Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • you could ahve got 5 hours of LiP research as part of an unreasonable behaviours costs claim. slapping in a vrbal request for 10 hours was bound to fail I'm afraid. Note to all others rweading this post, you take a letter with you with all of your costs laid out in it and submit it  to court when you beat off the claim. the judge has discretion on whetehr to award a bean or a million quid but if you dotn have anything on paper you get you bus fare at best
    • I would have sent it to the eviction team as they are the ones threatening you.................  guess you'll just have to wait and see if complaints pass it on.   You could always email a copy to the eviction team if you have their email add.
    • Hey all done a lot of forum searching etc and im trying to get all my documents in order to send off the n244 set aside ccj form,.  So far.....i have done the below but feel like im not doing it right?   In the County Court at Stockport Claim No:    LOWELL SOLICITORS Claimant And   MR  Defendant   Witness statement 1.    I understand that the Claimant obtained a Default Judgement against me as the Defendant in JUNE 2019. However, this claim form has not been served at my current address and I thus was not aware of the Default Judgement until September 2019 when I was doing a routine check on my credit file. I understand that this Claim was served at an old address 15 Armadale Close. However, I moved to a new address in September 2011 and I moved from 15 Armadale close in 2008. In support of this I can provide confirmation from Stockport County Council showing my updated details for the purposes of paying Council tax. 2.    I requested a sar from Lowell solicitors which shows them contacting me at my current address and not needing to contact an address where I never took credit or moved form 11 years ago. 3.     It is denied that the Defendant owes the Claimant £3154.09 as stated in their particulars of on the 15/05/2019 4.    I have never received agreement & default notice from Lowell solicitors ltd. 5.     On the 12/11/2019 I sent a formal request for a copy of the original agreement to Lowell Suitors pursuant to section 77 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 along with the statutory £1 fee. 6.    I request the court orders the Claimants to provide the necessary documentation for me to fully plead my case else the Claim should stand struck out. 7.    In the event that the relevant documents are received from the Claimants I will then be in a position to amend my defence and would ask that the Claimants bear the costs of the amendment. Statement of Truth The contents of my statement are true to the best of my knowledge and belief Signed:  Dated: 12/11/2019     also     IN THE STOCKPORT COUNTY COURT Claim No. F1HK1E62 BETWEEN: LOWELL SOLICITORS Claimant – and – Defendant   _________________________________ DRAFT ORDER _________________________________   Upon reading the defendant’s application dated 15th May 2019 It is ordered that: 1. The judgment dated 18/06/2019 be set aside. 2. The Defendant has filed a witness statement enclosed with application 3. The Claimant do pay the Defendant’s costs of this application to the sum of £255 4. The Claimant has permission to file and serve a reply if so required.          
    • Have a look at FOS on trustpillooot someone has just made a nice post about 4 hours ago:)
    • I believe they said they have ceased trading but the company itself is still active. I contacted companies House and also the insolvency register. I believe they have lied to get us off their tracks. Emc were previously Surrey First Cars. I have been doing a lot of investigating lately. I also know as of 9th October a new company has been registered for car sales at the EMC premises. However, as I mentioned chobham motors is still trading which is owned by Crown motor.    Edit- just found my agreement with wmsgroup for third party insurance. The dealer name on it actually says EMC CAR SALES/COBHAM CENTRAL GARAGE   
  • Our picks

2REAL2RYAN

online retailer refusing return - need advice ***Resolved***

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1911 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi Brigs

 

Trade / wholesale websites don't allow access to members of the public, you have to register with them, they carry out checks etc. This for some reason wasn't applicable to the OP. As you know terms and conditions can be unfair.

 

Hi Rebel,

I (as added to post23) have taken a look at these "trade only"/ "wholesale" sites, one only has to "click on" the Ts & Cs/ returns policies sections to see that returns are restricted to "faulty" goods.

Also in the preamble/ intro to the site the words Trade Only and Wholesale are mentioned and more often than no highlighted.


Welcome to Consumer Action Group

 

'Challenges are what makes life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.'

Joshua J. Marine

 

1) CLAIM BACK ALL PENALTY CHARGES CLICK HERE

2) CLAIM BACK ALL MIS-SOLD PPI CLICK HERE

3) COMPOUNDED CONTRACTUAL INTEREST CLICK HERE

4) REQUEST CCA FROM CREDITOR CLICK HERE

5) OFT- UNENFORCEABLE AGREEMENTS CLICK HERE

6) CAREY V HSBC (2009) CLICK HERE

7) DON'T BE BULLIED BY CREDITORS / DCA's CLICK HERE

8) IN DEBT DON'T PANIC CLICK HERE

9) FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT CLICK HERE

10) SALE OF GOODS ACT-EDUCATE YOUR RETAILER CLICK HERE

11) DISTANCE SELLING-EDUCATE YOR RETAILERCLICK HERE

12) SOGA SUMMARY CLICK HERE

13) WHICH? TEMPLATES [/url]CLICK HERE

14) DOES YOU BANK TREAT YOU FAIRLY BCOBSCLICK HERE

15) EVERYTHING HOUSING CLICK HERE

16) UTILITY BACKBILLING CLICK HERE

17) OFGEM - COMPLAINTSCLICK HERE

18) OFCOM - COMPLAINTS CLICK HERE

DON'T GIVE UP, THIS SITE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH GUIDANCE AND EMPOWERMENT

 

Don't forget to donate to this site

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Brigs

 

Trade / wholesale websites don't allow access to members of the public, you have to register with them, they carry out checks etc. This for some reason wasn't applicable to the OP. As you know terms and conditions can be unfair.

 

 

Hi Reb,

 

 

Most of these will allow Non Trade Purchases (tested this in the past) but the same Ts & Cs apply as to trade customers.

IMO unless the OP asks for a gesture of goodwill this will go nowhere.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Brigs

Trade / wholesale websites don't allow access to members of the public, you have to register with them, they carry out checks etc. This for some reason wasn't applicable to the OP. As you know terms and conditions can be unfair.

 

 

Yeah I can confirm they failed to undergoe checks on me.

 

This is getting so complicated especially if they argue they are trade only, could be quite hard using SOGA and the Consumers Contract Regulations, but I will still refer to it as it would be my only hope in getting these cowboys to comply with my return request.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Reb,

Most of these will allow Non Trade Purchases (tested this in the past) but the same Ts & Cs apply as to trade customers.

IMO unless the OP asks for a gesture of goodwill this will go nowhere.

 

Tomorrow I will let you guys know what they say, even if they refuse again I will keep going to the end, I ain't giving up just yet!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah I can confirm they failed to undergoe checks on me.

 

This is getting so complicated especially if they argue they are trade only, could be quite hard using SOGA and the Consumers Contract Regulations, but I will still refer to it as it would be my only hope in getting these cowboys to comply with my return request.

I can't agree with calling them cowboys, one must especially when buying on line check Ts & Cs and trading policies or take the consequences of not doing so.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't agree with calling them cowboys, one must especially when buying on line check Ts & Cs and trading policies or take the consequences of not doing so.

 

Yeah it would have been so much work and money for the company to put the words "NO RETURNS" on their homepage...I'm guessing you are probably one of their loyal employees haha.

 

At the end of the day, any company that replies to my emails in a rude/unhelpful manner and that notifies me about their NO RETURNS policy post-purchase via email is in my opinion a retail cowboy.

 

And yes I think I have learnt that in the future I need to check the T&C's since some online retailers like to be less vocal about their NO RETURNS policy...and like that's a coincidence lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A site can have all sorts of T & C's posted on their website, it doesn't make the T & C's fair or legal.

 

A classic example is Virgin Media, if you move somewhere where there is no Virgin Media coverage, they still expect you to pay the remaining months of the contract although you still want the product, but there is no coverage whatsoever. This is in their T & C's.

 

How fair is that?

 

I can't agree with calling them cowboys, one must especially when buying on line check Ts & Cs and trading policies or take the consequences of not doing so.

Welcome to Consumer Action Group

 

'Challenges are what makes life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.'

Joshua J. Marine

 

1) CLAIM BACK ALL PENALTY CHARGES CLICK HERE

2) CLAIM BACK ALL MIS-SOLD PPI CLICK HERE

3) COMPOUNDED CONTRACTUAL INTEREST CLICK HERE

4) REQUEST CCA FROM CREDITOR CLICK HERE

5) OFT- UNENFORCEABLE AGREEMENTS CLICK HERE

6) CAREY V HSBC (2009) CLICK HERE

7) DON'T BE BULLIED BY CREDITORS / DCA's CLICK HERE

8) IN DEBT DON'T PANIC CLICK HERE

9) FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT CLICK HERE

10) SALE OF GOODS ACT-EDUCATE YOUR RETAILER CLICK HERE

11) DISTANCE SELLING-EDUCATE YOR RETAILERCLICK HERE

12) SOGA SUMMARY CLICK HERE

13) WHICH? TEMPLATES [/url]CLICK HERE

14) DOES YOU BANK TREAT YOU FAIRLY BCOBSCLICK HERE

15) EVERYTHING HOUSING CLICK HERE

16) UTILITY BACKBILLING CLICK HERE

17) OFGEM - COMPLAINTSCLICK HERE

18) OFCOM - COMPLAINTS CLICK HERE

DON'T GIVE UP, THIS SITE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH GUIDANCE AND EMPOWERMENT

 

Don't forget to donate to this site

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah it would have been so much work and money for the company to put the words "NO RETURNS" on their homepage...I'm guessing you are probably one of their loyal employees haha.

 

 

NOT TRUE AND NOT FUNNY!!

 

At the end of the day, any company that replies to my emails in a rude/unhelpful manner and that notifies me about their NO RETURNS policy post-purchase via email is in my opinion a retail cowboy.

 

And yes I think I have learnt that in the future I need to check the T&C's since some online****** retailers**** like to be less vocal about their NO RETURNS policy...and like that's a coincidence lol.

 

 

When offering advice here one tries to see the logic of both sides of a problem.

 

 

You refer again to "retailers" the site you used appears to clearly " trade only/wholesale" not retail.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A site can have all sorts of T & C's posted on their website, it doesn't make the T & C's fair or legal.

 

A classic example is Virgin Media, if you move somewhere where there is no Virgin Media coverage, they still expect you to pay the remaining months of the contract although you still want the product.

Hi reb,

 

 

The talk here is all about an "online retailer" looking at these sites again a few minutes ago all state " Trade Only"/" Wholesale"

But Not "retail".

If one wishes to take advantage of trade/wholesale prices offered by these dealers then their terms will still apply.

The titles of the sites make their status quite clear, obviously I cannot post links to such sites as they would be removed but they are there for all to see on the net.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When offering advice here one tries to see the logic of both sides of a problem.

 

 

You refer again to "retailers" the site you used appears to clearly " trade only/wholesale" not retail.

 

I appreciate hearing both sides honestly, I just find it depressing that an online company can't even have the goodwill to accept the return of 1 item LOL.

Even when I have offered to pay a handling fee and delivery charges.

 

what's this world coming to...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't find anything that states Trade/Wholesale are an exception to consumer rights, he's not a trader buying in bulk.

 

The other thing is that Trade/Wholesale invoice, the OP's transaction was carried out immediately because he's not a Trader.

 

Lets see what delevlops, he has other options.

 

Let's see how we get on.

 

Hi reb,

 

 

The talk here is all about an "online retailer" looking at these sites again a few minutes ago all state " Trade Only"/" Wholesale"

But Not "retail".

If one wishes to take advantage of trade/wholesale prices offered by these dealers then their terms will still apply.

The titles of the sites make their status quite clear, obviously I cannot post links to such sites as they would be removed but they are there for all to see on the net.


Welcome to Consumer Action Group

 

'Challenges are what makes life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.'

Joshua J. Marine

 

1) CLAIM BACK ALL PENALTY CHARGES CLICK HERE

2) CLAIM BACK ALL MIS-SOLD PPI CLICK HERE

3) COMPOUNDED CONTRACTUAL INTEREST CLICK HERE

4) REQUEST CCA FROM CREDITOR CLICK HERE

5) OFT- UNENFORCEABLE AGREEMENTS CLICK HERE

6) CAREY V HSBC (2009) CLICK HERE

7) DON'T BE BULLIED BY CREDITORS / DCA's CLICK HERE

8) IN DEBT DON'T PANIC CLICK HERE

9) FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT CLICK HERE

10) SALE OF GOODS ACT-EDUCATE YOUR RETAILER CLICK HERE

11) DISTANCE SELLING-EDUCATE YOR RETAILERCLICK HERE

12) SOGA SUMMARY CLICK HERE

13) WHICH? TEMPLATES [/url]CLICK HERE

14) DOES YOU BANK TREAT YOU FAIRLY BCOBSCLICK HERE

15) EVERYTHING HOUSING CLICK HERE

16) UTILITY BACKBILLING CLICK HERE

17) OFGEM - COMPLAINTSCLICK HERE

18) OFCOM - COMPLAINTS CLICK HERE

DON'T GIVE UP, THIS SITE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH GUIDANCE AND EMPOWERMENT

 

Don't forget to donate to this site

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I appreciate hearing both sides honestly, I just find it depressing that an online company can't even have the goodwill to accept the return of 1 item LOL.

Even when I have offered to pay an admin fee and delivery charges.

 

what's this world coming to...

 

 

It's come to it, gone past it and is getting worse!


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time for a 60's revival:-)

 

It's come to it, gone past it and is getting worse!

Welcome to Consumer Action Group

 

'Challenges are what makes life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.'

Joshua J. Marine

 

1) CLAIM BACK ALL PENALTY CHARGES CLICK HERE

2) CLAIM BACK ALL MIS-SOLD PPI CLICK HERE

3) COMPOUNDED CONTRACTUAL INTEREST CLICK HERE

4) REQUEST CCA FROM CREDITOR CLICK HERE

5) OFT- UNENFORCEABLE AGREEMENTS CLICK HERE

6) CAREY V HSBC (2009) CLICK HERE

7) DON'T BE BULLIED BY CREDITORS / DCA's CLICK HERE

8) IN DEBT DON'T PANIC CLICK HERE

9) FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT CLICK HERE

10) SALE OF GOODS ACT-EDUCATE YOUR RETAILER CLICK HERE

11) DISTANCE SELLING-EDUCATE YOR RETAILERCLICK HERE

12) SOGA SUMMARY CLICK HERE

13) WHICH? TEMPLATES [/url]CLICK HERE

14) DOES YOU BANK TREAT YOU FAIRLY BCOBSCLICK HERE

15) EVERYTHING HOUSING CLICK HERE

16) UTILITY BACKBILLING CLICK HERE

17) OFGEM - COMPLAINTSCLICK HERE

18) OFCOM - COMPLAINTS CLICK HERE

DON'T GIVE UP, THIS SITE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH GUIDANCE AND EMPOWERMENT

 

Don't forget to donate to this site

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Time for a 60's revival:-)

OOOHHH "free love" an all that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Rebel,

I (as added to post23) have taken a look at these "trade only"/ "wholesale" sites, one only has to "click on" the Ts & Cs/ returns policies sections to see that returns are restricted to "faulty" goods.

Also in the preamble/ intro to the site the words Trade Only and Wholesale are mentioned and more often than no highlighted.

 

If the "Trade only" is an attempt to introduce an exclusion from the DSR's (or their replacements), then any such term must be prominent, rather than buried in terms and conditions.

 

Lord Denning's "in red ink, with a red hand pointing to it "

could apply : (from Spurling v Bradshaw) http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_Spurling_Ltd_v_Bradshaw

 

As Brig has said : how prominent was this, either in the T's & C's or on the site, for a court to find if this really was "trade only".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If the "Trade only" is an attempt to introduce an exclusion from the DSR's (or their replacements), then any such term must be prominent, rather than buried in terms and conditions.

 

Lord Denning's "in red ink, with a red hand pointing to it "

could apply : (from Spurling v Bradshaw) http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_Spurling_Ltd_v_Bradshaw

 

As Brig has said : how prominent was this, either in the T's & C's or on the site, for a court to find if this really was "trade only".

 

How interesting there is no where on the home page that says "trade only" LOL.

This company just wants to extort money from consumers and withhold their rights.

I hope a court would recognise this, because at this rate I may file an application to small claims court for £25.

Even if I lose my case, I will be happy that I kept them on their toes.

 

Funnily enough the rude customer service assistant that couldn't seem to reply constructively to me XXXXXXXXXXXX THATS ALL I'M SAYING!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How interesting there is no where on the home page that says "trade only" LOL

This company just wants to extort money from consumers and withhold their rights.

I hope a court would recognise this, because at this rate I may file an application to small claims court for £25.

Even if I lose my case, I will be happy that I kept them on their toes.

 

Funnily enough the rude customer service assistant that couldn't seem to reply constructively to me XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.

 

I've looked too : it doesn't seem to be on the home page.

 

It is in the T's and C's : more than once. (At 7.7 and 11.1)

 

Not in red ink with a red hand pointing to it, but it is on a separate line and bolded.

In 11.1 it is specifically set out for Snickers products.

 

In the end, a court would have to rule if it (as a term introducing an exclusion) was sufficiently highlighted to be allowed to stand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If the "Trade only" is an attempt to introduce an exclusion from the DSR's (or their replacements), then any such term must be prominent, rather than buried in terms and conditions.

 

Lord Denning's "in red ink, with a red hand pointing to it "

could apply : (from Spurling v Bradshaw) http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_Spurling_Ltd_v_Bradshaw

 

As Brig has said : how prominent was this, either in the T's & C's or on the site, for a court to find if this really was "trade only".

The Ts &Cs Returns Policy are there to click on and read.

 

 

The Terms "trade only" and "wholesale" as said are frequently mentioned and more often than not highlighted.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've looked too : it doesn't seem to be on the home page.

 

It is in the T's and C's : more than once. (At 7.7 and 11.1)

 

Not in red ink with a red hand pointing to it, but it is on a separate line and bolded.

In 11.1 it is specifically set out for Snickers products.

 

In the end, a court would have to rule if it (as a term introducing an exclusion) was sufficiently highlighted to be allowed to stand.

 

I'm surprised all you who have replied haven't spotted the error this company has made selling this product to me (an online retail consumer).

In their T&C's it says:

 

"11.1 Please Note: Hall-Fast supplies to trade customers only."

 

The fact of the matter is I am NOT a trade customer, I am NOT part of a company or buying on behalf of a company. I am purchasing as an online retail customer.

 

I have got this dispute in the bag ;)

Edited by 2REAL2RYAN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm surprised all you who have replied haven't spotted the error this company has made selling this product to me (an online retail consumer).

In their T&C's it says:

 

"11.1 Please Note: Hall-Fast supplies to trade customers only."

 

The fact of the matter is I am not a trade customer, I am not part of a company or buying on behalf of a company. I am purchasing as an online retail customer.

 

I have got this dispute in the bag ;)

 

You claim you aren't a trade customer.

They'll claim that they don't need to make enquiries when you register on their site : their T's & C's are such that you hold yourself out to be a trade customer by agreeing to the T's & C's

 

It's a triable issue .....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You claim you aren't a trade customer.

They'll claim that they don't need to make enquiries when you register on their site : their T's & C's are such that you hold yourself out to be a trade customer by agreeing to the T's & C's

 

It's a triable issue .....

 

Errrrr not really, I am unemployed and have no affiliation in the trade industry. Unless anyone can prove I am then I constitute as a retail customer, just because I mistakenly purchase from a trade company does not constitute me as a trade customer. Especially when I only purchased a pair of jeans...think that says it all lol.

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Edited by 2REAL2RYAN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm surprised all you who have replied haven't spotted the error this company has made selling this product to me (an online retail consumer).

In their T&C's it says:

 

"11.1 Please Note: Hall-Fast supplies to trade customers only."

 

The fact of the matter is I am NOT a trade customer, I am NOT part of a company or buying on behalf of a company. I am purchasing as an online retail customer.

 

I have got this dispute in the bag ;)

 

If you had read the conditions would you still have purchased to benefit from trade terms??

Your mistake for ordering in the first place, my guess is you can complain as much as you like if the wholesaler digs in you will have to litigate.

 

You are equally responsible here imo.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Errrrr not really, I am unemployed and have no affiliation in the trade industry. Unless anyone can prove I am then I constitute as a retail customer, just because I mistakenly purchase from a trade company does not constitute me as a trade customer. Especially when I only purchased a pair of jeans...think that says it all lol.

 

Playing Devil's Advocate : a trader (A) has a retail customer (B) who asks them if they sell Snickers jeans.

They don't but agree to source a pair for one of their regular customers. A buy a pair on a trade only website as a trader, and act as a trader selling them on (at a profit) to B

 

The website has no way of knowing if A is a trader beyond the fact that it's T's & C's that A had to accept to submit their order.

 

The fact that this was for one pair of jeans only doesn't determine that it isn't trade.

It might increase the likelyhood it may not be trade but it is by no means conclusive.

 

I'm neither agreeing with you that it was never "trade",, nor agreeing with Brig that it had to be "trade"

I don't know how a court would rule : but I don't think it is as absolute as you feel confident it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 2Real2Ryan

 

Although Brigs disagree's with your position, you still need to respect him and his posts, you need to post within the site rules. I'm removing certain posts as they do not reflect the tone of the thread.


Welcome to Consumer Action Group

 

'Challenges are what makes life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.'

Joshua J. Marine

 

1) CLAIM BACK ALL PENALTY CHARGES CLICK HERE

2) CLAIM BACK ALL MIS-SOLD PPI CLICK HERE

3) COMPOUNDED CONTRACTUAL INTEREST CLICK HERE

4) REQUEST CCA FROM CREDITOR CLICK HERE

5) OFT- UNENFORCEABLE AGREEMENTS CLICK HERE

6) CAREY V HSBC (2009) CLICK HERE

7) DON'T BE BULLIED BY CREDITORS / DCA's CLICK HERE

8) IN DEBT DON'T PANIC CLICK HERE

9) FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT CLICK HERE

10) SALE OF GOODS ACT-EDUCATE YOUR RETAILER CLICK HERE

11) DISTANCE SELLING-EDUCATE YOR RETAILERCLICK HERE

12) SOGA SUMMARY CLICK HERE

13) WHICH? TEMPLATES [/url]CLICK HERE

14) DOES YOU BANK TREAT YOU FAIRLY BCOBSCLICK HERE

15) EVERYTHING HOUSING CLICK HERE

16) UTILITY BACKBILLING CLICK HERE

17) OFGEM - COMPLAINTSCLICK HERE

18) OFCOM - COMPLAINTS CLICK HERE

DON'T GIVE UP, THIS SITE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH GUIDANCE AND EMPOWERMENT

 

Don't forget to donate to this site

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi 2Real2Ryan

 

Although Brigs disagree's with your position, you still need to respect him and his posts, you need to post within the site rules. I'm removing certain posts as they do not reflect the tone of the thread.

 

Sure thing, my apologies.

 

I appreciate him putting fourth the opposite view, but he kept disagreeing with my argument when my points were valid. So it made sense to tell him where to go!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...