Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, but all you'd do is blindly run the statute barred date for another 18 months. Just sit on your hands until you get a letter of claim, then send a CCA request.  
    • Just like last time, Evri requested more time so they have another 2 weeks
    • Just an update, finance company rejected my complaint saying they've found damage but can't tell when it's from even though I've shown them how the front end is misaligned in the advert photos compared to another identical model car they're selling.  Dealership now want to charge me to get the car brought back to me but will only discuss over the phone which seems off. They're also saying no damaged was picked up by JLR main dealership before I purchased it but my local JLR dealerships till this day haven't mentioned the damage to me because they don't go into stuff like that for some reason lol  Ombudsman case is still open, not sure if I should leave the car with them or just pay to have it brought back.
    • Hi all, I get esa and pip,  I have £1200 in arrears that I owed my ex partner, I have been paying £100 per month to clear this debt that was setup by standing order, as I have complex needs I forgot about this standing order and have overpaid mainternance by around £4000, I told CSA I am happy for my ex partner to keep overpayment I do not wish to seek anything back, however they have declined to take of the sum of £1200 and are still saying I owe this to my ex partner. In my second question it was announced that pip would stop for mental health, I don't understand the link below Disability benefits system to be reviewed as PM outlines "moral mission" to reform welfare - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK The Prime Minister has outlined a package of sweeping reforms to put work at the heart of welfare and... Does this mean my money is going to stop? I have spoken to my key worker and I am already recieveing help from mental health team and complex needs team along with connections and mind, I just don't get what is going on.
    • No, i haven't had one for about 10+ years. I am thinking of just going to the court in person and pay at the counter
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

BCW default for provident loan never taken out non existent debt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3474 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

HI Guys

 

Hope you can help - my partner just had a look at there CR and has an ok rating apart from a few credit cards and searches and 1 default - thing is

 

the default is with BCW - for an apparent provident debt

 

She called Experiean to find out what the debt was for - who directed her to call BCW - where she spoke to an absolute cretin of a man who by the way was incredibly aggressive, and totally unhelpful.

 

The debt was apparently taken out in 2008 and defaulted in 2009 - however

My partner is foreign - and has only lived in the UK since Aug 2010

She had lived in the UK before in 2001-2002 (working holiday @18 )

 

She then permanently moved over in 2010 - so I fail to understand how she could have racked up a debt for over £1000 without being in the country.

 

When she tried to reason with the guy over the telephone - and asked him what documentation they need to prove the debt is false he literally said "that's up to you" -

 

He will be sending out the apparent original agreement - ( my partner did ask him why he needs to send this out as it is obviously not her, but he is sending it out non the less)

 

My question is - where do we go from here - what type of documentation should we be getting together as proof that she was not here around that time.

 

As a side note - from what I have read defaults stay on record for 6 years - the "account" was defaulted in Oct 2009 - would it just be worth waiting until October for it to fall off ?

 

Any advice you guys could offer would be great

 

Buma

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wait while this agreement arrives and then you will be able to say for certain that it wasn't your partner - you will also be able to make a complaint to the information commissioner on the basis that - despite advising that it couldn't possibly have been your partner who entered into this agreement - BCW were nonetheless happy to send out another person's information.

 

IMHO, a strongly worded complaint to their Head /registered office explaining why it couldn't be your partner's debt and requesting the default be removed, is in order. You should head your letter "Formal Complaint" and send it via recorded delivery post.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI Guys

 

Hope you can help - my partner just had a look at there CR and has an ok rating apart from a few credit cards and searches and 1 default - thing is

 

the default is with BCW - for an apparent provident debt

 

She called Experiean to find out what the debt was for - who directed her to call BCW - where she spoke to an absolute cretin of a man who by the way was incredibly aggressive, and totally unhelpful.

 

The debt was apparently taken out in 2008 and defaulted in 2009 - however

My partner is foreign - and has only lived in the UK since Aug 2010

She had lived in the UK before in 2001-2002 (working holiday @18 )

 

She then permanently moved over in 2010 - so I fail to understand how she could have racked up a debt for over £1000 without being in the country.

 

When she tried to reason with the guy over the telephone - and asked him what documentation they need to prove the debt is false he literally said "that's up to you" -

 

He will be sending out the apparent original agreement - ( my partner did ask him why he needs to send this out as it is obviously not her, but he is sending it out non the less)

 

My question is - where do we go from here - what type of documentation should we be getting together as proof that she was not here around that time.

 

As a side note - from what I have read defaults stay on record for 6 years - the "account" was defaulted in Oct 2009 - would it just be worth waiting until October for it to fall off ?

 

Any advice you guys could offer would be great

 

Buma

 

 

 

Hi, that's the first lesson learnt the hard way, never attempt to speak to as debt collection agency on the phone.

 

 

Wait for the copy of the agreement before doing anything.

 

 

The default will be removed OCTOBER 2015.

Provident is a "doorstep Loan Company, it is not unknown for this type of loan to be taken out fraudulently by someone who perhaps moves into a property and finds old correspondence in a previous occupants name.

 

 

The agreement should reveal all.

 

 

When it's received come back to the thread.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

surely compensation is inline here if it can be proved its nothing to do with the OP?

wrongful default

damage to credit profile

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

surely compensation is inline here if it can be proved its nothing to do with the OP?

wrongful default

damage to credit profile

 

 

dx

Certainly is dx.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Again

 

Every one

- still have not received any credit agreement from BCW

- my partner called this morning to ask them where it is

and apparently the account is on hold whilst they get information from provident.

 

We then called provident to find out what the original date of this debt was

- and the woman told me that there is literally no info regarding this debt on their systems

- she could put a request in for the paper work

but likely hood of this coming through is slim as it was all paper back then ? ( no sure what this means )

- she did tell us though that it was sold to BCW in 2012

- ( BCW then added a default to my partners CR)

 

What is the next step ?

would she write to provident or BCW to get this removed or would she SAR provident first ? -

 

 

when we look at her credit report it looks like no payment has ever been made on this debt with it being taken out in 2008

- so surely this would then be statute barred ?

 

 

would it not be easier to get the debt removed based on it being statute barred ?

 

 

or does that just removed the debt and the default but not the creditor ?

 

see attached screen shot of report

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually just noticed that BCW did not add the default it was provident as it was sold on in 2012 and default added in 2009 - so what would the next step be ?

The default date must always be the one the original creditor placed.

 

 

No agreement no pay. No contact until an agreement is supplied or it is confirmed one does not exist.

 

 

Stay Off The Phone, in writing only.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you BRIGADIER2JCS what would the next step be ?

Do nothing until an agreement is found or it is confirmed "unavailable".

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do nothing until an agreement is found or it is confirmed "unavailable".

 

Unfortunately this won't help the OP with a default against her name when the debt is not hers Brig.

 

You need to escalate this to the CRA's and the Data controller at BCW.

 

I would also start thinking about suing them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately this won't help the OP with a default against her name when the debt is not hers Brig.

 

You need to escalate this to the CRA's and the Data controller at BCW.

 

I would also start thinking about suing them.

 

 

Bit early for suing, not enough evidence gathered yet.

 

 

When the CCA request is rejected or is out of time a Letter Before Action to all concerned will I think achieve more jogs.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

STOP USING THAT PHONE!!

 

 

never ever phone a DCA or their fake/tame solicitors!

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

to whomever is chasing you for money

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok...

 

so we are sending a CCA request to both Provident and BCW - with the £1 fee and waiting 14 days for a response? if no response after 14 days - send a Letter before action with another 14 days ?

I would suggest 7 working days on the LBA.

 

 

The time scale for the CCA request is 12 + 2 WORKING DAYS ( discount weekend and B Hols.)

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello again

 

so the original "credit agreement " came through today - and has some interesting information -

1. the address on the credit agreement does not match the address on the default on the Credit report -

2. and the date the agreement was signed was in 2007 so a year before- the provident debt on the Credit report -

3. the debt on the agreement is also for £350 and according to exeprian the debt amount was for £950.

 

So we are very confused ?- the only thing I can think of somehow my partners report must have got mixed up with someone else's ?

does this happen ?

 

 

oh and signatures are totally different to my partners signature - but the same name, again just a reminder my partner came to the UK permanently in 2010.

 

what do I do next ? - I was thinking of sending them screen shots and telling them to removed the default within 14 days - or I will be suing ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again

 

so the original "credit agreement " came through today - and has some interesting information -

1. the address on the credit agreement does not match the address on the default on the Credit report -

2. and the date the agreement was signed was in 2007 so a year before- the provident debt on the Credit report -

3. the debt on the agreement is also for £350 and according to exeprian the debt amount was for £950.

 

So we are very confused ?- the only thing I can think of somehow my partners report must have got mixed up with someone else's ? does this happen ? oh and signatures are totally different to my partners signature - but the same name, again just a reminder my partner came to the UK permanently in 2010.

 

what do I do next ? - I was thinking of sending them screen shots and telling them to removed the default within 14 days - or I will be suing ?

 

 

Hi bumabear.

 

 

The document supplied can be rejected as incorrect.

 

 

Just write back (without any screenshots or other information) and state that the alleged agreement and the detail in it does not match the data you have on file and is therefore refuted and no liability for the alleged debt is acknowledged.

 

 

 

 

It's up to them to prove the liability for the debt and they have clearly failed.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Brig

 

In the letter I send them do we tell them to remove the default ? -

Hi let's wait to see what they come back with, hopefully it will be as wrong as this " agreement".

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi Jam_Buttie

 

We still have not had a response from them - its be a week over the the 14 days since my last letter - We have received another letter from BCW - urging the other half to call them urgently ( no date on the letter or anything) on teh advice of the above posters we haven't called either only in writing ( we're leaning lol)

 

I'm getting ready to send them a letter before action - just doing some more research as to what to put in it.

but literally not a peep from provident

 

hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...