Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just to clear it up, sorry I don't make sense sometimes. I have paid £4000 £1200 of that was suppose to clear the £1200 debt.   Meaning I have sent a extra £2800 on top of my normal mainternance money.   Thank you
    • Try CPR 31.15 Possibly but a party is not compelled to disclose any documents pre allocation
    • Hi, I shown my key worker a letter that was sent to me saying that I owe £1200, she setup a standing order around 2021, this was to pay back money I owed, with my mental health status I have had complex issues to deal with and I just simply forgot about this standing order so it has been running for about 3.5 years acording to my key worker, anyway I'm not worried about the money that was sent that I call a overpayment, it went towards supporting my child's household so I am just happy with that, I am a little sad that I am being told I still owe this £1200, I have sent bank statements over 3 years worth but they have not taken away this £1200 bill and still say I owe it   Thank you
    • She did try contacting EON in the early days of the debt but they refused to speak to her because she could not pass the security checks. She didn't know the answers on an account she hadn't opened?   I also saw this article recently which could be what has happended here: Debt collection agencies in the UK are using fair means or foul to link people to an address where an unpaid debt has been run up, sometimes years after they have moved out The Guardian Anna Tims Mon 22 Apr 2024 The letter from the debt collection agency arrived out of the blue, and it was intimidating. It informed Joshua Simpson* that he owed £2,212 to Octopus Energy, and accused him of ignoring previous requests to settle the bill. If he did not stump up within 14 days, he was told, further action would be taken to recover the money. Simpson checked his Octopus account – it was in credit. Then he noticed the address where the debt had been accrued between 2022 and 2023. It was his childhood home – which his family had sold 18 years previously. "Since I was only 16 when we left the property, I was astonished that they'd linked my name [to it]," he says. "The debt collection agency insisted I provide a tenancy agreement to prove how long I've lived at my current address. I couldn't, since we bought our home. "They are now actively pursuing me for this debt, causing me a huge amount of stress. We are about to remortgage, and if this debt prevents us switching to a better deal, we will face real financial hardship." Simpson had been sucked into the shadowy world of "identity tracing", whereby investigators recruited by creditors seek to locate individuals who have moved home without paying their bills. It is an unregulated sector where anyone can set up as an agent in a back room without a licence, or scrutiny, and use fair means or foul to identify debtors. Reputable companies join a trade association that operates a code of practice, but membership is not mandatory, and mistakes are common. Last year, a teenage boy was chased for a debt of more than £900 by debt collectors acting for the energy company Ovo. A "trace agent" had somehow linked him to the debt because his parents had previously rented the property in question. An investigation by the Observer established that the debt had been run up by a subsequent tenant. The consequences of mistaken identity can be catastrophic. Individuals who are erroneously linked to a debt face, at worst, court action, bailiffs and a ruined credit rating. At best, they can endure weeks of stress and paperwork in order to prove they are not the debtor. It is estimated that 20m identity traces are made in the UK every year, many on behalf of companies that are owed money. Personal data is often obtained from credit reference agencies, which record applications for credit, and details are supposed to be verified with several different sources before being used for debt enforcement. In practice, however, this does not always happen. Simpson's details had been passed along a chain of intermediaries before the demand was issued. Octopus had given the unpaid account to a debt collection agent, which had contracted a tracing service, GBG, to find the debtor................ Full Article: https://www.theguardian.com/money/2023/oct/04/a-cry-for-help-energy-providers-play-the-villain-in-dramas-to-chill-the-blood ..............The Financial Ombudsman Service, which investigates complaints about financial firms, states that debt collection agents have to produce convincing evidence to link an individual to a debt, rather than rely on names, addresses and birth dates. According to the trade association, the Institute of Professional Investigators, an unknown number of investigators and trace agents are operating below the radar. Many more are merely inept, as data protection compliance training is not mandatory. "We have been campaigning for many, many years to try to get all private investigators regulated," says secretary general Glyn Evans.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Is it legal to send a DN just for cancelling a DD (all payments completed)


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2748 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

but you didn't specifically tell them to cancel the renewal

 

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

but you didn't specifically tell them to cancel the renewal

 

 

 

 

dx

 

They wrote and told ME it was cancelled after I stopped the direct debits… but not before they had raided my bank account for the Contents Insurance, and when I placed a block on them, because i knew they'd try to do the same with the Buildings Ins., they wrote and told me they had 'served' a default notice, (although I have yet to receive it)… TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

I certainly haven't signed anything for the renewal of 'contract', if that's what it amounts to…I don't see that they can accuse m of default… I don't owe them anything… or at least I didn't think I did, but they seem to be treating this as a loan… TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

well as long its got nowt to do with CAR insurance

whereby they can and do rollover if you don't cancel

 

 

no totally unlawful to auto roll contents or building without you agreeing.

 

 

go get 'em.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

well as long its got nowt to do with CAR insurance

whereby they can and do rollover if you don't cancel

 

 

no totally unlawful to auto roll contents or building without you agreeing.

 

 

go get 'em.

 

Out of interest where do the different legal authorities come from?

 

The contract you agree to for both (household and motor) will contain a provision for auto-renewal. Good practice dictates they refund your premium if you provide evidence that you are dual insured - have you explained you've had two lots of insurance accidentally? it's usually fairly straightforward to sort out

Link to post
Share on other sites

theres something about motor insurance that allows them to rollover

it doesnt extend to any other type.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the email they sent me after I stopped paying the direct debits…

 

Thank you for your email.

*

I can see from your file and from your email that you had cancelled the direct debits in order to stop the renewal from proceeding.

*

As you pay by monthly direct debits you entered into a loan agreement and as per terms and conditions of your policy payments cancelling the direct debits does not cancel the policy.

*

Instead it allows us to retrieve the missing payments or outstanding balance from your account.

*

I have cancelled the buildings and contents policies from today.

*

As it stands the £71.31 taken was the full yearly contents policy payment so far £22.84 of this has been refunded.

The buildings policy will still at this time have an outstanding balance of £101.17.

*

The underwriters will require proof that another insurance policy was taken in order to backdate your policies to receive any additional refund.

*

What do you think… can they make me pay, even though they have cancelled both policies? TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of interest where do the different legal authorities come from?

 

The contract you agree to for both (household and motor) will contain a provision for auto-renewal. Good practice dictates they refund your premium if you provide evidence that you are dual insured - have you explained you've had two lots of insurance accidentally? it's usually fairly straightforward to sort out

 

I was going to find a better quote after cancelling with the AA… but this business where they took the whole year's premium for the contents insurance has left me without the funds to go elsewhere… I don't have any savings and am on a low income… I'm worried that they will insist on taking the buildings premium as well.

 

I am currently uninsured and that's really worrying. I even agreed to continue with them until the end of the term if they will re instate my cover, but they have refused. TB

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
theres something about motor insurance that allows them to rollover

it doesnt extend to any other type.

 

 

dx

 

Hi again, DX... I've just received this...

I was wondering if, perhaps, I should get the FOS involved.

 

 

I have tried to resolve things by asking for them to reinstate my cover in return that I continue with the payments, but they have not agreed to this, it seems..

 

 

. they want the money but don't want to continue covering me..

. I can't afford to pay another insurer as well as them, so now I'm uninsured.

 

 

The other thing I don't understand is when they say Direct Debit payments are taken 59 days in arrears... I don't remember waiting a couple of months before starting payments... I just don't know what to do now... TB

 

Dear ThedaBara

 

The details of your concerns regarding your AA Home Insurance have been passed to me for review and response.

I understand you feel that you did not agree to the automatic renewal of your buildings and contents insurance and as a result, you are unhappy that we have debited payment from your bank account and have advised you that you still have an outstanding balance to pay.

 

Having investigated this matter,

I can see that you purchased the buildings and contents insurance online on 8 February 2014.

You agreed to the automatic renewal and instalment agreement during your online application process and selected to pay for the cover using our monthly instalment payment. Payment is collected 59 days in arrears when paying via monthly direct debit.

 

I confirm that renewal documents for both your buildings and contents insurance were issued to you on 11 January 2016, followed by a renewal confirmation letter on 3 February. In addition to this, on 5 February a copy of your AA Instalment Credit Agreement was issued to you advising you of the terms of the agreement.

 

It is important to note that you are required to contact our Insurance Department either by post, email or letter to request for your policy to be cancelled. Cancelling a direct debit mid-term is a breach of the AA Instalment Credit Agreement and will not result in the immediate cancellation of a policy.

 

Our system confirms that a default letter was sent to you dated 9 June in regards to your buildings insurance and on 15 June in regards to your contents insurance. The letter dated 15 June explained that in line with the terms of your instalment agreement, we would collect the full balance of £71.31 for your contents insurance on 5 July.

 

In view of my findings, I am confident that you were notified in advance of our intention to renew your insurance and that you had ample opportunity to contact us. I am therefore, unable to uphold your complaint although I do apologise for any disappointment caused.

 

The premium we have retained for your contents insurance is correct and in accordance with the terms and conditions based on the period of insurance provided to you. In addition to this, as payment is collected in arrears and because we did not claim the full balance for your buildings insurance, you do have an outstanding balance to pay to ensure you have paid for the period of cover provided. Please contact our Accounts Department on 0370 405 0003 to discuss this further.

 

To fulfil our regulatory requirement, I am obliged to inform you that I will close my file, however, if you would like me to address any additional matters, please let me know using the contact details provided. You have the right to refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service, free of charge. Although there are time limits for referring your complaint to the Ombudsman, we will consent to the Ombudsman considering your complaint even if you refer the complaint outside the time limits. Please refer to the below hyperlink for further details if required.

 

http://www.financial-ombudsman.org.uk/

 

While I appreciate that this may not be the answer you were looking for, I trust I have explained the AA' s position on the matter. Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to investigate your concerns and issue a response.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Rachel Minall

Special Investigations Executive

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes i'd escalate it.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hey good news

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
AT LAST!! This is the thread I've been searching for...

 

Relating to the legality of issuing default notices for cancelled DDs in relation to auto renewal of insurance...(It's the AA... surprose, surprise).

 

They have actually raided my bank account via my debit card and left me without the means to pay for essentials... I'm on a very low income... 6k a year. I can't afford to lose £70.

 

I believe the contract is for one year and that they should at least obtain a signature before they renew insurance for a further period of time... otherwise, they are saying they have an open ended contract... there is no such thing.:-x

 

OK... so it seems I should contact the CEO... I'll give it a go. & maybe fill in a form to the FCA as I know they are currently looking into this abuse of process...

 

Thanks! TB

 

Hello, we'd really like to help address this. Please email the details to [email protected] Reference FOR193973 including your full name, membership/policy number and contact details and we'll get this investigated as soon as possible. Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...