Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Caught shoplifting in IKEA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3524 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I did a really stupid thing and shoplifted some items from IKEA.

 

 

I was caught and the security guard, after checking my receipt, said that he would not call the police

and proceeded to issue me with a lifetime ban from all UK IKEA stores.

 

 

He told me that my picture (which was taken with the security camera in the questioning room)

would be posted to all the IKEAs and I would be recognised if I entered any IKEA stores in the UK.

 

This is my first offence and I was very lucky he did not call the police and I missed a criminal record (as this would have prevented me working),

but I still felt the consequence was very harsh.

 

 

I was made to sign the letter banning me and in it, it quotes that I am unable to access any UK IKEA governed space

(including carparks and grounds for ever).

 

I am so gutted and can not believe that I was so stupid as to try and steal such rubbish.

 

The problem is that I like IKEA and it is really useful for work things etc..

...I wondered if IKEA would recognise me if I entered another store?

 

 

Surely they would not have face-recognition cameras and surely their security guards would not be checking facial images

of every person that enters a store?

 

 

Do you think it would be safe to enter a store?

 

 

Or could I write to IKEA head office and ask if they could reconsider there ban as I have learnt my lesson?

 

Am I being crazy even considering this or being worried that I can no longer visit an IKEA store.

 

 

Should I just cut my losses and thank my lucky stars that it was not more serious consequence?

 

Please help me or share your experience if this has happened to you

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

theres no evidence that any uk stores/centre actually run that software.

 

 

quite honestly I'd not be worried

and just use the store as usual

 

 

all they'd do is ask you to leave under trespass laws anyway.

 

 

I'd be a bit more concerned [but NOT] about RLP

 

 

you'll prob get a series of threat-o-grams to pay anything upto £147.50

 

 

totally IGNORE them.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stay away from ikea for a few weeks and they won't remember you.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a "security" guard ban me from PC World - Still go in there from time to time and have yet to have the ban enforced.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think Ikea use RLP, or any other civil recovery operator.

 

I think you may be right. Having looked across the entire internet (NOT) I found a company called Kingdom who provide security for Ikea but they also use civil recovery within their company profile. Whether they actually do this is unclear as this is a first for me.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its legal but the costs and legalities involved make it very silly for a retailer to use it.

 

More often than not they tell the min wage security guys to tell the shoplifter that theyre being watched everywhere. Even though ots an outright lie.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you may be right. Having looked across the entire internet (NOT) I found a company called Kingdom who provide security for Ikea but they also use civil recovery within their company profile. Whether they actually do this is unclear as this is a first for me.

 

 

 

If it's the same Kingdom that also has some local authority contracts to provide dog poo polizei and litter wardens, I don't think they'd risk RLP-style tactics.

 

It's worth saying, I think, that in principle there's nothing wrong with a retailer seeking to recover their actual losses from a shoplifter, once convicted - it's the way RLP and others have gone about it that has brought it into disrepute, and probably made it much more difficult for legitimate claims to be brought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...