Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Illegal Contract Extension


barryjohn
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3528 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I had a two year contract with a car leasing company. The contract term was ended and a collection was confirmed. But the day before the collection, they informed me that, because of a missing payment, the collection was cancelled and the contract was put on an "informal extension". They also said I would be liable for the rental charges of the "extended" period.

It is true that the last month's payment didn't go through, but I was not aware of it and they didn't mention it at all even when I confirmed the collection date with them. I feel angry with their behaviour, in particular on the cancellation of the collection and the so-called "informal extension", so I refused to pay. Then they continued to bill me for the "extended" months and recorded a "Default" in my credit files.

I checked my contract with them, and there are no terms of the so-called "informal extension". I believe it is illegal to extend a contract without the agreement of the other party, so I plan to take them to the court. I wonder if anyone could advise which regulations and relevant terms are applicable to my case?

Many thanks in anticipation!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has the last payment been made now?

 

Has the car been collected?

 

Why do you need regulations? You had an agreement and they are the only terms you need. There will have been a provision for a missed payment i.e. they send a default letter and you pay up, or something similar. If it was an 'informal extension' then so be it. If it wasn't ask them what is going on and explain the provision laid down for a missed payment.

 

A

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, Alloyz1!

 

They collected the car six weeks later only after I warned them that I would report to the DVLA for an unattended vehicle. But they insisted that I pay the last month rental (missing one) plus those for the so-called "informal extension", and this is the total amount they recorded for the "Default" on my credit files. I haven't paid any of these.

 

I feel it can't be right like this, otherwise they can simply find a reason and dump a car with their customers and charge forever. Or I have been naive?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why do you need regulations? You had an agreement and they are the only terms you need. There will have been a provision for a missed payment i.e. they send a default letter and you pay up, or something similar. If it was an 'informal extension' then so be it. If it wasn't ask them what is going on and explain the provision laid down for a missed payment.

 

You just need to look at my statement above and it seems fairly straight forward

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, Alloyz1. I don't quite understand your post - please be patient with me.

 

They did send a default notice, but it was for ~£500 not the initial ~£200. Now it ended with a stand-off. They (1) recorded a "Default" on my credit files (at least with Experian, maybe with other credit agencies as well); and (2) demanded a payment of ~£500 instead of ~£200.

 

BTW, all the monthly payments were by Direct Debit. I don't how the last payment didn't go through.

 

Your advice is highly appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi barryjohn

 

Contact your bank, find out why the last Direct Debit didn't go through, it might be the company's fault.

 

Just because a contract has terms, doesn't mean it's fair.

 

http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/wales/consumer_w/consumer_protection_for_the_consumer_e/consumer_contracts_e/unfair_terms_in_consumer_contracts.htm

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, Alloyz1. I don't quite understand your post - please be patient with me.

 

They did send a default notice, but it was for ~£500 not the initial ~£200. Now it ended with a stand-off. They (1) recorded a "Default" on my credit files (at least with Experian, maybe with other credit agencies as well); and (2) demanded a payment of ~£500 instead of ~£200.

 

BTW, all the monthly payments were by Direct Debit. I don't how the last payment didn't go through.

 

Your advice is highly appreciated!

 

Hi BJ...

 

No problem, I wasn't being funny! Just trying to make it simple.

 

If there was an agreement, there should be a part of that agreement that covers default. Does that part mention anything about an 'informal extension'. Or should they have taken a different approach?

 

As Rebel rightly points out, once you establish what they should or shouldn't have done, you may want to then look at how fair the terms re default were.

 

Hope that helps

 

A

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to all of you - you are very kind!

 

There are no terms to support the so-called "informal extension" in the contract. There is indeed a clause on default, but ironically it states that they have the right to "terminate" the contract immediately instead of "extending" it.

 

I have already made a formal complaint to them and received a "final response" immediately from them on the same day.

 

Also, I made a complaint to the FOS. But in the telephone discussion, the (obviously inexperienced) adjudicator said she felt the leasing company had the right to extend the contract because I owed them money! She even asked me provide terms of regulations to justify why they couldn't do so?! Actually this was one of the reasons I came here to ask for help.

 

The FOS case is still on-going. But after reading many disappointing posts on this forum regarding the incompetence of FOS, I wonder if I should take legal action instead of wasting months of time with FOS?

 

Any advice would be highly appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the help, steampowered! I believe they are in breach of clause 10.1 in the T&Cs, but I copied the complete section on vehicle return just in case I have missed anything.

 

10 Return, Inspection and Condition of a Vehicle

10.1 Upon the expiration or on the termination of the Term or any Extended Term of the Schedule you must notify us when and where the Vehicle will be available for collection. Our collection agent will use its best endeavours to collect the Vehicle no later than the 3rd working day following the date on which we receive your notification that the Vehicle is available for collection.

10.2 If our collection agent attends to collect the Vehicle and for any reason the Vehicle is not available for collection at the time and place agreed Rentals will continue to be payable until the day prior to the date of agreed collection of the Vehicle by our collection agent and the Vehicle will remain at your risk until collection.

10.3 If, when our collection agent attends to collect the Vehicle, it is in their opinion and for any reason unroadworthy, we may charge you an abortive collection fee. We may also charge you any costs that we incur in

collecting the Vehicle. You must advise us in writing of any failure by our collection agent to collect the Vehicle at the agreed time. We reserve the right to continue to charge Rentals in the event of any such failure.

10.4 The Vehicle must be returned with the Road Fund Licence and if it is not then we reserve the right to recharge you for the value of the refund that would have been obtained for the unexpired Road Fund Licence. Any Road Fund Licence received by you after the Vehicle has been returned must be sent to us forthwith.

10.5 When we collect or otherwise take possession of the Vehicle it must be in a safe condition and in good and substantial repair (Fair Wear and Tear excepted, having regard only to its age and mileage).The Vehicle will be inspected by our collection agent at the time of collection. A Vehicle Collection Inspection Report will be completed by our collection agent on our behalf and you will be required to agree and sign the Vehicle Collection Inspection

Report. It is your responsibility to ensure that no personal effects are left in the Vehicle at the time of its collection.

10.6 Immediately upon our demand, you will pay to us a sum which equals:

10.6.1 the costs of repair or replacement of any part or parts or accessories where such repair or replacement is required as a result of any loss or damage to the Vehicle which in our opinion is in excess of Fair Wear and Tear, having regard only to the age and mileage of the Vehicle. We will only make a demand for payment where such costs exceed £150.00 (excluding VAT) or such other amount as we may from time to time notify to you in writing. Where the costs do exceed this amount, your obligations will be to pay the full costs (and not just the excess). If we decide for any reason not to undertake any such repair or replacement, we shall be entitled to claim from you, as damages for failure to keep the Vehicle in good repair and condition, a sum equivalent to the estimated cost of such

repair or replacement. Such claim shall be in addition to any other right which we may have against you for any breach by you of any of your obligations to us; and

10.6.2 where the Vehicle is not returned with a properly completed and stamped service book, or serviced by a non-approved agent the amount by which we reasonably consider the value of the Vehicle to have been adversely affected as a result of the lack of evidence that the Vehicle has been serviced in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations or an agent approved by us.

10.6.3 where the vehicle has been modified, painted or sign-written without our written permission at the start of the Agreement the full cost of rectification will be payable by you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to check whether the term has actually expired. What is the definition of 'Extended Term' in this contract?

 

 

If the term has expired, the wording in clause 10.1 that they must use 'best endeavours' in 10.1 is actually a very strong obligation in contract law and it seems to me that they will be in breach of that clause.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the reference in 10.1 to an Extended Term suggests that there's probably more to this than meets the eye. The OP will need to look very closely throughout the contract for any other references to an Extended Term to find out precisely what it is and when it comes into effect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for your help, steampowered! This is the full T&Cs they sent me when I signed the contract. BTW, there was a contract, but only with personal details, vehicle details, rates etc.

 

There is no definition of the so-called "informal extension" anywhere in their documents. But as I understand it is a common practice for vehicle leasing when a customer is unable to return the vehicle for some reasons - I myself did it before with other leasing companies. It is normally requested by the customer and agreed by both parties. But for this case they unilaterally put it on extension without my agreement.

 

I felt they were bullying me and I was very angry, so it ended with this situation. Perhaps I over-reacted, but I do feel it is an illegal practice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I should think they cannot charge you anything that's not in the contract (and even then signing to them does not mean an unfair or unlawful term can be enforced)

 

Just because they and other companies do this does not give it legality and enforceability. I can imagine a County Court judge would not be impressed with the company if in court they said "well your honour, no its not in our contract but everyone in the industry does it"

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just double check that the definition of 'Term' and 'Extended Term' is not clear from the front page of the document you signed.

 

Otherwise, it seems to me that you would have a good claim to sue them both for breaching clause 10.1 of their own terms. There is nothing in the T&Cs you provided which seems to allow them to extend the term of the contract.

 

I'm not sure you could challenge the default on your credit file though as you admit that the final payment was not made in time.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks to all of you! I think it is clear now - the claim will be that they are in breach Clause 10.1 and the 24 months contract term. So I will do:

 

1. to write a final letter to them for intended court action;

2. to file the claim at the Small Claims Court.

 

Have I missed anything?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The question in my mind is what kind of compensation will you be claiming and on what basis. What financial loss have you suffered as a result of their breach of contract?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this, steampowered! I was thinking about this myself actually. I don't have any measurable losses, but I have been rejected for credit applications (credit cards) - this was how I found they recorded a "default" on my credit file.

 

However, it is more about a fight of principle. How about I claim (1) the removal of the "default" from the credit file, and (2) a net compensation of £1 (after deducting the ~£200 I owed them)? Would the ~£201 claim be reasonable for a compensation of their bullying, illegal practice, breach of contracts, and cause for my inconvenience... ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with your wrongful default claim is that you admit your final payment was late and that you then refused to pay it. Unless I am missing something I'm not sure you can realistically claim for this.

 

 

When did they actually collect the car, in the end?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They collected the car six weeks later after I warned them that I would report to the DVLA for an unattended vehicle.

 

It is true I felt angry and refused to pay, but I am not sure if anyone would be happy to pay under this situation: they cancelled the collection, informed you the contract was in an "informal extension" and you were liable for costs in the extended period, only then they told you that the last payment didn't go through, and the default letter arrived several days later...

 

Are there any differences between default, missed payment, late payment etc? Sorry, I really don't have much knowledge about this.

 

Also the "default" amount they recorded on my credit file is much greater (~£500) than the payment missed (~£200). Can't I challenge that it is invalid?

Edited by barryjohn
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...