Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

1st credit find recon CITI CCA after a year!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3522 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone

 

I received a letter today from 1st Credit in response to a request for a copy of my signed agreement.

 

 

I asked them for it a year or more ago (can't find the letter as it was on an old laptop)

 

They have sent a copy - no signature and no date which they say that they can do by law,

and are now demanding payment and that I contact them within 12 days.

 

I asked in my letter for a response within the statutory period (which i have seen as being 14, 30 days....either way not a year)

 

The debt with the original creditor defaulted, according to my credit file, November 2009,

therefore due to come off at the end of December this year.

 

 

This is a citi credit card debt that I had when I was married and have no recollection of the agreement etc.

 

 

I have not acknowledged the debt or made payment in the past 5 years 10 months.

 

Should they have written back sooner?

 

Why can't I have my agreement signed and dated?

 

IS this just a case of them seeing it's due to become 'expired' and trting it on?

 

Any advice welcome!

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Basically you're coming up to the 6 year SB (5 in Scotland) period... Hmmm How much is this for?

Id be tempted to ignore... 1st credit are the Reigate Retards... Wait for the 6 years date and then send them a Stat Barred Letter advising them its over 6 years old.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CITI card?

 

 

if its pre apr 2007 it wont wash

they need the signed agreement

and the correct T&C's for the right time.

 

 

like hens teeth those are for citi cards.

 

 

I hope you've CCA'd those other debts you are paying too I see

 

 

dx

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is no statutory period any more. That was repealed in 2008 I think.

 

They are allowed to provide a reconstruction in response to a CCA S77/78 request. That doesn't need a signature but it must be a true copy and contain all the specified terms of the original.

 

However, they must provide a copy of the signed original if they are to be able to enforce a judgement on an account that was started before April 2007.

 

When was your account started?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both.

 

I have no idea when the account was opened.

 

 

I am almost sure before April 2007 as I had it quite a while before the default

- which was November 2008 as referenced on my credit file.

 

But I am 3 house moves and a divorce away from the paperwork.

 

Should I write back referencing that or ignore them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

if all they have sent , is, basically, a blank 'look-a-like' CCA

then they can get that anywhere, even from here.

 

 

they'll know they have no chance

 

 

pers I'd let it run.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...