Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Partnership Advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3556 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

A friend of mine is currently a partner in a business where the relationship between the partners has broken down and my friend wants to know if they can set up a replacement / competing business or do they have to wait until the partnership has been dissolved (it is unlikely to trade without him).

 

 

I think there are assets but no written partnership agreement.

 

 

Can anyone help or give their thoughts.

 

 

Thanks in advance.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What kind of partnership? Limited company or just HMRC registed?If the latter then it is easy to dissolve the partnership, you just inform the tax office of the date the partnership ceased trading.

What assets are owned by the company? If it is just tools or stock then the disposal should be noted on tax return and any profit or loss (or if just kept, any personal gain) entered on the returns in the appropriate place(s)

What does the other partner think of all this? Can your friend set up a competing firm? well, yes, unless they entered an agreement that says otherwise. It doesnt have to be in writing so careful thought should be given to just undermining the existing business as the other partner may have comeback.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

 

I understand the following is correct for this business:

 

  • The business is a simple partnership registered with HMRC (it is not a limited company or a LLP)
  • The company has few tangible assets. What it does have is some cash in the bank, a reasonably well known name, some design IP and a customer list (however this can easily be found in published sources with a few hours work)
  • The other partner does not know what he wants and seems to want an unfair settlement
  • There is no partnership agreement (crazy in my view) so there are no non-competition clauses (also crazy)
  • As for undermining the existing business. I think my friend would do this simply by leaving as the other partner does not seem to do a lot and certainly none of the design work or creative things

Thanks again for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the point about the other partner not knowing what he wants but is asking for an unfair settlement does clash. Your friend should make a formal offer and then if that it not accepted, divide the tangible assets like cash in the agreed proportions or 50/50 and then try and settle on the intangibles like the business name and goodwill. If the latter is not possible then starting afresh and using the existing contacts is perfectly reasonable but expect the ex-partner to do the same if that is technically possible. If the other partner is not as driven as your friend he will soon allow the rest to drop and your friend can pick up the IP for nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...