Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

So Stressed as boss has started bullying and picking on me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3493 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, hope someone can be of help her as I am on the verge of breakdown.

 

 

I have worked for the same company (small firm of solicitors) for 13 years as senior paralegal. The firm is very small and I mean me, boss (senior partner) and 2 secretary's.

 

 

Everything has been ok although my boss does have some strange ways and finds it very difficult to interact socially with people and rather than speak to his staff he leaves sticky notes!!!

 

 

about 12 months ago he decided to take more of a back seat role but needed to employ another member of staff to take over his workload (the area of law that he deals with is not the same as mine, I have no knowledge of his area). He employed a lady who simply could not work with him and left and a couple of months later employed another lady with the same thing happening.

 

 

About 6 months ago he employed a lady who I suspect is a relative of his. She came from another Firm and brought her secretary with her. From then on my life has been made a nightmare. I had my own office however as there was no free office for this lady I was told on the day she was starting that I would have to move from my office to accommodate her!!. I now have to sit in the reception area with the secretaries and answer phones and deal with clients etc.

 

 

My line of work means that I am constantly dealing with clients and court hearings etc but I have now been told that I am only able to make appointments to see clients when this other woman is not there (she works 2 full days and 2 half days) so basically I am only able to see clients for a total of 4 hours over the week.

 

 

This lady works until 2pm 3 days and on theses days is allowed an hour lunch break (which her secretary takes at the same time!!) I start at 9.15 due to school run and have for the past 5 years but am only allowed a 30 minute lunch break.

 

 

Non of this lady's work is checked and she signs her own post without boss even seeing it. My post is checked by boss and he has started picking up on the slightest detail often crossing through letters/scribbling over them.

 

 

New lady and her secretary leave office at least 10 mins early "to avoid traffic" leaving me to turn of close up etc.

 

 

My boss has now stepped up his game and told me that he now only needs me 4 days a week. Finally he is constantly telling me to do cabinet checks on all my files "by tomorrow" (about 100 files) and at the moment he is telling me to leave my current urgent work, not deal with post and review/close off all dormant files (non urgent). I started this day before yesterday and today I have come in to a load of sticky notes saying this is wrong and that is wrong and why have I not dealt with this file and that file (ones 2 days ago he told me to leave.

 

 

I cant cope with much more. I would leave today if I had another job the stress is so bad but I am a single parent and need the money. Can anyone give me some guidance or advice I would be most grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't suffer in silence. Make an appointment to see your boss face to face and in private.

 

Tell him briefly what you've told us, apart from this woman being a suspected relative. Follow it up eith a written greivance, clearly headed as such.

 

There is no doubt you are being eased out. Nothing will come of it. In fact, your treatment may get worse. However, a lodged greivance will be your safety net for when you are pushed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks. I have come in this morning and he has taken ALL my files out of the filing cabinets with sticky notes for reviews, why this and why that. I am good at my job but because the workload is so high and there is only me (I have no secretary and run all the office admin etc as well as doing his typing when he is overworked) sometimes things get a bit behind but it is the same for him if not worse.

 

 

I am not sure what to put in a grievance letter is there a template and I will draft one over the weekend. My four days have already kicked in so I am not back in work until Tuesday.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's probably a good idea to chat to this man first on a private friendly level. Make an appointment and shhut the door so there are no distractions. You just have to tell him politely that the post-it notes upset you - as they would most people - and that communication needs to improve.

 

Tell him you feel undermined and undervalued ever since your hours and workstation changed. Tell him you object to being left to lock up every night, your lack of support, your increasing stress etc.

 

Mention you are a single mother who needs flexibility over child care arrangements. Important: Check your employment contract regarding your hours and job role.

 

Listen carefully to his response. Jot it down while you are there. Check the law on childcare and contractural working hours. If they are being breached spell it out in your greivance letter. Keep it concise and try to keep focus on your legal rights. This is with a view of having a comeback if you are unfairly or constructively dismissed.

 

Time to be assertive!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much you have really helped. The crazy thing is that I don't have a contract of employment, none of the staff do !!

 

 

I have made an appointment in his diary for Tuesday and I am going to write down everything I need to say to him over the weekend. I am really emotional at the moment as on top of this I have not long lost my dad. I didn't take any time off and felt I got no support at work. I am now actively looking for another job as I think that is the only way out but I feel so devastated after being so loyal to him for many years

Link to post
Share on other sites

Section 1-3 of the Employment Rights Act entitles you by law to a written contract. Section 4 entitles you to written variation to the contract.

 

You have been there 13 years. Whatever your working hours normally were are the implied terms, which can't be changed without varying the contract.

 

You need to spell out that the recent reduction to 4 days may be a breach of contract, as well as the change in your duties. Problem is, if you accept it, it becomes your new terms unless you do lodge a complaint. It could be a good idea to consult your local CAB, Law Centre or lawyer with a view to clarifying the legal position.

 

To claim constructive dismissal you would need to resign fairly promptly stating the same reasons as in your written greivance: this is crucial (HOWEVER, do not mention resignation before they have a chance to rectify matters). You need to go through the stages one step at a time.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds like he would find it really difficult if you left. Hopefully this can be resolved if you are completely up front with him about what has gone wrong, and what needs to be fixed to keep you there.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all. Just an update on what has happened since I last posted. As I advised I booked a meeting with boss on Tuesday, this was done well in advance in the diary (we have a case management diary so all appointments are on screen for all to see!!) When I got into work on Tuesday there was a "meeting out of office" booked in for him an hour before our scheduled meeting and he was not due to return until I was out of office at Court!!!. So I never got to put to him all my carefully planned and set out grievances :x no surprise there. I suspect he knew what the meeting was about and I know he will avoid a face to face meeting with me

 

Since then he has been as nice as nice can be...only 1 post it note....asking me to help with one of his files:| I am being cautious though and keeping a record of everything...even keeping the post it notes!!! just in case.. This few weeks has made me think though about things and the fact that I dont want to work somewhere that stresses me out so much that I go home and cry:Cry: so my CV is out there and more importantly I have realised I AM GOOD AT WHAT I DO lol so I am going to try and do some freelance :shock:and see how it goes. I am not expecting happy ever after but I have realised there is nothing I can do to change him or what happens so ..reduced stress levels...and I will dictate my future not some arrogant bully.

 

Once again thank you so much for the posts/advice this site is a godsend and I am more than happy to offer advice in my areas of "expertise" x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the new lady a solicitor and you are, without meaning to be rude, an unqualified paralegal (I mean without formal legal qualifications, I don't doubt you are good at what you do).

 

Is it a really specialised niche area of law or just a small high street firm?

 

I ask because the answers could explain some of the things which are upsetting you.

 

I'm afraid I often communicate by post-it, leaving files on my assistant's desk with notes on saying what I want done, this is simply because he leaves after me and it is often during that time that I have chance to deal with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is unfortunate. To be honest a lot of the stuff you are describing is very familiar. I often have short notice meetings out of the office and have to communicate with juniors/secretaries by post-it notes because I am so busy. I will also pick up on the slightest details in letters. External correspondence simply has got to be 100% correct - if a junior or paralegal drafts a letter with, for example, incorrect use of "Yours sincerely" and "Yours faithfully" or perhaps a comma after the "Yours sincerely" it will be checked and they will have to print it again.

 

Asking you to review firm files to unreasonable timelines is unreasonable, but it may be that the boss does not understand how long it takes because he won't have done it for many years. It is your responsibility to inform him why it takes time, keep him updated on your progress and just do what you reasonably can in the time available.

 

A lot of this stuff I imagine will be quite standard for law firms and will be the same if you move elsewhere. Though ultimately if you are feeling too stressed then its not worth it and it may be better to politely move on.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

StevemLS - No this other lady is not a solicitor, she has no legal qualifications at all. She has worked in conveyancing for about 4 years but not sure what she did before. I have legal qualifications, I have a law degree and LPC and have worked in my areas of law for 20 years. It is a very small office, he is there all the time so there is no need for post it notes but his problem is that he has very bad social skills, he finds it very difficult to speak to people face to face and he has lost god knows how many very good staff members because of his attitude.

 

 

Steampowered - I have been doing this job for 20 years but I don't have a problem with my post being checked after all the senior partner has overall responsibility if mistakes are made. My problem is this lady signs and sends out her own post...he does not even see what she sends out. She has already had 2 complaints from clients. My files are constantly reviewed because of the nature of the work. He knows this because I have regular file meetings with him and I am constantly discussing my cases with him. What is annoying is that he is picking out files that are not urgent for example a few files that were opened but client has decided not to proceed for one reason or the other while I have about 30k's worth of new files that need to be opened and dealt with and he is telling me to leave these!!! don't make sense.

 

 

You are right though he wont change and this will keep cropping up and I have worked here long enough to know that so I think it is time for a change

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for clarification lady.

 

I guess if it is part of his personality, you are right, it is not going to change.

 

However, I can quite see why you find it undermining.

 

One thing I would caution against, and it is very difficult, is allowing this to build in your mind such that you start to read ill-will into tiny things on a daily basis. That way lays ill health.

 

I think you have probably reached the right conclusion that it may be time for a change. Sometimes that point is simply reached. Is it too late to do a training contract and fully qualify as a solicitor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't a use by date for the LPC. However after so long the poster would have to join another firm and would be behind everyone else already at the firm waiting a TC. Also, the posters salary is likely to plummet considerably. Many law firms will put a trainee on the lowest salary they're allowed to, regardless of what their salary was before and the once qualified will start on the bottom salary rung for newly qualified sols.

 

Is it worth it to be able to say your now a solicitor? I'd use evidence of experience to negotiate a good salary elsewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There isn't a use by date for the LPC. However after so long the poster would have to join another firm and would be behind everyone else already at the firm waiting a TC. Also, the posters salary is likely to plummet considerably. Many law firms will put a trainee on the lowest salary they're allowed to, regardless of what their salary was before and the once qualified will start on the bottom salary rung for newly qualified sols.

 

Is it worth it to be able to say your now a solicitor? I'd use evidence of experience to negotiate a good salary elsewhere.

 

I'd agree with this.

 

After 20 years experience going back to work on minimum wage for 18-24 months as a trainee is a backwards step.

 

There are plenty of career paralegals etc and with 20 years of experience the OP should be able to leave and find an equally paid job at another law firm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...