Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • You're like, super helpful and unhelpful at the same time lol.   What do I search for, I searched form 4, and nothing, I searched claiming compensation and nothing about this.   I can't find the top squares logo.   Can you post a link or tell me what to search.   Sorry if I'm slow.
    • use our custom google search box  click our top squares logo it should appear on that page   dx
    • Apologies, I haven't used a forum for years!!   I defo wish to keep the 2 issues separate, sorry!   My only issue I need help with is the increased compo for marstons - if possible.   I don't know anything about claiming compo etc. (I only recently found out one of the NHS biggest costs are NDA payouts)   I don't know what form 4 is; so far, they've offered £250 and I haven't accepted or denied it.   So yeah, can you forward me to some more info?   Also, usually I'm good at google etc. but I can't find many stories on this stuff, regarding PCN/TFL etc.   Thanks again!
    • ok things are getting clearer...   I've merged 2 of your posts for clarity and removed the swearing, (behave please) I've also taken down the two images you posted should you wish to post things up please use PDF so we can zoom easily and don't forget to redect them read upload carefully.   I think you need to continue to keep the two thing sep. those being increased compo for marstons- if possible ( if you are raising a form 4? complaint through the court - it might be better you don't? - they are very hard to justify and can be costly - so the fact it might not be moving forward could be a good thing, but listen to others here too) and the issue of the PCN wasn't justified - which you need to further expand on please.   the more info you post up the better please but please use multipage PDF files only and carefully redact them    
    • Thanks for trying btw! It's kinda in 2 parts.   1 is that the PCN wasn't justified in the first place and I wasn't aware it had escalated. I received the initial fine from TFL which I challenged and heard nothing back from (for 5 months). Then another letter from a separate PCN which made me email TFL to inquire what was going on but again, heard nothing back.   (BTW I can see how confusing this is so thanks again for trying)   So, I had no idea my car was at the risk of being taken - that's the first part.   No 2. is:   I got a phone call saying my car was on the back of a truck round the corner from mine (they hadn't left any notices or anything, and the car was parked directly outside my house). My friend said they were attaching the straps and securing it to the van (so I think they got it on the back of the van and moved it before securing it).   When I ran round the corner I saw the EA's van. I went upto it and asked what was going on. He was rude and told me to go away. Then after I kept knocking he got out the van and was aggressive and refused to ID himself or tell me why he had my car.   He shouted at me, was rude and unprofessional, he then left with my car. I complained to Marstons and asked for the bodycam footage.   They gave me the footage but it was clearly edited and cut short (because in the beginning of the footage he was the most aggressive).   They then told me he wasn't required to have the camera turned on when he's in the van, only when he's 'actively pursuing a warrant' and I was only allowed the footage I was in. (which is 2 different things) So I asked them to clarify which is true.   Anyway, I reviewed the footage and sent in my complaint (talking about what happened in the footage) They replied and said they watched the footage and disagreed with everything I said.   So I wrote a more in depth response with the CIVEA code to reference + the TFL EA guide etc.    Then they asked for more time, called me and finally apologised and admitted he had acted untoward and was in the wrong.   They then offered me the goodwill payment.   This has taken up weeks of my time, caused me serious trauma and PTSD and even after I complained WITH video evidence, they still initially denied it which means they officially lied, on record, while representing TFL.   I told TFL what was happening they said I had to continue with Marstons etc.   £250 goodwill isn't enough, the car cost £800 to get out, the suspension is messed up and I'd like to claim compensation for everything.   I don't know if that makes me sound like i'm money grabbing or whatever but they shouldn't be allowed to get away with it.   The police had to come before they could call an ambulance cause I was having a panic attack and it was a HORRIBLE experience.    So any help would be great please    I have the whole file from Resolver in a ZIP file but it's a lot of writing and I think you've read enough of my writing to last a life time!   I did a statutory declaration of OOT, got it signed by the court etc. but it was rejected.   I then tried to take them to court but it cost £250 I think which I don't have. You can get it for free if your low income but they wanted bank statements that I couldn't get. They're waiting for me to reply with documents to get a free court date.    did you receive any of the pcn's - was that why you appealed? - Yes, sorry!   unless it's trying secure a greater level of compo from marstons? - Yes, sorry!   For the record I just saw this pop up, read it and now feel much less guilty about my enquiry!
  • Our picks

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1999 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Long time lurker, first time poster. I have used this site for good solid advice in the past and thought it was time to give something back.

 

Until last week I worked for Provident and this is an opportunity to ask a former employee anything. I left the company on good terms and am not using this as an excuse to throw mud at my former employer.

 

I will not disclose company secrets and I won't tell you how to get out of paying back a loan that you've taken out. Beyond that I'm happy to answer any questions you may have.

 

Oh, and I realise that this might look a little suspicious as I'm new to the forum, if any mods want proof that I am who I say I am, I'll be more than happy to provide it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
... I won't tell you how to get out of paying back a loan that you've taken out.

 

That's what we like to hear, the site has never been about how to avoid paying back a legitimate debt.

 

Welcome SP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Story so far...

 

been a customer of provident and greenwoods for over 10 years. Alqays paid loans off in full and from memory always on time.

 

in november 2011 i took out 500 loan with provident (15 repayment per week over 60 weeks)

 

the following month took was offered and took 1,000 loan from greenwoods (20 a week over 104 weeks)

 

in feb 2012 took out 1000 loan with prov at 30 a week over 60 weeks.

 

followed with a final loan of 400 with greenwoods in april 12 (12.80 a week over 55 weeks)

 

So that was 2,900 paid out in less than 6 months with no credit checks or proper affordibility testing. Agents just popped by gave me the money and was just a case of me popping my signature onto the contract.

 

In hindsight this was hardly the proper way things should have been done!

 

So in total I had 5,504 to pay back at 311.20 every 4 weeks!!

 

still not paid everything back and defaulted a long time ago.

 

currently owing 1,600 so paid off 3,904 which is 1,000 more than was borrowed in total on the loans

 

manager calls by once a month and i pay what i can afford which has been 50 a month for last few months.

 

currently just short of 8 grand in debt to a total of 7 creditors

 

in view of fca's decision with wonga about the granting of loans which shouldnt have been offered in your opinion have I got a leg to stand on by arguing that the debt should be written off?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi

 

Story so far...

 

been a customer of provident and greenwoods for over 10 years. Alqays paid loans off in full and from memory always on time.

 

in november 2011 i took out 500 loan with provident (15 repayment per week over 60 weeks)

 

the following month took was offered and took 1,000 loan from greenwoods (20 a week over 104 weeks)

 

in feb 2012 took out 1000 loan with prov at 30 a week over 60 weeks.

 

followed with a final loan of 400 with greenwoods in april 12 (12.80 a week over 55 weeks)

 

So that was 2,900 paid out in less than 6 months with no credit checks or proper affordibility testing. Agents just popped by gave me the money and was just a case of me popping my signature onto the contract.

 

In hindsight this was hardly the proper way things should have been done!

 

So in total I had 5,504 to pay back at 311.20 every 4 weeks!!

 

still not paid everything back and defaulted a long time ago.

 

currently owing 1,600 so paid off 3,904 which is 1,000 more than was borrowed in total on the loans

 

manager calls by once a month and i pay what i can afford which has been 50 a month for last few months.

 

currently just short of 8 grand in debt to a total of 7 creditors

 

in view of fca's decision with wonga about the granting of loans which shouldnt have been offered in your opinion have I got a leg to stand on by arguing that the debt should be written off?

 

 

 

 

 

A clear case of irresponsible lending imo.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think people need to remember that not being able to pay back your loan doesn't automatically entitle you to get your interest back

or for your debt to be written off.

 

 

the story in the news is more so about that based on the information at the time of taking the loan

that it should have been obvious that it wasnt affordable for many reasons

 

 

such as not enough income for the amount borrowed

or a bad credit history that shows unlikely to pay back

or is already struggling with debts.

 

 

if your circumstances changed after you took out the loan

like change of job, became ill or became wreckless or unable to manage your money properly when you did before

and then defaulted on the loan that wouldnt count as it was not originally a bad lending decision.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a very fair point.. and to be fair they were taken out before I got embroiled in payday lender debts. I suppose ive only myself to blame for decisions made but I think lending without credit checks isnt good business practice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd hold off giving Stg Pepper any personal details until CAG can verify who they are.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wilko,

 

Sorry for the late reply.

 

2 questions for you.

 

1. Every time a new loan was issued

the agent should also have completed a separate form with you called the customer details form.

 

 

On that form is a (very very basic) income and expenditure statement that should have been completed

to assess your financial situation at the time of issue.

 

 

Do you remember doing this?

 

 

When loans are being issued over such a short period I have seen agents not recording the repayments

for previous issues on the form thus making your finances appear better than they actually are.

 

 

Up until very recently the Provy and Greenwoods agents would act completely autonomously of each other

so I would be interested to know if each agent recorded the repayments for the other brand?

 

2. I doubt it given the short period between the issues

but can I assume that when you were given all these loans you were given the full value in your hand?

i.e. the agent didn't use some of the balance to pay off a previous loan in an attempt to "manage" your weekly repayments.

 

Cheers

 

SP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SP

 

I do recall agent moaning about all the new forms they had to fill out but for me all what happened was a very very brief conversation - how much rent do you pay, i cant evdn recall being asked about exiating debts. Nor do i recall being given a copy of the form he filled out.

 

As for paying off existing loans - no... all loans barring the april 2012 one still have outstanding balances so none of the borrowed money went towards paying anything off.

 

I feel very embarrased about being so stupid but when you have a gambling problem and you 'need' money its very easy to take whats been offered to you

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember being told when i got £1000 that he 'wasnt allowed to do £1000 as one loan' so had to sign 2 separate loans at 500 each

 

clearly was just a money making scheme, there were no questions about why I even needed/wanted the money. I guess if was just a case of lending out as much as possible as the more you lend the more profit can be made

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two separate loans at £500 will cost exactly the same as one at £1000 in interest charges,

the reason they do this is to make refinancing easier further down the line.

 

 

The terms have changed slightly since you took your loans so I'll use the new ones for my example as I find them easier to work with.

 

 

This example isn't really helpful to your situation but it might serve as a warning for others looking to take out further credit with Provy.

 

Say you borrow £1000 over 63 weeks the cost is £30pw or or £1890 over the term,

a £500 over 63 weeks will cost £15pw or £945 over the term.

If after 35 weeks you are looking for more credit (or the local office is in the middle of a sales drive)

and you still owe £840 it makes it difficult to refinance you as the company would need to lend you at least £1600

(the minimum cash in hand percentage they must give without authorisation is 50%)

 

 

If however you have 2 loans of £500 you still technically owe £840 but there is only £420 outstanding on either loan

- the company can then refinance you with a loan of £850 thus putting up your rate less than if they'd refinanced you at £1600.

 

My suggestion to you would be to SAR them.

 

 

Get copies of all the CDF's that were completed at the time of issue.

 

 

Your best hope is if the existing loans were not recorded in the "all other loan repayments" field on the form.

 

 

Whilst I may have said that the agents acted autonomously of each other that wasn't because they had to,

frankly it was because they could

- the facilities have always been available for them to verify any amounts that you are already paying

to the company regardless of what brand the loan is with.

 

 

Should this be the case the company has not demonstrated responsible lending in my opinion

and somebody more knowledgeable than myself can tell you how to proceed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...