Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Should this ever happen to me, I will make an appeal at the first stage to avoid any problems that may occur at a later stage. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Atos


Bobfish7271
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3488 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone give me advice on what to do next? i was on esa for 12 months but just had it stopped after ATOS assessment gave me no points.

I don't mind going back to work but I was ill after major surgery to my shoulder but my assessment only considers how i am now. what about all the recovery time it took and the extra benefit i lost because of THEIR long delays?. Please anyone who can help. I'm at the end of my tether getting deeper in debt and now suffering from depression and anxiety. Not sure I can take much more.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am dreading my assessment - seems to be focussed mostly on physical rather than mental. I also will score ZERO I know that. If they want me back on JSA, fine, won't last long as I am due major surgery in the next few months so will be back on ESA faster than DWP can say "better off in work" I am sure a prospective employer will be glad to hear someone they are thinking of taking on has ongoing anxiety and depression problems as well as impending major surgery - what a great candidate I seem

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bobfish7271,

 

I'm not an expert, but I've gone through the appeal process. It seems the ATOS medical is no longer about your physical or mental abilities. The medical now seeks to determine WHAT YOU CAN DO and HOW YOU'D COPE in a working environment. ESA seemingly has a very different focus on your medical condition from that of IB. I believe they operate on the assumption that everybody can do some thing in the workplace. I can only say that you need to get an appeal underway ASAP.

 

If you're lucky enough to have one, go to the citizen's advice bureau (CAB) and ask for help in lodging an appeal against the DWP's decision that you are "fit for work". You also need to get in touch with the DWP and request a mandatory reconsideration within a month of their decision that you are "fit for work".

 

The DWP have added the 'mandatory reconsideration' recently as a step, to allow them to look-again at the decision. Some see this as a delaying tactic, or a wicked flurry of red-tape to dissuade appeals.

 

The mandatory reconsideration occurs in-house; it can theoretically take as much time as they fancy, I think the norm is 6-8 weeks. No ESA benefits are payable during this period, so you may be required to sign-on for JSA to get any money to live on. You can submit new medical evidence during the period of the mandatory reconsideration and it will be considered by the decision maker.

 

You may have a need to get a lawyer to gather medical evidence. Medical report from specialist normally involves a fee. If you're unemployed or in a low-income household, I think you'll qualify for legal-aid.

 

Your medical evidence will establish the extent of your injury, expected healing time, etc. Your feelings of anxiety and depression and the associated delays will also be important in determining your fitness for work at the time of the medical. Also, the fact that you are awaiting further treatment.

 

It may be in your interest to find a welfare rights office (possibly at your local housing association or social work department), if there is none at your local CAB.

 

I hope my rambling answer helps.

 

Best wishes

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, had my atos medical 3 weeks ago, mine was all about the physical side, then one of the 2 doctors asked me at the end of the medical, oh any change in your mental state.1hour about my physical, 30 seconds about my mental state.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are clever, I will give them that - they know the majority of ESA claims are going to be anxiety and depression as there is still a stigma over these conditions and people think you can simply get a GP appointmentand get some pills and get signed off work/JSA - problem is for all the people that do try it on (small % I hope) most are genuine people with anxiety and depression problems. ATOS seems to be all about physical rather than mental so many people score ZERO

Link to post
Share on other sites

well got that brown letter from dwp 3weeks after my atos medical,well shocked scored zero points but moved from wrag group to support group for 2years.passed a descriptor in my physical abilities only,nothing for my mental abilities.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...