Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Welcome Finance PPI Claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3479 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

I sent a SAR to Welcome Finance and have just received my paperwork. I’m hoping to claim back the mis-sold PPI on 3 loans I had through Welcome Finance.

 

I’m having some problems getting my head round how to work this out and was wondering if someone could please help me?

 

My first loan was taken out on 09/09/2003 and this was refinanced on 27/09/2004 and then refinanced again on 11/01/2006.

 

I've read the notes on PPI reclaiming on here but I’m confused when it comes to working out the figures. I can get so far on the first loan but then I don’t understand it when the loans are refinanced.

 

Also, I have insurance rebates when the loans were refinanced; I then set up a Debt Management Plan in February 2007 and then the loan was sold to a Debt Collector on 01/01/2010.

 

All very confusing I’m afraid but hopefully someone can help :???:

 

Many thanks :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi and welcome to CAG :-)

 

This is going to be a little more complex than normal because your loan dated January 2006 is more than likely going to be dealt with by the FSCS while the previous two will be dealt with by Welcome themselves.

 

The FSCS will only pay out 90% of the total amount as well so that is something else to be remembered.

 

So before we start, have you got the agreements, a record of all of the payments made and the amounts of the rebates on refinancing?

 

Also have a read here regarding the FSCS side of things.

 

http://www.fscs.org.uk/what-we-cover/questions-and-answers/qas-for-welcome-financial-hn0qripj/#I_would_like_to_make_a_PPI_claim_against_the_firm_How_do_I_go_about_this_

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thanks for coming back to me.

 

I've had a read of the FSCS website and noticed that they will only deal with WF claims after 14 January 2005.

 

I have all the paperwork... agreements, payment history, loan history etc for all 3 loans. I've scanned them all on to my computer and blanked out my personal details but what's the best way to upload them on to here?

 

Thank you :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

what's the best way to upload them on to here?

 

Thank you :-)

 

You can follow these instructions by dx100uk. Please make sure they are PDF files first.

 

set your default scan page size to A4 less than 300DPI [150 will do]

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc

but leave all monetary figures and dates.

.

************************* ************************* *******

{DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN OR USE SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS]

************************* ************************* ***********

.

DO IT IN MSPAINT.EXE or any photo editing program

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites ...

http://freejpgtopdf.com/

http://www.convert-jpg-to-pdf.net/

..

if you have multiple scans/pics

put them in a word doc FIRST and convert that to PDF

or http://www.freepdfconvert.com/

or

use http://www.pdfmerge.com

 

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

or use Primo PDF.

.

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

though DONT USE BANK NAMES or CAGicon in the title

i'e Default notice DDicon-mm-yyyy

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

...

YOU DONT have to put a link to the attachment in the msg box..just upload it ..job done

you can click on your links to check them too!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I've uploaded all documents for Loan's 1, 2 & 3...

 

I've also uploaded agreements 4 & 5 - for some reason, they decided to change the agreement number another couple of times... not sure why. I do have some different figures on them so thought they might be useful.

 

I really appreciate any help at all with this.

 

Many thanks :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so for loan 1 you need to work out the percentage of PPI to the total loan (excluding the acceptance fee.

 

PPI is £347.94 and total loan excluding the £75 is £2,097.94. Percentage is 347.94/2097.94 x 100 = 16.58%

 

So 16.98% of each repayment you made was for the PPI part of the loan.

 

Monthly repayment is £118.16 so 16.58% of that is £19.59.

 

In the Statutory Interest spreadsheet (see my article linked at No.1 in my signature), enter each payment of £19.59 actually made.

 

When you have done that, come back here for the next bit and we will work out the amount rolled into loan 2.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was mis-sold then yes. (chances are it was indeed mis-sold).

 

Same principle...work out the percentage of the total loan and hence the percentage of repayment and enter those in the spreadsheet.

 

Actually, it might be an idea to do a separate sheet for the healthcare.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK in the article of mine which you have read (no.1 in my signature), right at the end there is a loan analysis spreadsheet.

 

Use that and enter the three bits of information requested in the top section. The sheet will show you how your loan would progress over time.

 

It looks like you made 11 payments and if you look at the Loan Analysis spreadsheet you will see that the balance on the loan after 11 payments would be £1,292.22.

 

16.58% of that was the PPI part of the loan = £214.25.

 

What was the amount of the rebate you got when loan 1 was settled?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK so the PPI balance was £214.25 and they rebated you £63.79. Therefore you were "under rebated" by £150.46.

 

This was the excess amount of PPI which was carried into loan 2.

 

So using the principles of percentages outlined above, you can now work out what percentage of PPI was on loan 2 for both its own PPI and the amount carried over from loan 1.

 

Apply those percentages to the monthly repayments to find out the amounts you were paying each month for PPI and enter those figures into the spreadsheet.

 

Follow the same principles for the health insurance.

 

When you have done that, shout here and we will move on.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, I've done that.

 

I've added the PPI rolled over from loan 1 and the PPI on loan 2 together and have put them both on the same spreadsheet as these two are to be sent to WF.

 

Should I do the same thing for working out loan 3? (I paid weekly, by the looks of things, but was still charged monthly interest). Also, in three instances I made 5 payments in a month depending on how long the month was. Is this gonna be more tricky to work out?

 

Thanks :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to work out what the excess PPI from loan 2 was when it was paid off just as we did for loan 1.

 

That excess balance should feature as the last entry on your spreadsheet.

 

You then do a new spreadsheet for loan 3 as this is the account which will be dealt with by the FSCS.

 

When lodging your complaint for loan 3, you need to make sure they understand that the amount borrowed was higher than it would have been due to excess balances of PPI being included from loans 1 and 2.

 

When your spreadsheets are done you can lodge your complaints.

 

For the first two loans you can use the fos consumer questionnaire which is available from the fos website. For loan 3 use the FSCS questionnaire.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, thanks for that.

 

Is there a particular reason that FSCS should know that or is it just to make them aware that WF didn't work out the rebates properly on the first and second loans?

 

Also, where I have two loans with WF, will I need to complete 2 fos questionnaires?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the first two loans are linked then you can do the one questionnaire to cover both.

 

The reason you need to make the FSCS aware is that the amount you borrowed on loan 3 would have been higher than it would have been had you not had PPI on the first two loans. That is because you were "under rebated".

 

Therefore you would have been paying more interest than you should have been as well so you want that addressed when they do their redress calculations.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right OK, I understand where you're coming from.

 

Just to double check... on loan 3 I made payments weekly - some months I made 4 payments, some were 5 payments. Do I put that on the spreadsheet as weekly payment dates and how am I working out the PPI percentage, weekly again?

 

Thanks for your help with this... nearly there! :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the spreadsheet you enter the payments you actually made with the dates you made them. So if they were weekly you enter them as weekly payments.

 

The PPI percentage isn't connected with the frequency of payments, only the amount paid.

 

For example if you had PPI of 10% of the total loan and you made a payment of £50 then the PPI part of the payment is £5. If another payment was made the following week then you apply the 10% to whatever amount was paid that following week.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

I've put the weekly payments on the spreadsheet for loan 3 and have worked out the percentage that was PPI on each of them. I do have another couple of problems though...

 

I'm trying to work out the PPI rebate I should have had from loan 2 - have I worked this out correctly:

 

I made 13 payments of 138.30 and 1 payment of £60.00.

 

It's the Loan Analysis Calculator I'm getting confused with here... after 13 payments of £138.30, I'm left with £2424.69 of the loan.

 

I made 1 payment of £60.00 (£60.00 x 26.05% = £15.63) ???? – is this correct? If it is, do I then take the £15.63 off £2424.69.

 

(26.05% x £2409.06 = £627.56 PPI

Insurance rebate from WF - £203.32

Under rebated - £424.24)

 

Also for loan 3... my problem once again is with the Loan Analysis Calculator - how do I work out the balance of the loan after making the payments I've listed below:

 

I made 32 payments of £29.84

1 payment of £37.07

1 payment of £45.38

3 payments of £39.86

1 payment of £3.56

 

I find it more straight forward if the payments are monthly! I can't get my head around this to work out the rebate of insurance I should have been given when the loan came to an end.

 

Thanks again for your help :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

On loan 2 it looks like you are about right.

 

On loan 3, given the "erratic" nature of the payments you are going to have to use your best estimate as to what the balance was at settlement and apply the percentages to that figure.

 

Bear in mind that you are only looking to get at an approximate figure so that you can take an informed view if any offer they make is right.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Ok, I've had a reply for the FSCS PPI reclaim and they've

decided that I'm eligible for compensation.

 

They've sent me their calculations but I'm utterly confused! :???:

 

They've calculated my loss at £922.21

They've paid me £829.99 (90% of above figure)

 

The spreadsheet I sent them works out at around £1,300.00

and I can't work out where the possible shortfall is.

 

Do they not add the 8% interest in their calculations as I've seen that

Welcome do?

 

I was wondering if anyone understands how they work these figures out.

 

Many thanks in advance :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi there,

 

I've had a response from WFSL to my PPI complaint for the first two loans (pre Jan 2005).

 

They are upholding my complaint but have not included the Medicare in

 

their calculations from both loans, which in total is an extra £250.00.

 

I did add these to my original spreadsheet and also stated in my letter to

 

them that I wanted to claim those back aswell.

 

Considering they added the Medicare with the original loan disbursement

 

(under insurance premiums advanced) and then added interest on these,

 

do you have any idea why they aren't paying this back with the PPI claim?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...