Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • As I recall the only thing you tried telling us was based on a quote that you selectively edited by Lord James of Blackheath. You misrepresented it as a statement of fact when it was actually a question which was laughed at by his peers in the House of Lords.  We told you it was garbage, you asked us to prove it and we did.   Remember?
    • you need to realise that for every person that does come to CAG and register and tell their story...there are poss 10'000 that don't but search the interweb whereby threads that are here pop up relating to like issues they are searching upon.   Most CAG siteteam and many other registered Caggers give advice that bears this in mind and post information which not only informs the starter of a thread upon what to do, but also takes into consideration the readers from the interweb that also read the relevant advice given that might not be brave enough to register and fess up.   to that end, there is very little alternative than to appear to give 'grief' [you deserve it - tough] to a cagger should certain previous advice not have been followed.....yours is a very classic case of such. hey I've found a backdoor CCJ.   to put it bluntly, had you have followed such previous advice, you most certainly would not be in the situation you are in here now.. .so by example, not giving you grief, for future readers...………..   ...never ever move without informing a debt owner of a move of address on any consumer debt that you last used or paid within the last say 7yrs. your credit file is a major key to ascertaining that information.... .but don't just read this advice come to the consumeractiongroup.co.uk website and let us help.   lecture over... what can you do..or more importantly....what can a claimant do now they have a default forthwith judgement against you. well we can't guess.... they might simply ignore it as 1000's of people with CCJ's find out..but it becomes an issue should you wish to say get a mortgage, remortgage or further credit.   i'm not going to enter into any of that here...that's for the reader to start a thread here and seek advice on their individual situation specific to them as you have done....   so...  bearing the all of the above in mind...over to you with regard to this backdoor CCJ.   as for the other debts that you didn't action before...go read your old thread and action what appropriate advice is given there for each type of debt that has been given should you wish to avoid any further backdoor CCJ's.   dx                    
    • hello my very good helpful friend. I am afraid to say that i did not. As i did not realise the relevance of it.   Should i be doing this right now of anyone on my credit file ?   Plz don't give me grief if u have already advised me...   do i do the ccs request now to everybody in that thread ?    
    • aha busted and stupid ...no wonder you've got mixed information here. never trust anything they say ..they have a very bad reputation for stating the truth.   now can you go get your credit file please..   there are cases whereby a council on historic CTAX debts do go for a county court CCJ, but a liability order from a magistrates court has far more clout legally than a county court CCJ and i've never heard of a court sending a bailiff out for 'multiple' CCJ collection.   me thinks he is pulling the wool here a bit and has looked at your credit file and seen CCJ's too so thought he'd chance his arm and use those as further leverage.   don't worry about the sat visit simply ignore do not answer the door if he appears. your task is too gather data at present.   credit file please..        
  • Our picks

2REAL2RYAN

online retailer refusing return - need advice ***Resolved***

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 1943 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hi Brigs

 

Trade / wholesale websites don't allow access to members of the public, you have to register with them, they carry out checks etc. This for some reason wasn't applicable to the OP. As you know terms and conditions can be unfair.

 

Hi Rebel,

I (as added to post23) have taken a look at these "trade only"/ "wholesale" sites, one only has to "click on" the Ts & Cs/ returns policies sections to see that returns are restricted to "faulty" goods.

Also in the preamble/ intro to the site the words Trade Only and Wholesale are mentioned and more often than no highlighted.


Welcome to Consumer Action Group

 

'Challenges are what makes life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.'

Joshua J. Marine

 

1) CLAIM BACK ALL PENALTY CHARGES CLICK HERE

2) CLAIM BACK ALL MIS-SOLD PPI CLICK HERE

3) COMPOUNDED CONTRACTUAL INTEREST CLICK HERE

4) REQUEST CCA FROM CREDITOR CLICK HERE

5) OFT- UNENFORCEABLE AGREEMENTS CLICK HERE

6) CAREY V HSBC (2009) CLICK HERE

7) DON'T BE BULLIED BY CREDITORS / DCA's CLICK HERE

8) IN DEBT DON'T PANIC CLICK HERE

9) FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT CLICK HERE

10) SALE OF GOODS ACT-EDUCATE YOUR RETAILER CLICK HERE

11) DISTANCE SELLING-EDUCATE YOR RETAILERCLICK HERE

12) SOGA SUMMARY CLICK HERE

13) WHICH? TEMPLATES [/url]CLICK HERE

14) DOES YOU BANK TREAT YOU FAIRLY BCOBSCLICK HERE

15) EVERYTHING HOUSING CLICK HERE

16) UTILITY BACKBILLING CLICK HERE

17) OFGEM - COMPLAINTSCLICK HERE

18) OFCOM - COMPLAINTS CLICK HERE

DON'T GIVE UP, THIS SITE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH GUIDANCE AND EMPOWERMENT

 

Don't forget to donate to this site

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Brigs

 

Trade / wholesale websites don't allow access to members of the public, you have to register with them, they carry out checks etc. This for some reason wasn't applicable to the OP. As you know terms and conditions can be unfair.

 

 

Hi Reb,

 

 

Most of these will allow Non Trade Purchases (tested this in the past) but the same Ts & Cs apply as to trade customers.

IMO unless the OP asks for a gesture of goodwill this will go nowhere.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Brigs

Trade / wholesale websites don't allow access to members of the public, you have to register with them, they carry out checks etc. This for some reason wasn't applicable to the OP. As you know terms and conditions can be unfair.

 

 

Yeah I can confirm they failed to undergoe checks on me.

 

This is getting so complicated especially if they argue they are trade only, could be quite hard using SOGA and the Consumers Contract Regulations, but I will still refer to it as it would be my only hope in getting these cowboys to comply with my return request.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Reb,

Most of these will allow Non Trade Purchases (tested this in the past) but the same Ts & Cs apply as to trade customers.

IMO unless the OP asks for a gesture of goodwill this will go nowhere.

 

Tomorrow I will let you guys know what they say, even if they refuse again I will keep going to the end, I ain't giving up just yet!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah I can confirm they failed to undergoe checks on me.

 

This is getting so complicated especially if they argue they are trade only, could be quite hard using SOGA and the Consumers Contract Regulations, but I will still refer to it as it would be my only hope in getting these cowboys to comply with my return request.

I can't agree with calling them cowboys, one must especially when buying on line check Ts & Cs and trading policies or take the consequences of not doing so.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I can't agree with calling them cowboys, one must especially when buying on line check Ts & Cs and trading policies or take the consequences of not doing so.

 

Yeah it would have been so much work and money for the company to put the words "NO RETURNS" on their homepage...I'm guessing you are probably one of their loyal employees haha.

 

At the end of the day, any company that replies to my emails in a rude/unhelpful manner and that notifies me about their NO RETURNS policy post-purchase via email is in my opinion a retail cowboy.

 

And yes I think I have learnt that in the future I need to check the T&C's since some online retailers like to be less vocal about their NO RETURNS policy...and like that's a coincidence lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A site can have all sorts of T & C's posted on their website, it doesn't make the T & C's fair or legal.

 

A classic example is Virgin Media, if you move somewhere where there is no Virgin Media coverage, they still expect you to pay the remaining months of the contract although you still want the product, but there is no coverage whatsoever. This is in their T & C's.

 

How fair is that?

 

I can't agree with calling them cowboys, one must especially when buying on line check Ts & Cs and trading policies or take the consequences of not doing so.

Welcome to Consumer Action Group

 

'Challenges are what makes life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.'

Joshua J. Marine

 

1) CLAIM BACK ALL PENALTY CHARGES CLICK HERE

2) CLAIM BACK ALL MIS-SOLD PPI CLICK HERE

3) COMPOUNDED CONTRACTUAL INTEREST CLICK HERE

4) REQUEST CCA FROM CREDITOR CLICK HERE

5) OFT- UNENFORCEABLE AGREEMENTS CLICK HERE

6) CAREY V HSBC (2009) CLICK HERE

7) DON'T BE BULLIED BY CREDITORS / DCA's CLICK HERE

8) IN DEBT DON'T PANIC CLICK HERE

9) FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT CLICK HERE

10) SALE OF GOODS ACT-EDUCATE YOUR RETAILER CLICK HERE

11) DISTANCE SELLING-EDUCATE YOR RETAILERCLICK HERE

12) SOGA SUMMARY CLICK HERE

13) WHICH? TEMPLATES [/url]CLICK HERE

14) DOES YOU BANK TREAT YOU FAIRLY BCOBSCLICK HERE

15) EVERYTHING HOUSING CLICK HERE

16) UTILITY BACKBILLING CLICK HERE

17) OFGEM - COMPLAINTSCLICK HERE

18) OFCOM - COMPLAINTS CLICK HERE

DON'T GIVE UP, THIS SITE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH GUIDANCE AND EMPOWERMENT

 

Don't forget to donate to this site

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yeah it would have been so much work and money for the company to put the words "NO RETURNS" on their homepage...I'm guessing you are probably one of their loyal employees haha.

 

 

NOT TRUE AND NOT FUNNY!!

 

At the end of the day, any company that replies to my emails in a rude/unhelpful manner and that notifies me about their NO RETURNS policy post-purchase via email is in my opinion a retail cowboy.

 

And yes I think I have learnt that in the future I need to check the T&C's since some online****** retailers**** like to be less vocal about their NO RETURNS policy...and like that's a coincidence lol.

 

 

When offering advice here one tries to see the logic of both sides of a problem.

 

 

You refer again to "retailers" the site you used appears to clearly " trade only/wholesale" not retail.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
A site can have all sorts of T & C's posted on their website, it doesn't make the T & C's fair or legal.

 

A classic example is Virgin Media, if you move somewhere where there is no Virgin Media coverage, they still expect you to pay the remaining months of the contract although you still want the product.

Hi reb,

 

 

The talk here is all about an "online retailer" looking at these sites again a few minutes ago all state " Trade Only"/" Wholesale"

But Not "retail".

If one wishes to take advantage of trade/wholesale prices offered by these dealers then their terms will still apply.

The titles of the sites make their status quite clear, obviously I cannot post links to such sites as they would be removed but they are there for all to see on the net.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
When offering advice here one tries to see the logic of both sides of a problem.

 

 

You refer again to "retailers" the site you used appears to clearly " trade only/wholesale" not retail.

 

I appreciate hearing both sides honestly, I just find it depressing that an online company can't even have the goodwill to accept the return of 1 item LOL.

Even when I have offered to pay a handling fee and delivery charges.

 

what's this world coming to...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't find anything that states Trade/Wholesale are an exception to consumer rights, he's not a trader buying in bulk.

 

The other thing is that Trade/Wholesale invoice, the OP's transaction was carried out immediately because he's not a Trader.

 

Lets see what delevlops, he has other options.

 

Let's see how we get on.

 

Hi reb,

 

 

The talk here is all about an "online retailer" looking at these sites again a few minutes ago all state " Trade Only"/" Wholesale"

But Not "retail".

If one wishes to take advantage of trade/wholesale prices offered by these dealers then their terms will still apply.

The titles of the sites make their status quite clear, obviously I cannot post links to such sites as they would be removed but they are there for all to see on the net.


Welcome to Consumer Action Group

 

'Challenges are what makes life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.'

Joshua J. Marine

 

1) CLAIM BACK ALL PENALTY CHARGES CLICK HERE

2) CLAIM BACK ALL MIS-SOLD PPI CLICK HERE

3) COMPOUNDED CONTRACTUAL INTEREST CLICK HERE

4) REQUEST CCA FROM CREDITOR CLICK HERE

5) OFT- UNENFORCEABLE AGREEMENTS CLICK HERE

6) CAREY V HSBC (2009) CLICK HERE

7) DON'T BE BULLIED BY CREDITORS / DCA's CLICK HERE

8) IN DEBT DON'T PANIC CLICK HERE

9) FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT CLICK HERE

10) SALE OF GOODS ACT-EDUCATE YOUR RETAILER CLICK HERE

11) DISTANCE SELLING-EDUCATE YOR RETAILERCLICK HERE

12) SOGA SUMMARY CLICK HERE

13) WHICH? TEMPLATES [/url]CLICK HERE

14) DOES YOU BANK TREAT YOU FAIRLY BCOBSCLICK HERE

15) EVERYTHING HOUSING CLICK HERE

16) UTILITY BACKBILLING CLICK HERE

17) OFGEM - COMPLAINTSCLICK HERE

18) OFCOM - COMPLAINTS CLICK HERE

DON'T GIVE UP, THIS SITE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH GUIDANCE AND EMPOWERMENT

 

Don't forget to donate to this site

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I appreciate hearing both sides honestly, I just find it depressing that an online company can't even have the goodwill to accept the return of 1 item LOL.

Even when I have offered to pay an admin fee and delivery charges.

 

what's this world coming to...

 

 

It's come to it, gone past it and is getting worse!


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Time for a 60's revival:-)

 

It's come to it, gone past it and is getting worse!

Welcome to Consumer Action Group

 

'Challenges are what makes life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.'

Joshua J. Marine

 

1) CLAIM BACK ALL PENALTY CHARGES CLICK HERE

2) CLAIM BACK ALL MIS-SOLD PPI CLICK HERE

3) COMPOUNDED CONTRACTUAL INTEREST CLICK HERE

4) REQUEST CCA FROM CREDITOR CLICK HERE

5) OFT- UNENFORCEABLE AGREEMENTS CLICK HERE

6) CAREY V HSBC (2009) CLICK HERE

7) DON'T BE BULLIED BY CREDITORS / DCA's CLICK HERE

8) IN DEBT DON'T PANIC CLICK HERE

9) FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT CLICK HERE

10) SALE OF GOODS ACT-EDUCATE YOUR RETAILER CLICK HERE

11) DISTANCE SELLING-EDUCATE YOR RETAILERCLICK HERE

12) SOGA SUMMARY CLICK HERE

13) WHICH? TEMPLATES [/url]CLICK HERE

14) DOES YOU BANK TREAT YOU FAIRLY BCOBSCLICK HERE

15) EVERYTHING HOUSING CLICK HERE

16) UTILITY BACKBILLING CLICK HERE

17) OFGEM - COMPLAINTSCLICK HERE

18) OFCOM - COMPLAINTS CLICK HERE

DON'T GIVE UP, THIS SITE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH GUIDANCE AND EMPOWERMENT

 

Don't forget to donate to this site

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Time for a 60's revival:-)

OOOHHH "free love" an all that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Rebel,

I (as added to post23) have taken a look at these "trade only"/ "wholesale" sites, one only has to "click on" the Ts & Cs/ returns policies sections to see that returns are restricted to "faulty" goods.

Also in the preamble/ intro to the site the words Trade Only and Wholesale are mentioned and more often than no highlighted.

 

If the "Trade only" is an attempt to introduce an exclusion from the DSR's (or their replacements), then any such term must be prominent, rather than buried in terms and conditions.

 

Lord Denning's "in red ink, with a red hand pointing to it "

could apply : (from Spurling v Bradshaw) http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_Spurling_Ltd_v_Bradshaw

 

As Brig has said : how prominent was this, either in the T's & C's or on the site, for a court to find if this really was "trade only".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If the "Trade only" is an attempt to introduce an exclusion from the DSR's (or their replacements), then any such term must be prominent, rather than buried in terms and conditions.

 

Lord Denning's "in red ink, with a red hand pointing to it "

could apply : (from Spurling v Bradshaw) http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_Spurling_Ltd_v_Bradshaw

 

As Brig has said : how prominent was this, either in the T's & C's or on the site, for a court to find if this really was "trade only".

 

How interesting there is no where on the home page that says "trade only" LOL.

This company just wants to extort money from consumers and withhold their rights.

I hope a court would recognise this, because at this rate I may file an application to small claims court for £25.

Even if I lose my case, I will be happy that I kept them on their toes.

 

Funnily enough the rude customer service assistant that couldn't seem to reply constructively to me XXXXXXXXXXXX THATS ALL I'M SAYING!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How interesting there is no where on the home page that says "trade only" LOL

This company just wants to extort money from consumers and withhold their rights.

I hope a court would recognise this, because at this rate I may file an application to small claims court for £25.

Even if I lose my case, I will be happy that I kept them on their toes.

 

Funnily enough the rude customer service assistant that couldn't seem to reply constructively to me XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.

 

I've looked too : it doesn't seem to be on the home page.

 

It is in the T's and C's : more than once. (At 7.7 and 11.1)

 

Not in red ink with a red hand pointing to it, but it is on a separate line and bolded.

In 11.1 it is specifically set out for Snickers products.

 

In the end, a court would have to rule if it (as a term introducing an exclusion) was sufficiently highlighted to be allowed to stand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If the "Trade only" is an attempt to introduce an exclusion from the DSR's (or their replacements), then any such term must be prominent, rather than buried in terms and conditions.

 

Lord Denning's "in red ink, with a red hand pointing to it "

could apply : (from Spurling v Bradshaw) http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_Spurling_Ltd_v_Bradshaw

 

As Brig has said : how prominent was this, either in the T's & C's or on the site, for a court to find if this really was "trade only".

The Ts &Cs Returns Policy are there to click on and read.

 

 

The Terms "trade only" and "wholesale" as said are frequently mentioned and more often than not highlighted.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've looked too : it doesn't seem to be on the home page.

 

It is in the T's and C's : more than once. (At 7.7 and 11.1)

 

Not in red ink with a red hand pointing to it, but it is on a separate line and bolded.

In 11.1 it is specifically set out for Snickers products.

 

In the end, a court would have to rule if it (as a term introducing an exclusion) was sufficiently highlighted to be allowed to stand.

 

I'm surprised all you who have replied haven't spotted the error this company has made selling this product to me (an online retail consumer).

In their T&C's it says:

 

"11.1 Please Note: Hall-Fast supplies to trade customers only."

 

The fact of the matter is I am NOT a trade customer, I am NOT part of a company or buying on behalf of a company. I am purchasing as an online retail customer.

 

I have got this dispute in the bag ;)

Edited by 2REAL2RYAN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm surprised all you who have replied haven't spotted the error this company has made selling this product to me (an online retail consumer).

In their T&C's it says:

 

"11.1 Please Note: Hall-Fast supplies to trade customers only."

 

The fact of the matter is I am not a trade customer, I am not part of a company or buying on behalf of a company. I am purchasing as an online retail customer.

 

I have got this dispute in the bag ;)

 

You claim you aren't a trade customer.

They'll claim that they don't need to make enquiries when you register on their site : their T's & C's are such that you hold yourself out to be a trade customer by agreeing to the T's & C's

 

It's a triable issue .....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You claim you aren't a trade customer.

They'll claim that they don't need to make enquiries when you register on their site : their T's & C's are such that you hold yourself out to be a trade customer by agreeing to the T's & C's

 

It's a triable issue .....

 

Errrrr not really, I am unemployed and have no affiliation in the trade industry. Unless anyone can prove I am then I constitute as a retail customer, just because I mistakenly purchase from a trade company does not constitute me as a trade customer. Especially when I only purchased a pair of jeans...think that says it all lol.

 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Edited by 2REAL2RYAN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm surprised all you who have replied haven't spotted the error this company has made selling this product to me (an online retail consumer).

In their T&C's it says:

 

"11.1 Please Note: Hall-Fast supplies to trade customers only."

 

The fact of the matter is I am NOT a trade customer, I am NOT part of a company or buying on behalf of a company. I am purchasing as an online retail customer.

 

I have got this dispute in the bag ;)

 

If you had read the conditions would you still have purchased to benefit from trade terms??

Your mistake for ordering in the first place, my guess is you can complain as much as you like if the wholesaler digs in you will have to litigate.

 

You are equally responsible here imo.


Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Errrrr not really, I am unemployed and have no affiliation in the trade industry. Unless anyone can prove I am then I constitute as a retail customer, just because I mistakenly purchase from a trade company does not constitute me as a trade customer. Especially when I only purchased a pair of jeans...think that says it all lol.

 

Playing Devil's Advocate : a trader (A) has a retail customer (B) who asks them if they sell Snickers jeans.

They don't but agree to source a pair for one of their regular customers. A buy a pair on a trade only website as a trader, and act as a trader selling them on (at a profit) to B

 

The website has no way of knowing if A is a trader beyond the fact that it's T's & C's that A had to accept to submit their order.

 

The fact that this was for one pair of jeans only doesn't determine that it isn't trade.

It might increase the likelyhood it may not be trade but it is by no means conclusive.

 

I'm neither agreeing with you that it was never "trade",, nor agreeing with Brig that it had to be "trade"

I don't know how a court would rule : but I don't think it is as absolute as you feel confident it is.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi 2Real2Ryan

 

Although Brigs disagree's with your position, you still need to respect him and his posts, you need to post within the site rules. I'm removing certain posts as they do not reflect the tone of the thread.


Welcome to Consumer Action Group

 

'Challenges are what makes life interesting; overcoming them is what makes life meaningful.'

Joshua J. Marine

 

1) CLAIM BACK ALL PENALTY CHARGES CLICK HERE

2) CLAIM BACK ALL MIS-SOLD PPI CLICK HERE

3) COMPOUNDED CONTRACTUAL INTEREST CLICK HERE

4) REQUEST CCA FROM CREDITOR CLICK HERE

5) OFT- UNENFORCEABLE AGREEMENTS CLICK HERE

6) CAREY V HSBC (2009) CLICK HERE

7) DON'T BE BULLIED BY CREDITORS / DCA's CLICK HERE

8) IN DEBT DON'T PANIC CLICK HERE

9) FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT CLICK HERE

10) SALE OF GOODS ACT-EDUCATE YOUR RETAILER CLICK HERE

11) DISTANCE SELLING-EDUCATE YOR RETAILERCLICK HERE

12) SOGA SUMMARY CLICK HERE

13) WHICH? TEMPLATES [/url]CLICK HERE

14) DOES YOU BANK TREAT YOU FAIRLY BCOBSCLICK HERE

15) EVERYTHING HOUSING CLICK HERE

16) UTILITY BACKBILLING CLICK HERE

17) OFGEM - COMPLAINTSCLICK HERE

18) OFCOM - COMPLAINTS CLICK HERE

DON'T GIVE UP, THIS SITE WILL PROVIDE YOU WITH GUIDANCE AND EMPOWERMENT

 

Don't forget to donate to this site

 

Please let us know how your problem has been resolved, it could help fellow Caggers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi 2Real2Ryan

 

Although Brigs disagree's with your position, you still need to respect him and his posts, you need to post within the site rules. I'm removing certain posts as they do not reflect the tone of the thread.

 

Sure thing, my apologies.

 

I appreciate him putting fourth the opposite view, but he kept disagreeing with my argument when my points were valid. So it made sense to tell him where to go!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...