Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thought I'd let you know. Despite not needing to, Parcel2Go have very kindly authorised a refund to cover the speakers. I am very impressed and surprised given the contract didn't require this. Thanks for all the advice - I thought it only fair to make sure they got some credit for doing the right thing. I will be using them again.  
    • Weatherford describes "unprecedented challenges" amid Covid but says Aberdeen will remain the centre of UK operations. View the full article
    • Please can you put up in PDF format – simply the documents that you are relying on as proof of payment. Redact them for account numbers et cetera. We don't need to see images of the damage et cetera. I understand that you are trying to recover £150 plus the delivery costs including the insurance cover – is this correct? What is the total value of this?
    • By the way, have sweatband.com actually refused to take responsibility for this now? Are they standing by the manufacturers position that it should not have been kept in a garage?
    • Sweatband.com like many of these online retailers – and also retail shops – which sell their goods, make all sorts of claims for their customer service et cetera – but when things go wrong they refer you to the manufacturer. Of course this can be a very sensible arrangement because the manufacturer is better placed to deal with the problem – but we tend to find that very often the manufacturer is pretty reluctant and of course because they are not the retailer, there really not too bothered about their customer-facing reputation. So as has been suggested by my site team colleague above, you are being fobbed off. Secondly, any attempt now to start saying that the treadmill should not be used in the garage – when this has not been referred to at all when it was being sold to you, is in effect introducing a new term into an existing contract. This means that it has no effect whatsoever and is not binding. Sweatband.com are bound by the law of contract and also by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. You are entitled to purchase a treadmill which is of satisfactory quality and remains that way for a reasonable period of time – and you are quite right, it hasn't matched up to those standards and so sweatband.com are in breach of contract. It has nothing to do with the manufacturer. If the manufacturer really wants to say that it should be kept in a garage then that's between them and sweatband. It's especially telling that according to you sweatband have actually said that this is a great thing to keep in your garage. I would suggest that you go around the Internet – trust pilot et cetera putting up reviews about sweatband – who as I have said after fobbing you off and letting you down – but also you should put up separate reviews about this particular brand of treadmill and make sure everybody sees that even the manufacturer is saying that it should be kept in a garage and that they won't stand by their product when it breaks down after three months. I can imagine that the person who said this to you from the manufacturer will get a bit of a talking to. Maybe you can tell us the make and model number of this treadmill so that references to it will come up in Google hits in the future. The situation as advised by my site team colleague is that as it has failed within the first six months, the retailer is entitled to one single opportunity to carry out a repair and failing that they are obliged either to replace the item or to give your refund at your option. These are rights which have been created by the Consumer Rights Act 2015. These rights should be asserted in writing You should write to the retailer immediately and put them on notice that you are asserting your rights under the 2015 act and you are giving them a single opportunity to repair the treadmill. Tell them that given its size and its weight, it will have to be repaired at your home unless sweatband.com want to take responsibility for picking it up and selling it to whoever they want to get it repaired by. I can imagine sweatband won't be happy about this and you are going to find everybody's going to start dragging their feet. I can imagine also that sweatband would try to up the ante by saying that it is your responsibility to return the treadmill to them. That would be wrong. The treadmill is defective. Sweatband are in breach – and it is up to them to deal with the problem. I think you will need to be quite assertive and I would suggest that your letter to them should give them a seven day window to let you know what the arrangements are and that the treadmill should be repaired or replaced in any event within 14 days. Please keep us informed as to what happens. Just so you know what we will advise if sweatband don't step up to the mark – if they don't let you have a satisfactory response within the first seven days then we will be suggesting that you begin the claims process by sending them a letter of claim – which then leads to a small claim in the County Court. This is not something you should worry about. Your chances of success are much better than 95% and I can imagine that at the end of the day sweatband.com don't want this kind of trouble and once they realise that you are happy to confront them, they will buckle down. Of course you never know – maybe they are going to act brilliantly and respond correctly immediately – in which case it will be kudos to them. Let's see  
  • Our picks

    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
       
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
       
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
       
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
       
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
       
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
       
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
       
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
       
       
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 31 replies
    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies

Davies Group - painfully slow home insurance claim


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2220 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Apologies if this appears more than once as I cannot seem to get the hang of finding the correct section to post to let alone having my post published, so if this appears as a duplicate, my apologies.

 

Hello

I have had an incredibly difficult time dealing with the insurance loss adjusters (Davies Group) for my claim. It has been a year now and relates to escape of water in my home.

 

My question is this; the adjuster required me to supply 3 quotes one of which had to be from their own approved builder. Their builder declined to quote, and I nonetheless supplied the 3 quotes to the adjuster. The Adjuster eventually got back insisting that their own builder supply a quote. We asked them again and this time they did supply a quote. Since the adjuster already saw my builders quotes how can we be sure that there wasn't any collusion between adjuster and their own builders with regard to their bid.

Secondly, since the adjuster will only take the lowest bid, what is the point of me getting quotes from my builders when an insurance builder will always come up with the lowest quote.

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Insurers will obviously ensure that they get the works done as cheap as possible. But at the end of the day the work has to be done, so that the house is put back to the way it was prior to the claim event.

 

If Davies groups own contractor does come up with a cheaper quote, ask for a copy of the quote confirming the scope of the works they will be doing and what materials will be used. Then compare this with the other quotes obtained. What csn sometimes happen is that the Insurers contractor will try to get away with using cheaper materials, which are not of the same quality, as those that were damaged. This is obviously wrong and the only difference should be the labour rate. If the Insurers contractor is willing to work for a cheaper rate, then it is your choice whether you trust them or you pay the difference to use the contractor of your choice.

 

There have been similar complaints on here before about Davies group. If you are not happy being messed around, you should make a formal complaint to the Insurers you have the policy with.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pleased to see you found the right spot :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Insurance contractors will almost always work to a 'schedule of rates' - this is a preagreed figure for a specific element of work, regardless of the actual job.

 

As an example, they might pay a fixed cost of £400 per room to dry a property out, including hire of dehumidifers, collection, readings visits etc, whilst your contractor may charge £75/week for the hire, and another £50 per monitoring visit - for a quick job, clearly the local contractor will be cheaper but for a long drawn out job, their insurance contractor will be cheaper. For removing and refitting a kitchen unit, they might pay £112.74 regardless of if it's awkward to remove.

 

On some jobs, the insurance contractor will be cheaper, on others, a local contractor will be cheaper. Ultimately, if the insurance contractor is willing to undercut your own quotes (and has seen them), it makes no difference. That is the price that they can get the work carried out for.

 

As UncleBulgaria has said, they should be able to supply an uncosted scope of works for you to ensure they are quoting for the same thing. There are certainly benefits of using an insurance contractor - you have the protection of the final ombudsman should anything go wrong later on, for start.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A schedule of works was drawn up by my surveyor and this was given to all the builders that quoted including the insurance company builder.

 

How about the fact that the adjuster saw the bids from my builders before the his builders actually provided a quote. Would there not have been some collusion between the two parties thus ensuring that the insurance builder quote was the lowest? Can I go somewhere with this?

 

The Insurers will obviously ensure that they get the works done as cheap as possible. But at the end of the day the work has to be done, so that the house is put back to the way it was prior to the claim event.

 

If Davies groups own contractor does come up with a cheaper quote, ask for a copy of the quote confirming the scope of the works they will be doing and what materials will be used. Then compare this with the other quotes obtained. What csn sometimes happen is that the Insurers contractor will try to get away with using cheaper materials, which are not of the same quality, as those that were damaged. This is obviously wrong and the only difference should be the labour rate. If the Insurers contractor is willing to work for a cheaper rate, then it is your choice whether you trust them or you pay the difference to use the contractor of your choice.

 

There have been similar complaints on here before about Davies group. If you are not happy being messed around, you should make a formal complaint to the Insurers you have the policy with.

Link to post
Share on other sites
How about the fact that the adjuster saw the bids from my builders before the his builders actually provided a quote. Would there not have been some collusion between the two parties thus ensuring that the insurance builder quote was the lowest? Can I go somewhere with this?

 

No... you could go back to your builder and say the insurance company will do it for £x - will you reduce your price to match? which is no different.

 

Edit: my number one tip to speed up a claim with a loss adjuster is to politely hassle the insurer (not the loss adjuster) frequently. If you're waiting for a callback, ring the insurer daily until you get it - and if they tell you to speak to the loss adjuster, say you've tried that and it's not working. They should be taking ultimate responsibility.

Link to post
Share on other sites
No... you could go back to your builder and say the insurance company will do it for £x - will you reduce your price to match? which is no different.

 

Edit: my number one tip to speed up a claim with a loss adjuster is to politely hassle the insurer (not the loss adjuster) frequently. If you're waiting for a callback, ring the insurer daily until you get it - and if they tell you to speak to the loss adjuster, say you've tried that and it's not working. They should be taking ultimate responsibility.

 

That is really the best advice. Hassle your Insurance company and you are quite likely to achieve an outcome you are happy with.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for all your replies they are very helpful indeed.

 

It seems from reading in this forum that the quality of work by insurance builders is questionable. Is there anything I can do to verify the quality of the work of this particular insurance builder. I would never dream of using a builder for this major re-instatement work without checking references. What rights do I have with regard to assessing the insurance builder's competency?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi far20

 

Could you confirm you are in the UK?

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites
:thumb:

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites
Thank you so much for all your replies they are very helpful indeed.

 

It seems from reading in this forum that the quality of work by insurance builders is questionable. Is there anything I can do to verify the quality of the work of this particular insurance builder. I would never dream of using a builder for this major re-instatement work without checking references. What rights do I have with regard to assessing the insurance builder's competency?

 

You have full rights against your Insurers to make sure the work is done properly. If the contractor failed, the Insurers would have to pay the relevant sum to get the work done to the right standard.

 

You could ask for the contractors full details and make your own checks. I doubt the Davies group would supply references from satisfied customers unless they were available already.

 

It is your house and you can do what you want, but the budget for the works is the cheapest quote obtained. A member of my family had a large water damage claim, they wanted their own contractors, so they obtained cash payments from the Insurers to pay for materials and to pay contractors. If your Insurers agree to similar, it would be your responsibility and you have no comeback on Insurers if works went wrong.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Hi, new to this site as I'm trying to help my mum and her 9 month battle with Saga and Davies loss adjusters. Is there anybody still on here for advice please . Thank you Stephanie:)was reading posts from 2012 re having the right to ask your insurers for a new loss adjust company? :)

Any advice greatly appreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi steffijo

 

Could you please start you own thread rather than ask on someone elses thread.

 

This way you will get the help required to assist you in your issue.

 

If unsure how to start a new thread See Below.

How to Upload Documents/Images on CAG - **INSTRUCTIONS CLICK HERE**

FORUM RULES - Please ensure to read these before posting **FORUM RULES CLICK HERE**

I cannot give any advice by PM - If you provide a link to your Thread then I will be happy to offer advice there.

I advise to the best of my ability, but I am not a qualified professional, benefits lawyer nor Welfare Rights Adviser.

Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 months later...

I am also suffering at the hands of Davies Group after four and a half months. They workers employed nice guys to a man but don't let em in the house. Today i have been told by the loss adjuster, "you just want to compalin about everything." Damn right i do when the catalogue of errors never ends, the work is sub standard, and everyone promises the earth but in actual fact does next to nothing. How they maintain business is worrying, cheap labour, cheap materials, and no customer service.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...