Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • get rid of the car and sue under a scottish claim for transportation costs.
    • nothing new always been that way for 25+yrs now i had voip lines with NTL back in the late 90's which is why a real trucall box or a handset with real truecall software in it is SO good.   on average i get about 25-35 of these calls a month NONE get thru  the ones that spoof UK or mobile numbers are still screened are easily dealt with the truecall system   if they are real, the only thing they have to do is speak and you get an alert ring to listen to whom call with the option to accept or ZZapp them. once zapped that number never gets thru again.   its worthy to note that the scammers only ever use disconnected numbers, or fake numbers after a known local UK dialling code well the truecall software already knows these numbers as it gets the same databases the scammers use. if the number doesnt come up on the fake/disconnected list, it also then checks if the UK number is listed active UK and will auto put people thru   very clever little device worth every penny and mine is from 2006 when i joined CAG.
    • No the info on comms log isn't quite right,   I hadn't worked since Xmas due to bereavement but I wasn't staying in Somerset since the Xmas. The comms log is very deceitful indeed and after I had finished evaluating it fully I came to the conclusion MB are very manipulative, they lie, cheat and twist the truth, but it only takes the slightest slip up and everything crumbles.   You see in order for MB to have taken any further steps they have to be entitled to take them. So when they lie and try to deceive the truth prevails 😊, so to send a copy of a Default Sums Notice dated 15/1/17 that doesn't exist on the log anywhere and Ive never had the original and then fail to include one in the SAR that is listed on the log as generated on 18/1/17 (not had this one either)  doesn't the consequence of that 1 act prevent them from any further action until the notices are served    86 (e) Notice of default sums (5)If the creditor or owner fails to give the debtor or hirer the notice under this section within the period mentioned in subsection (2), he shall not be entitled to enforce the agreement until the notice is given to the debtor or hirer.       But I am reducing the complaint and sticking to basics
    • keep to recent threads/ifo.   things have changed since the new Conc rules replaced the old rubbish a debt owner must either put up or shut up did you not read the SB letter yourself?      
    • cnt see any indication of what the devil the IVa company were upto in court just because the IVA failed. i can see it was done thru PayPlan, bit it wouldn't have been payplan that did it some fleecing mob like Harrington Brooks or alike.  
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 4 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

Very old CCJ, multiple DCA!


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2236 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I had a CCJ taken out against me in 1998 for for a bank loan I took out in 1996.The order was for £10 a month which I have been paying ever since.

Since then, the debt has been sold on to 8, 9 or even 10 DCA's, so many I can't accurately recall.

 

The last time the debt was sold on, the DCA contacted me for payment, at which point I notified them that there was a CCJ in place that was being abided by.

Having to explain this to so many DCA's was becoming annoying so I asked why the relevant information wasn't being passed from one DCA to another, since that's their responsibility.

I also enquired as to what information the DCA did possess with regards to the debt, and this turned out to be very little.

 

At this point I started to question what proof the DCA could provide that it was entitled to collect the debt and also questioned (since there was very little in terms of a paper trail) the amount I actually owed, no copy of the CCJ was ever passed on and no Notice of Assignment was ever issued to me when passing from one DCA to another.

 

The debt has now been sold again but to another company that the current DCA is also a part of, this time with a Notice of Assignment, of course.

 

Now, considering the claimant on the CCJ was a different entity entirely and the DCA has very little in the way of accurate information

with regards to the debt and with no previous Notice of Assignment being issued,

 

1. Is it still able to legally persue this debt (not being the claimant on the original CCJ)?

 

2. Does a recent Notice of Assignment mean anything if none were previously given?

 

3. Am I entitled to proof that the DCA does have the legal right to collect this money (i.e. Notice of Assignment for each time the debt was sold on)?

 

4. Am I entitled to proof of how much I still owe (more than just a letter from the new DCA, i.e. statements of payments I've made dating back to the first payment I made under the CCJ)?

 

I accept the debt needs to be paid, but how do I know it is the DCA I should be paying and how confident can I be in the outstanding amount,

if they have very little evidence of ownership or previous payments made (my neighbour could say they bought the debt, how would I know I should or shouldn't pay them)?

 

ty

 

(Also posted on MSE)

Edited by aircoreboy
Link to post
Share on other sites

you ask them for a copy of the CCJ

 

and a full set of statements for what you have paid

 

as you believe the debt has been settled long ago now.

 

if they persist, then simply tell them they are not the named claimant and you will only ever pay them.

 

sorry sounds like you've been had badly here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

pers I wouldn't give them the pleasure of you thinking they have any power like

an sar does toward a creditor/debtor relationship might imply.

nor £10

 

if they think you owe them money YOU ASK THEM TO PROVE IT.

 

by the above post

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

how much was the original ccj for. Do u have the original paperwork. If so consult that or even if u have ref number contact the OC or courts.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the OC would not have been the claimant

 

and the courts will have no records I bet after all this time.

 

classic cash cow case sadly

 

I bet lots of the balance were PENALTY charges & PPI too

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I ment the OC as in the one on the claim form not original creditor.

 

more than likely re the courts but it would be a very long shot

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The original CCJ was for just over £4200.

 

I no longer have the paperwork with regards to the loan, but do have the original CCJ.

 

The original creditor and plaintiff on the CCJ was the Halifax, the current DCA is Apex Credit Management, acting on behalf of Cabot Credit Management Group.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My advice would be to add up all payments made take that from the money owed and then tell the new chaaer that they can bugger off as u have a ccj that is to be paid to xx and as result based om the court info xx has been paid and xx is due to the courts

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I ment the OC as in the one on the claim form not original creditor.

 

more than likely re the courts but it would be a very long shot

 

then that's not the original creditor its the claimant.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
The original CCJ was for just over £4200.

 

I no longer have the paperwork with regards to the loan, but do have the original CCJ.

 

The original creditor and plaintiff on the CCJ was the Halifax, the current DCA is Apex Credit Management, acting on behalf of Cabot Credit Management Group.

 

who was the sols, haliprats don't do court themselves

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

doing a bit of research here and around

for the era of the ccj, they were doing cases for hbos.

 

i'd be writing as post 2.

 

just remember the current 'buyer'

[though I bet you've never received official NOA's]

 

doesn't know what you paid in the past.

 

so for all they know you could have been paying more than £10PCM.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

 

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

 

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

 

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
doing a bit of research here and around

for the era of the ccj, they were doing cases for hbos.

 

i'd be writing as post 2.

 

just remember the current 'buyer'

[though I bet you've never received official NOA's]

 

doesn't know what you paid in the past.

 

so for all they know you could have been paying more than £10PCM.

 

dx

 

Thanks dx, will be sending that off today!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...