Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The move marks the first time the country's central bank has raised interest rates for 17 years.View the full article
    • The firm has benefited from the AI boom, making it the third-most valuable company in the US.View the full article
    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Appeal for help with tenant deposit issues please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3484 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear Members

I am an incidental landlord having lost my job and forced to relocate to an alternative location for a job. Unfortunately, I foolishly and naively did not do adequate research when renting out my house to a neighbour's close relative. As a result, I did not protect the tenant's deposit - I provide a chronology below. A catastrophic falling out, followed by non-payment of rent forced me to seek repossession under S21.

I successfully obtained an Eviction Order as a direct outcome from the help I got from you!

 

I would be grateful for your thoughts, views and suggestions.

 

The matter I have set out below is a result of my own naivety and foolishness having not done my research properly as an amateur and accidental landlord:

 

Issues
:-

 

(i) Is the former tenant right in asking for the return of the deposit even though it was paid by a party unrelated to the contract over a year before the commencement of the tenancy agreement in question?

(ii) Are there certain legal arguments that might be of material relevance to my dispute with the tenant – for or against/

 

Facts of matter / chronology

 

I became an accidental landlord when I lost my, and I was forced to leave the 3 - bedroomed home and relocate to a new job some four hours’ drive away. I put my house up for renting.

 

My neighbour’s two granddaughters took up tenancy (AST) in my house consecutively following heart felt pleas from my neighbour of 15 – years.

 

(i) The first granddaughter (A) was aged 17 and a teenage mother. Her parents were guarantors and provided the surety / deposit on 29/08/11. I did not protect the deposit purely out of ignorance and foolishness on my part. I did not do my research well.

(ii) The neighbour approached me again in 2012; saying that ‘A’ had turned 18 was now ready to move out to smaller accommodation.

(iii) The neighbour asked me if I would be agreeable to an arrangement where another granddaughter (B) and her family would move into the house as a straight swap between the two cousins (A and B). There was an unspoken and unwritten assumption that ‘A’s deposit would be rolled over to the second B’s tenancy.

(iv) The house swap between A and B happened in October 2012 when B’s family took occupancy of my house. I never communicated with ‘A’ and ‘B’ directly – but always through their grandmother, my neighbour.

(v) However, around July 2013, B contacted me directly and asked me to allow her mother to move in with her for 3-months; this was my first direct contact with the tenant.

(vi) In August, the tenants (B) asked to agree to having cavity wall insulation installed using their state benefit status in return for a reduction in rent, I refused and relations pretty much soared bitterly thereafter following rude e-mails from B.

(vii) Some 4 – months after the end of the initial 6-month contractual period, B brought up the ‘deposit scheme’ issue saying that this had not been deposited within the 30-day window. I asked ‘B’ to confirm in writing that they had paid ‘A’ her deposit which they did. I immediately protected the deposit and served the prescribed information on ‘B’ but they refused to counter sign the deposit scheme certificate.

(viii) I served a Section 21 Notice to quit which went undefended, leading to the issue of an Eviction Order.

(ix) The tenants eventually abandoned the property, leaving a trail of damage and destruction and £1830 in unpaid rent. They left bulky items and abandoned furniture items.

(x) The tenants are now seeking redress for unprotected deposit and have issued a letter before action demanding £575

 

If I were to send a cheque for the asked for money 'in full and final settlement' - does Members please advise me on any further wording I might need to add to the cover letter in order to protect myslef?

 

I thank you in advance.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Mak6

 

f16 is correct this may be better in the Residential Lettings area so I will move your thread to there and leave a short redirect so you know where your thread is.

 

Its administrative so nothing for you to do.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Could you clarify the following:

 

1. So (B) move in on October 2012 was there a written AST?

 

2. Are (B) parents named as Guarantors?

 

3. Is (B) Deposit protected in a TDS and if so have you checked (B) hasn't claimed deposit back from the scheme?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Stu007 for taking the trouble to read my post.

 

1. Yes, there was an AST for 'B';

2. 'B's parents are not named on the AST, only 'A's parents who paid the surety which is assumed to have rolled over into 'B's contract.

3. 'B's deposit was deposited into a scheme long after the their AST commenced but within days after they finally confirmed that they had paid 'A's parents the £575 (which they had paid at the beginning of 'A's contract (NB was 17 - years old at time of signing AST; I foolishly didn't protect her deposit through lack of proper research on my part).

 

I hope I've shed light on your queries Stu007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you confirm that you protected the Deposit in a TDS before you issued the S21 notice?

 

Have you informed the TDS of the dispute?

 

How long has it been since the eviction date? (remember you have a set amount of days in which to return a deposit at the end of tenancy and if their is a dispute to contact the relevant TDS and place it in dispute)

 

I assume from what you have written there may not have been a check in/check out inventory taken and photographs of the properties condition on move in/out which could make claiming some of the damages difficult.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should you not be considering also how to deal with their debt to you. If the deposit is £575 then you are potentially looking at returning £575 to them plus a £575 "fine" (it could be up to 3 times £575, but hopefully the judge will fine the minimum in this case).

 

You would then need to pursue them for the rent short-fall and/or damage etc.? Do you intend to do this.

 

If so, do you have adequate evidence, and a reasonable chance of getting your money back?

 

And get cavity wall insulation yourself! It's not that expensive and you save a lot on your bills.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought this OP sounded familiar -

http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?63307-Appeal-for-help-with-tenant-deposit-issues-please

 

 

Tenant A (deposit not protected) has a case against you for non-protection for return of deposit and 1-3 x compensation in next 6 yrs, even though it was later used & protected for different, though related tenant.

Return deposit amount, as cheque payable to T A's parents, get a dated receipt, or they can hand it back to you for T B's deposit

.

Just hope T A does not realise she could make some easy money from your oversight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

first point, as T A was under 18 she cannot sign and be held liable for a contract! so probably ok there, depending on Judge though if anything comes of that.

S21 not valid if deposit not protected, so you would have had to give them that back to get court action for eviction.

Suggest you consider taking them to court, or at least send LBA ,for unpaid rent and damage and see how they respond; keep deposit at the moment or offset it against your claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all - Stu007; Steve_M; Mariner51; Raydetuni: Just to touch on some queries for clarification starting with Stu007's queries:-

(1) I protected the deposit into a TDS scheme before service of a S21 Notice and Repossession Order was issued on that basis; (2) I have not informed the TDS of the dispute as the tenants have since left and made no representations as regards the deposit; (3) The tenant eventually abandoned the property so the exact date of departure is unknown but the Repossession Order stipulated 26 February 2014 as the eviction date. (4) You are right, there was no check in / check out inventory (all based on friendly neighbourly fashion, a huge mistake on my part. I have cut my losses on the inventory aspect.

 

Steve_M:- I intend to counterclaim for the rent arrears. I have evidence of non payment of rent as the tenants cleared stated so in various e-mails. As regards realistic prospects for getting the money back, it doesn't look likely because, since the tenant's departure - there have been three bailiffs looking for the former tenants.

 

Cavity wall is already in place.

 

Mariner51 - "...Return deposit amount, as cheque payable to T A's parents, get a dated receipt, or they can hand it back to you for T B's deposit

..." Thank you for this - especially in the absence of any confirmation that ex-tenants ('B') paid ex-tenant's ('A's) parents to allow roll-over of deposit. So yes, I will send a cheque to 'A's parents first thing tomorrow and see how things go. On that note Mariner51, does the fact that 'A' was aged 17 play a part in terms of signing a contract? A's parents were the gurantors, does that follow that my contract was with them although they did not live in the rented house. Where does this leave tenants 'B' who are now claiming that the deposit was theirs? Raydetinu alludes to this point below.

 

- Does the fact that the Court issued a possession Order based on the Section 21 Notice destroy the tenants' argument that their deposit was not protected within the requisite 30 - days?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Raydetinu. Just for clarification, the deposit was protected before the S21 Notice but well after the 3-day period had lapsed. The Repossession Order was issued as a result. Tenants' 'B's argument is that the deposit was not protected within the 30-day window - although they never provided me with notification that they had in turn, paid tenant (a cousin of theirs) the deposit which they are now claiming that it was theirs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My#10 was written before I read subsequent posts, and am even more confused now!

Were the 2 g'dau Ts siblings, ie same parents?

I don't see how B's family can be Ts unless named on orig AST, but you say mother moved in 3 months after B, at Bs request. Did you add them to AST then?

As B confirms they repaid £575 deposit to A and you imm protected A's deposit in B's name, then don't repay deposit to A, though she still can bring claim for non-protection. B appears not to have such claim as you protected the deposit for B's Tenancy as soon as repayment was confirmed. Would have been diff if A & B had been joint Ts orig.IMO.

 

 

Whilst a 17 yo cannot sign a legally binding Contract, many Judges disregard this for ASTs signed by 17 yo, esp if person felt they could no longer live at home and you took pity on a pregnant girl.

 

 

There are no incidental or accidental LLs in the Letting business, only inexperienced ones and you have made some classic mistakes, with the best of intentions I am sure, but they could cost you dear,

Since we cannot read the ASTs etc, I suggest you contact a rep local Solicitor who specialises in LL & T Law for more advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Thank you very much Mariner51 and I am sorry for the delayed expression of gratitude which has been due to a family bereavement.

 

I have now paid the money to A's parents who were her Guarantors (as she was 17 at the time) - they have since banked the cheque. I now await B to execute their threat for taking me to Court for non-protection of deposit which presumably they never paid, assuming that A's parents' acceptance of the money which they had paid on behalf of their daughter had never been paid back to them by tenants B (as claimed by B earlier).

 

If there are any further developments and I need help, I'll certainly get back to you Mariner51. Thank you for your time and comments once again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...