Jump to content


MKDP LLP Claim for Morgan Stanley/Goldfish/Barclaycard


globalcitizen
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2339 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thereabouts but dont leave it till the deadline.....file it as soon as your ready then its done with.

 

Sure post your WS here and Ill give it the once over.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Andy,

Please let me know your thoughts! :) Thank you so much... I've just confirmed that they have paid the hearing fee. If they are to provide their documents 14 days before, am I able to see these documents?

Thank you..

 

Witness Statement of ****.

 

I am the defendant in the above case and appear before the court as a litigant in person.

 

1. Some time in 2006 I took out a credit card with Morgan Stanley. I have no original documentation relating to this account.

 

2. In 2008 my financial situation changed and I was unable to make repayments, which resulted in my defaulting on the debt. The date of which I am not aware.

 

3. I was contacted by Newman Debt Collection Agents and began to make agreed monthly payments towards the debt (Exhibit A).

 

4. In 2009 I was then contacted by Apex Credit Management LTD as the debt was taken over by Barclaycard and came to an agreed monthly instalment plan (Exhibit B) which I continued to honour until December 2010 when Apex were no longer looking after the debt and I was not informed of to whom the debt had been passed.

 

5. In June 2013 I received a letter from MK Rapid Recoveries (Exhibit C). I responded by post (Exhibit D) requesting proof of ownership of the debt but had no response to my letter. I then received two letters from Raven Recoveries (Exhibit E), responded via post but once again had no response.

 

6. I received a County Court Claim Form from MKDP LLP dated 29th August 2014. I submitted my acknowledgement of service on 5th September 2014. As a result of this claim I submitted my defence via MCOL on 29th September 2014.

 

7. As per my defence, on receipt of this claim, I sent a CCA 1974, Section 78 request to the Claimant dated 8th Seotember 2014. This was sent via recorded delivery and signed for on the 10th September 2014. The Claimant has yet to comply. Furthermore, on the 8th September 2014 I requested copies of the documents referred to in the Claimant's Particulars of Claim by way of a Civil Procedure Request 31, PD 14. This was also sent via recorded delivery and signed for on 10th September 2014. The Claimant has not responded to my request.

 

8. I received Notice of Small Claim Hearing dated 8th April 2015. I requested mediation via email (Exhibit F) and was informed I would be notified if the Claimant was also willing to mediate. No mediation has taken place.

 

9. The Claimant has failed to show how I have entered into an agreement with MKDP LLP (formerly Barclaycard). I have had no responses to my CPR31.14 and S78 CCA requests. S.127(3) of The Consumer Credit Act 1974 as amended by S.15 Consumer Credit Act 2006 provides that a court shall not make an enforcement order (i.e. a consumer credit or hire agreement will be automatically unenforceable) where: prescribed requirements in relation to the execution of regulated agreements (set out in section 61(a) of the 1974 Act) were not complied with or a document containing all the prescribed terms of the agreement was not signed by the debtor or hirer. To date MKDP LLP have not provided me with any documentation to prove their case against me.

 

10. In my defence I put the claimant to strict proof and requested that the court orders full disclosure. Despite my requests, I have never received appropriate documentation from the Claimant that would allow me to fully prepare my defence.

 

11. I argue that:

a. The Claimant has not provided an enforceable agreement.

b. I have never received a Notice of Assignment from Barclaycard to MKDP.

 

 

I believe that the facts shown in this statement of four pages are true.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes you will be served copies.... subject to what they disclose...and what you want to see......that's the whole principle of Standard Disclosure....simultaneous exchange.

 

With regards to your WS is good...just a few suggestions......

 

At 8 ...add " It is assumed that the claimant has declined to participate even though opting for on their Directions Questionnaire.

 

Remove point 11 or change to " If the claimant wishes to rely on documented evidence referred to within its particulars , they must file it at Court and serve copies on the defendant at least 14 days before trial as per the DJ XXXXXXXX Directions dated xx xxxx xxxxx.

 

 

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hello,

 

I thought I'd update on the situation. The hearing that was supposed to happen today has been adjourned to September because the Claimant has asked for additional time allowed to obtain additional documentation from a third party.

 

What's best for me to do now? Surely if they are making this claim, they should already have relevant documents needed. Do I sit and wait or is there something else I should do?

 

Thank you so much, any advice is greatly appreciated...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sit and wait...do some gardening or take a holiday...they will be running around frantically trying to gather/recreate the paperwork from the creditor.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...