Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Cabot/Mortimer - claimform BOS Aqua card 'debt'***Claim Discontinued***


gavv8
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3086 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello.

 

I received a county court claim form from county court business centre dated 29/7/2014.

The particulars are:

By an agreement between bank of Scotland (aqua card)

("BOS") & the defendant on or around 27/04/2009

("the agreement")BOS agreed to issue the defendant with a credit card upon terms and conditions set out therein, in breach of the agreement the defendant failed to make the minimum payments and the agreement was terminated.

The agreement was assigned to the claimant on 18/03/2011

The claimant therefore claims 596.72.

 

The claim is from Cabot Financial through Mortimer Clarke solicitors and is for the above amount plus £120 court fee and costs.

 

I sent a CPR 31 request to Mortimer clarke on the 2/8/2014 and received a letter back stating that they were "taking instructions from their client and would get back to me asap", they also stated that they would agree to a 28 day extension.

 

I would like to make it plain that i have no idea where this debt has come from and have never owned any credit cards relating to 'BOS' despite having a Natwest account for over ten years, due to the actions of my first wife i have been unable to obtain mainstream credit for almost fifteen years now and although i have received letters from various organisations over the years regarding this 'aqua' card i gave up trying to explain to them that i had no knowledge of the debt several years ago.

 

I have registered with MCOL and acknowledged service online, but it now says that the case has 'had a bar put on it' and i can't respond or file defence at the moment.

 

Any advice as to how to proceed would be very helpful.

 

Thanks

Gavin.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Legal Forum.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

To add i have sent an SAR request to cabot this morning although I'm not sure if the court will look at it unfavorably if i don't agree to the 28 day extension thus not giving cabot time to respond, this may be ok based on the updated timeframe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gavv8

 

If you could read and complete the following posting your answers here...this will assist in the correct advice being offered.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-April-2014**(2-Viewing)-nbsp

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant ? Cabot financial (UK) limited

 

Date of issue – 29/07/2014

 

Date to acknowledge) = 16/08/2014

 

 

DAte to submit defence = 29/08/2014

 

What is the claim for –

 

1.By an agreement between Bank of Scotlandlink3.gif (aqua card) ("BOSlink3.gif") & the defendant on or around 27/04/2009 ("the agreement")BOS agreed to issue the defendant with a credit card upon terms and conditions set out therein,

2.in breach of the agreement the defendant failed to make the minimum payments and the agreement was terminated.

 

The agreement was assigned to the claimant on 18/03/2011

The claimant therefore claims £726 (£526 + £60 court fee + £60 costs)

 

What is the value of the claim?£596

 

Is the claim for a current or credit/loan account or mobile phone account?credit card

 

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? Allegedly after 2007

 

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned

and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. : Debt purchaser.

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No.

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? I can't honestly remember.

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year ? : No

 

Why did you cease payments:- I have never made any payments.

 

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? I have never dealt with the supposed original creditor.

 

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt managementlink3.gif plan? :No

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a letter from cabot today, reads :

 

Thank you for your letter dated 13 August 2014, the contents of which have been noted.

Unfortunately we are unable to locate the account from the information you have given in your letter.

Can you please provide either your Cabot reference number or, alternatively, the account number.

We have retained your cheque and look forward to hearing from you in due course once you can advise us of the correct account number.

Once this has been received we will process your CCA request accordingly.

 

Yours sincerely

 

Sue Pavel

Customer support consultant.

 

I provided them with the reference numbers stated on the court claim form.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hold on, htey have issued a claim against you, yet cant find the information ? How have they issued the claim ?

 

I am sure andyorch will be able to advise what you should be doing.

 

Was it the claim reference you gave them or the account reference ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just reading through the last few months of threads.. are Cabot firing these claims out with a blunderbuss or something??..

Should i reply to the last letter or just leave it and file my defence as it stands?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leave it and answer with a defence.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Does this read ok to file as defence?

 

Particulars of Claim

 

 

1.By an agreement between Bank of Scotland (aqua card)("BOS") & the defendant on or around 27/04/2009

("the agreement")BOS agreed to issue the defendant with a credit card upon terms and conditions set out therein,

 

2.In breach of the agreement the defendant failed to make the minimum payments and the agreement was terminated.

 

3.The agreement was assigned to the claimant on 18/03/2011

The claimant therefore claims £726 (£526 + £60 court fee + £60 costs)

 

 

Defence

 

1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.

 

2.Paragraph 1 is noted. I have no knowledge of any agreement between myself and Bank of Scotland regarding the Aqua credit card product

 

3.Paragraph 2 is denied. I have never held an agreement with BOSlink3.gif Aqua Cards to enable any breach let alone withhold any payments.

 

4.Paragraph 3 is denied I am unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served over 3 years ago.

 

5.It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of assignment/balance/breach requested by CPR 31. 14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to:

 

(a) show how the Defendant has entered into an agreement with the Claimant; and

(b) show how the Defendant has reached the amount claimed for; and

© show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim;

 

6.As per Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed.

 

7.On the alternative, if the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the Act 1974.

 

 

8.By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.

Edited by Andyorch
Particulars added for cross reference
Link to post
Share on other sites

Particulars added and paragraphed...you now need to respond to their point 2?

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats not really the answer to their point 2 gavv

 

They are saying that you breached the agreement and therefore failed to make any payments and the agreement was terminated.

 

Your response should be along the lines of Paragraph 2 is denied I have never held an agreement with BOS Aqua Cards to enable any breach let alone withhold any payments.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would email it using the appropriate address

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Letter received from mortimer clarke today, " we have received your defence, we are taking instructions in relation to your defence and will come back to you as soon as we can.. we will place the matter on hold until we hear further from it".

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...