were removed.

The claimant alleges that the defendant is in breach of contract in failing to adhere to the agreed and confirmed delivery time on two occasions, delivering a faulty appliance, failing to even attempt to disconnect and remove the old appliance on 12th June and failing to attempt to install the new appliance on that date.

It is further alleged that the defendant was negligent in failing to deliver the appliance when agreed and failing to notify the claimant and/or her tenants that delivery would not take place when they knew, or ought to have known, that this would cause substantial cost and inconvenience.

As a result of the defendant’s breach of contract and negligence the claimant has suffered loss and damage.

The claimant’s tenants were inconvenienced on three separate occasions, for at least 4 hours on each occasion, during which time they were not able to attend to their normal employment. They were without an operational washing machine for seven days longer than they expected. They had the inconvenience of the new appliance occupying space and causing a hazard in their small hallway for five days and the damaged machine for four days. As a result, the claimant felt obliged to offer her tenants a substantial discount on their rent, amounting to £XXX, to compensate for their wasted time and the inconvenience of having large appliances in their hallway for so long.

The claimant had to attend at the delivery address on two occasions, amounting to at least 8 hours, including travel. This prevented the claimant from undertaking other duties in connection with her business. As a self-employed person the claimant would normally expect to earn approximately £XX per hour net, and the claimant therefore claims £XXX for attendance at the property.

The claimant paid her plumber a call out fee on 13th June amounting to £XX The plumber did not make any charge for disconnection of the old appliance or the aborted installation of the new machine because the claimant is a regular customer.

The claimant incurred other expenses including telephone calls and travel. The claimant was obliged to telephone the defendant on at least 6 occasions. Since it takes in excess of 5 minutes simply to negotiate the automatic switchboard and on at least one occasion the claimant was passed to three different departments, those calls must have amounted to more than 45 minutes in total. There were further telephone calls to the claimant’s tenants and the claimant incurred two return bus fares in attending at the property. The claimant would accept £XX under this head.

And the claimant claims:-

Rent discount £XXX (approximate split of £XXX lost holiday/earnings, £XX inconvenience)

Claimant’s

loss of earnings £XXX

Plumber £XX

Misc £XX

£XXX

 

The claimant also claims interest under section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from 13th June 2014 to 21st October 2014, amounting to £XX, and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a d daily rate of £XX

 

I believe that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true.

 

 

 

 

Signed …………………………………………… Date ………………………………………………

 

Name ……………………………………………..


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that certainly sounds like a result for you, wonder if it means Currys will learn anything from it.


Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fantastic result. Thanks for sharing.

 

Please let us know when you actually recieve the cash so title can be updated


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

 

 

 

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RMW, you did a great job on this one. At this rate, we will have to start a thread where we list all the cases stuffed up by Currys/PCworld


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheque received.


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst this is no longer relevant, I think you should have started this thread in the Legal forums, RMW. You might have had some support along the way.

 

Well done for persevering and excellent news that you have a resolution.


Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy -

HERE

2: Take back control of your finances -

Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors?

Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt

Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated -

Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

 

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This may not get seen as the thread is rather old now, but I've just had a letter from Currys asking me to confirm to the court that they paid the judgement amount.

 

Given the total lack of co-operation from Currys from the start, I'm tempted to be bloody minded and either ignore them or ask for the cost of printing and postage up front.

 

However, should I have told the court they'd paid 18 months ago?


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why bother doing their work for them. They could quite easily contact the court and get a notice of satisfaction. The court may contact you for confirmation.

 

I wonder if they have found a CCJ on their credit file?


If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Why bother doing their work for them. They could quite easily contact the court and get a notice of satisfaction. The court may contact you for confirmation.

 

I wonder if they have found a CCJ on their credit file?

 

Ignore until they contact me again then. Decided.


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

One real bright spot in an otherwise frantic weekend.

On Saturday I received a general form of judgement from the Court. It appears that Currys made an application to have the CCJ marked as satisfied. The judge refused.


RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Magic

 

 

:lol::madgrin::whoo:


Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...