Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mkdp Claimform - old 2005 HSBC Credit card 'debt'


Sticker
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3483 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I would appreciate some advice please.

 

I received a claim from MKDP, issued by Northampton CC.

 

 

I submitted an Acknowledgement of Service.

 

 

I now have until October 7th to submit a defence.

I sent a CPR 31.14 to MKDP, to which they have replied, stating:

 

'Unfortunately at this time we are unable to fulfil your request

and as such we will need to liase with the original lender to request the appropriate documents.

We will forward these to you upon receipt but this may take up to 8 weeks.

 

However we draw your attention to the fact that this claim is for a balance less than £10,000.00

and the normal track will be the small claims track which is governed by the Rules and Practice Directions of CPR 27.

 

This means that part 31 of the rules is not applicable to your claim pursuant to CPR 27.2 (1)(b) and CPR 31.1 (2).

It is not our intention to obstruct proceedings, on the contrary it is our view that the early disclosure of documents assists in reaching settlement.

 

It is also worth noting that we are required to file and serve on you and the Court copies of all documents

upon which we intend to rely at least 14 days prior to any date fixed for a final hearing in order to substantiate our claim in compliance with CPR 27.4.

 

Please note that now a claim has been issued it is your repsonsibility to file a response and we may enter judgement

if an Acknowledgement of Service or Defence is not filed at the appropriate time. For the avoidance of doubt i

t is our contention that you are in a position whereby you can respond to the claim form to the extent

that you can admit or deny both liability and quantum without sight of any documents.

 

I have tonight just spoken to the company as this has been an ongoing issue with them.

When they initially acquired the debt,

they moved the default date by 6 months,

to which I raised a dispute (dispute raised in March 14.)

 

 

Equifax supported me in getting the default date reinstated to its original date,

but since that dispute, MKDP have been sending me letters saying

'unfortunately we are unable to supply you with documentation at this time.'

 

 

I thought nothing of it (as I believed - naievly - they would continue the 'paperwork' route until they could enter into an agreement with me)

until I received the claim.

 

 

I spoke to the company tonight, as I wanted to know why they went to court if they were still sending me these letters.

The company told me on the phone that they requested the documents from

HSBC and so far they have received 17 pages of statements.

 

The debt is an HSBC credit card which was opened in 2005.

The amount is for less than £10,000, and I defaulted, due to redundancy just over 2 years ago.

 

My question is

- I am now unsure as to what to plead as my defence,

or how to go about writing this.

 

 

Everything seems tied up with legal jargon,

and I don't want to write something wishy washy which may mean a judgement is made.

 

Advice appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im having issues with these people as well (Mkdp). Reason they have gone to court, is hoping for a default judgement against you and us....

 

 

Sticker it is not going to help, posting every day with a different title same details.

 

 

keep it in one area, Allow people some time to have a read and reply.

 

 

Tigs

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri I cant see how you got missed

 

 

have you sent the claimant a CCA request.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

when did you last pay this

and was this an HSBC card or an HFC card

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant -

MKDP

 

Date of issue –

04 September, 2014

 

Date of issue -

7th October (AOS submitted)

 

What is the claim for – the reason they have issued the claim?

The Claimant claims the sum of 3,638.85 being monies due from the Defendant

to the Claimant under a regulated agreement originally between the Defendant and HSBC Bank plc.

 

The Defendants account number was xxxxx and was

assigned to the client on 28/10/2013,

notice of this has been provided to the Defendant.

 

The Defendant has failed to make payments in accordance with the terms of the agreement

and a default notice has been served pursuant to the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

The Claimant claims the sum of 3,638.85 and costs.

Tne Complainant has complied, as far as is necessary,

with the pre-action conduct practice direction.

 

What is the value of the claim?

Total amount – 3823.85 (including court fees)

 

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account?

CARD CARD

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007?

2005 (I believe September)

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim.

It is MKDP – a debt purchaser

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment?

I was aware, however have received no proof

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor?

Yes

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ?

No

 

Why did you cease payments:-

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved?

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into debt management plan?

I was made redundant – I did not enter into a debt management plan – I was not offered this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

what is the date on the claimform top right please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you must file your defence by midnight Monday 6th

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The date on the form is 4th September.

 

I'm not sure how to word my defence - does it need to be worded in a specific manner, or can I just plainly lay out the facts?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you have not sent a CCA request?

 

 

that was your most omportant thing to do after AOS?

 

 

bit late now

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I filed a cca request at the same time as the CPR 31.14 but they have only replied to the cpr31.14.

 

I'm not sure why you needed to reply in such a manner. I'm asking for advice from somebody that may be able to help me. If you can't give it, then there's no need to reply with something unhelpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

sri it came over that way

there was no indication of a cca request before being sent

 

 

ok well looks like you are in a good position then.

 

 

just file the no paperwork/holding defence

widely available in most threads in the forum you are in.

 

 

but post it up here please

so the knowledgably ones can check it

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...