Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that i thought id just ask as i was unsure.  Just hope its returned to me and doesnt spend the rest of its life going back and forth to Singapore  
    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Private Parking Fine- Ldl car park


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5009 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I suspect that there is no "strong disagreement" - just my lack of elequence in not explaining myself very well.

 

My point is that there is nothing wrong with a private company having a paid car park, it is perfectly acceptable, we all use them. Using a barrier on exit is more sensible than pay & display as it removes all doubt as to who the contract for parking is with. Pay & display really does not work for private car parks.

 

What is not acceptable is to impose additional charges for "overtime", "parking out of bays" etc which bear no relation to the normal parking charge - fines in other words.

 

I agree fully to Zamzara's statement, just wish I were as elequent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

"I trespassed onto private property and now I'm being sued.. boo hoo hoo"

 

I bet most of the folks complaining on this forum would not dream of breaking into a hotel because, oh, there's 300 rooms and a lot look like they're empty, but they think it's perfectly ok to park on a private carpark because "oh look, there's a space".

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet most of the folks complaining on this forum would not dream of breaking into a hotel because, oh, there's 300 rooms and a lot look like they're empty, but they think it's perfectly ok to park on a private carpark because "oh look, there's a space".

At the risk of troll feeding....

 

I bet that most folks complaining would not dream of obtaining money by deception, committing fraud, breaking case law or by [causing problems] people with documents that are designed to mimic official ones like the majority of the PPCs do.

 

Why don't you crawl back under your bridge Mr Troll?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This does not constitute legal advice and is not represented as a substitute for legal advice from an appropriately qualified person or firm.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

"I trespassed onto private property and now I'm being sued.. boo hoo hoo"

 

I bet most of the folks complaining on this forum would not dream of breaking into a hotel because, oh, there's 300 rooms and a lot look like they're empty, but they think it's perfectly ok to park on a private carpark because "oh look, there's a space".

Don't know where your from Ranger, but if in Scotland there is no law of trespass, except recently, Govt buildings (Follywood) and Royal residencies have some protection under the law of trespass. I very much doubt that Lidl would get any Scottish lawyer to act on their behalf in a trespass case.

I agree, it must be most annoying for owners of private land to find every Jack &his dog use it as their own car park. Clear signage is probably the cheapest deterrent, but won't stop the arrogent or airheads.

Link to post
Share on other sites

"I trespassed onto private property and now I'm being sued.. boo hoo hoo"

 

I bet most of the folks complaining on this forum would not dream of breaking into a hotel because, oh, there's 300 rooms and a lot look like they're empty, but they think it's perfectly ok to park on a private carpark because "oh look, there's a space".

 

That would be breaking and entering which IS a criminal offence. Just like invoices purporting to be from an official body like the council or the police

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Check National-Clamps web site, the page for making payments.

 

Notice at the bottom, the bit about immobilisation being carried out by franchees of a firm in the BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS.

 

One hopes that this is not a tax [problem]! They will of course declare all the money to the relevant tax authority, though I believe that company documents declare them to be a "small company exempt" ie not subject to external auditing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Hello TheRanger,

 

If someone has tresspassed on your property I would remind you that we were all born in to this world and it is ours to share with one another.

 

How long have you been in private parking? You seem a little stressed - I recommend moving to the coast and taking up guitar playing - very relaxing :)

 

Now, have I told you about my friend that got wheel clamped? You never guess what - he took a pair of bolt cutters to the clamp lol £300 they wanted oh dear - the little wheel clampers obviously didn't know anything about contract law now did they?

 

P.S. Mummy soneone played in my car park - I WANT TO SEND THEM LOTS OF NASTY LETTERS AND TAKE THEM TO COURT boo hoo hoo I'm so cross I might even pretend to be a baliff.

 

Just grow up

09/07/09 :)Business Studies BA(Hons) 2:1:)

 

eCar Insurance overpayment - £325

Settled in full - 15/09/08

NatWest Student A/C bank charges - £260

Settled under hardship scheme - 08/06/09

Natwest Business A/C bank charges - £60

Settled in full as GOGW - 20/04/09

Santander Consumer Finance late payment fees - £60

Part settled for £48 - 01/03/08

Peugeot Finance late payment fees - £50

Settled in full before county court hearing - 01/09/09

Peugeot Finance overpayment of £247

Settled in full - 01/12/08

Valley Leisure - complaint about collections agent

£160 part refund of gym membership in compensation - 01/02/09

HFC Bank - complaint about payment deducted from my account on wrong date

GOGW £10 - 01/05/09

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Hi I'm new to this, so hope someone out there can help!

 

My office is a shared building with parking bays allocated to various companies, therefore not every member of staff has a bay, and so I usually park a few streets away from my office. However in the school holidays the bays are often empty so sometimes staff park in bays which aren’t allocated to them.

 

I was late for work by 45 minutes a few days ago and so parked in an empty bay belonging to one of the other companies so I could get to work faster. I parked at 9.45am. When I went to my car at 5.30 I had a ticket from Met Parking Services with a £100 fine, reduced by 50% if paid in 14days. It wasn’t until I got home that I saw that the ticket said it was issued at 9.10am, which simply wasn’t possible. Despite the fact that I did park in a space which wasn’t allocated to me, the ticket was issued incorrectly, I wonder how valid this ticket is?

 

I checked for any signage today, and could see only one sign, on the approach to the parking bays, which is at knee height. The terms of ‘contract’ are presented, but one sign seems inadequate – it is quite small and very low.

 

Although, between you and I, I know that I shouldn’t have parked there, I wonder if I still have grounds not to pay purely because they issued the ticket supposedly at 9.10 am when I was 15 miles away stuck in traffic. I am no longer living at the address registered with the DVLA, I moved home 4 weeks ago and havent gotten around to updating the DVLA yet, so any further demands for payment will go to my old address (my parents’ home). I understand that private parking companies have no grounds for ‘enforcement’ or to send debt collectors? Should I decide not to pay up, I’d hate to think of anyone banging on my mother’s door demanding money!?

 

I wonder if you might advise me, would you suggest I contact them and appeal, pay up or ignore them.

 

Any advice would be much appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to read around an here. Its a mail [problem] and they won't be knocking on doors. NEVER contact a PPC, there is no 'appeal' that is just part of the [problem] to pull you in. Old address is okay for real DVLA purposes as you are contactable via it but you should update that sometime soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks lamma. i've had a look on the site this morning and it seems everybody just says to ignore the ticket. its just a nagging doubt in the back of my mind. but i can argue that i wasnt there at 9.10am I guess and they need to prove that I was...?

 

so should i just stick the ticket in the back of my cupboard, not write to inform them that I won't be paying?

 

Thanks for your help!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would still be down to a Court to decide the contract was not valid.

Not quite, if the "parking charge" was deducted by an employer, and the employee had signed a contract with a clause agreeing to these charges, his only recourse would be to an Employment Tribunal, claiming for Unlawful Deduction of Wages.

 

You can only get to one of these once you had been through the proper grievance procedure with the employer, and been through the ACAS system.

 

So you would have to produce a legal argument to convince, preferably the employer, or if not a Tribunal comprising employment specialist solicitors / trade unionists, that the terms of the contract of employment were invalid because they contain an unfair penalty clause. Might be a tricky one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the ticket was left on my windscreen and has nothing to do with my employer. my employer has nothing to with the parking charge, so its a case of:

 

a) do i write to MET and say im not paying, or

b) do i ignore them completely

 

b) b) an B) again! Never have any contact with a PPC in any shape or form unless it is across the court room.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have received a parking charge because, although I had bought a ticket, Euro Car Parks do not provide sticky tickets, and when I shut the car door, the ticket must have blown off the dash board!

 

The day I got the ticket, I photocopied the charge notice and ticket, and posted it to Euro car parks, explaining that as I had paid for a ticket then could they cancel the fine. I have now received a reply, saying "It is the responsibility of the vehicle driver, prior to leaving the vehicle to ensure that a valid pay and display ticket is clearly visible on the dashboard or facia panel for an attendant to see" they say "Our attendant would not know at the time that you had a valid pay & display ticket, therefore the pcn was issued correctly and remains payable".

 

I see all your thread regarding Euro Car Parks say they won't follow it up, if they really did (I still have the ticket) would I win in court?

 

Thanks

Alethea

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I got a fine for parking in a disabled bay and not displaying a blue badge..in a retail park out side super drug.....the reason i did park there was i am ill but dont have a blue badge...the day i parked in this bay i hadnt noticed untill i got out of my car that it was a disabled space, but i was genuinly feeling so ill at that time and only needing to be in the chemist (superdrug) for about 5-10 mins i didnt think it would be a problem, on my return i had a fine....40 pound i think it was if i paid within 14 days otherwise it would be 120...i came on this site and read up all the things about this and decided i was going to ignore all the stuff that came from these people....which i have up to now, I have now today got a letter from Roxburge debt collectors demanding i now pay £172 for their client TPS Parking Solutions Ltd within 7 days or they will pass it on to their solicitors. I came on here tonight to confirm i am right by ignoring this....and now i am panicking like mad...think i have read it all wrong and i should have paid the original fine before i end up having to pay loads to them...as i did see a sign saying a blue badge had to be displayed, but there was plenty of other spaces it was nearly time for the shops to close, I was going to claim I didnt have a blue badge as i dont want the world knowing im ill, ut now im having doubts about it all...please help..:confused:

Bev Walker:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

total [problem] , and just what are the solicitors going to do ,,, say booh you to you

 

in the first place blue badge bays on private property mean nothing and in fact could be challenged as being unlawfull under the DDA

 

keep ignoring like you have so far

 

and the most important fact IT IS NOT A FINE Private parking Companies CANNOT ISSUE A FINE its a [problem] invoice

NEVER FORGET

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Help Our Hero's Website

 

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/

 

HIGHWAY OF HEROES

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/181826-last-tribute-our-lads.html

 

Like Cooking ? check the Halogen Cooker thread

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bear-garden/218990-cooking-halogen-cookers.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...