Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wonga writing off debts - can you claimback what you have already paid if they do?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3129 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It shouldnt be a lottery as to whether you benefitted a little or lot depending on the dates involved.

 

I feel like im moaning a lot now lol

 

Just when you think it through logically its so unfair

 

at least with the ppi scandal it was a lot more straightforward and black and white

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The FCA need to clarify if this rule applies regardless of whether you still owe money or not and if not why not as what is the difference apart from them having to pay out extra millions.

 

Be interesting to find out the FCA take on why someone can get say £500 written off because they should have not been lent the money in the first place, yet someone who has paid their debt off in full cannot get any redress when they to should have not been lent the money in the first place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That was a point I raised wilko, their will be plenty of people out their who have only just stated on a repayment plan who will get the whole lot written off I know of one person who has just had £900 written off and good luck to him but this ruling should apply across the board, make no bones about it.

 

And your not moaning wilko you have a valid point as do allot of other people

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im just seeing things in very simple terms

 

they made a profit out of me on at least the one occasion... 100% sure more than once but thats another kettle of fish... so on this one occasion (the active loan) i shouldnt just get £105 wiped off I should get REPAID the interest ive paid so far that i shouldnt have been charged on the loan that they themselves admit shouldnt have been granted

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just finished 15months of hell paying back 2 payday loans,

one with wonga 3 days before the decision was made and

I'm furious that because I've struggled to pay it off

and I don't get any interest or fees back.

 

 

I know other people aren't getting money back as such but it's getting wiped therefore they are gaining.

 

 

I'm writing to wonga today underlining all the reasons why I would never have gotten a loan

under the new lending criteria, then I'm taking it to the fos.

 

 

I've had some interesting reading on there website of people in my situation

who have had all there interest and charges back due to the affordability.

 

 

Also why are wonga the only company to be doing this,

cause I can say that quickquid are much worse than wonga and there will be many more

but they they don't seem to be being held to account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also why are wonga the only company to be doing this,

cause I can say that quickquid are much worse than wonga and there will be many more

but they they don't seem to be being held to account.

 

I bet its because consumer debt is a lit powderkeg over society. On average we owe around 170% of disposable income.

 

If they started applying the same measures to other PDLs it would only be a question of time until it would be expanded to log book loans, store cards, catalogue accounts, current account overdrafts, mortgages and so on which would be dousing the lit powder keg in petrol from an economic point of view.

 

That said, I personally believe all companies should be given the same treatment by the FCA as Wonga, even if it leads to a brutal shock in the economy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having just taken a look at the FOS site I think Wonga is going to have a lot of problems.

 

 

The fact that they have been found to have lent money to people that they shouldn't have is just the start of it.

 

 

I have asked for a statement showing my balance as it stood when I went into my dmp and also the balance at the point when they wiped the debt.

 

 

Time to start a fight

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • 6 months later...

It's taken almost a year (see my post from October on page 1) but the FOS have upheld my complaint against QuickQuid. They are to repay all interest for 76 out of 79 loans, plus simple interest at 8%, plus £350 compensation. It's a huge five figure sum. FOS agreed that QuickQuid's checks were inadequate and that the loans were unaffordable. I can't dance just yet because despite FOS making their final decision 29 days ago, QQ are yet to contact me and are back to ignoring all correspondence from me.

 

I will do the same with Wonga now I think!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...