Jump to content

 

BankFodder BankFodder


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I am bound to say that their alleged contract is probably the weirdest I have seen. Considering it is supposed to be a serious legal contract to set out the conditions under which CEL manage the parking on land that does not belong to them it leaves a lot to be desired. For a start it does not comply with the BPA Code of Practice which is   7.3 a the definition of the land on which you may operate, so that the boundaries of the land can be clearly defined b any conditions or restrictions on parking control and enforcement operations, including any restrictions on hours of operation c any conditions or restrictions on the types of vehicles that may, or may not, be subject to parking control and enforcement d who has the responsibility for putting up and maintaining signs e the definition of the services provided by each party to the agreement.   Sono  mention of hours: no mention of types of vehicle restrictions: no mention of who is responsible for the erection and maintenance of signage and much more serious -no mention that CEL have to comply with the BPA Code of conduct-that one is listed on 7.1.  All it states is that the operator can pursue outstanding PCs in accordance with the COP but that is not the same as saying that CEL will abide by the CoP which it must say. Also AFAIK the only entity that can pursue for trespass is the land owner regardless of what this quasi agreement says. There is also no mention of the financial aspect of the arrangement nor how the long it lasts and what notice is required for either side to terminate.     It might be worth writing [not emailing ]to Medburn Estates asking them to confirm if this is the only agreement with CEL and whether they think it right that CEL have not received planning permission for their signs from the Council rendering their signs illegal which is more serious than unlawful and therefore all PCNs issued are worthless and should not have been issued as it is impossible to form a contract with motorists when the signs are illegal. Also that as CEL are their agents Medburn Estates LTD are responsible for the actions of their agents. You could also ask them to cofirm that the signature on the paper is that of their Director, Anthony Brown and whether their copy has a counter signature of a CEL representative. Carry on that CEL are taking you to Court and as another Judge has asked a Landowner to appear in front of him to explain their contract, whether it might be in the best interest of Medway to have a serious conversation with CEL to avoid any possible  embarrassments in your  [ie Laluna] Court appearance.        
    • UncleB - where you write "This could lead you to facing the Bank in Court..."   1stly -  would that mean now?  by remote hearing?  Or when the courts open after the summer?   2ndly - Does the application for set aside automatically prevent the B hearing going ahead?   3rdly - Will sending in an application to have the B petition set aside mean that I have to disclose an address for service?   I can only give a mailing address   4thly - Could having an early (remote) set aside hearing potentially quicken up the process for the bank if I am obliged to give them a suitable place for service?  At the moment I assume the hearing was adjourned for lack of physical service.   I want/ need to get a set aside.  But don't want to shoot myself in the foot.  
    • Where I have sight of a letter which states the following: "a) the case is removed from scheduled date and time on the court list forthwith    b) the case will be re-listed on the 1st open date after x few months, a date to be advised" Is there any way a hearing would be any earlier than suggested?  Lockdown closed courts but may they open early?    Could the bank ask it to be brought forward even with lockdown still in place officially til end July?    Would that depend on them physically serving a b petition?   Could the 1st open date be any time up to Christmas with such a potential back log of cases?  
    • How a fast-growing baby food firm saw investors pull out because of the Covid-19 crisis. View the full article
    • A large decline in advertising expenditure is hurting the sector, plus TV channels and newspapers. View the full article
  • Our picks

    • View this quiz Employment status during COVID-19
      What do you do if you’ve been told not to come to work due to the current crisis.  Watch the video here or on the Youth Consumer Service Instagram page.

      Did you learn anything? Do the quiz
       
       
      Submitter BankFodder Type One Right Answer Time 5 minutes Total Questions 8 Category The Youth Consumer Service Submitted 15/05/20  
      • 0 replies
    • One Parking Solutions - Damning judgement. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/421148-one-parking-solutions-damning-judgement/
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 63 replies
    • View this quiz Coping with extreme hardship
      Life can be tough when you're entering the world of work and in the present virus crisis, things are even more difficult.

      Watch the video below or go to the Youth Consumer Service Instagram page . Afterwards, you can see if you've understood the points which are being made by taking the quiz.
       
       
      Submitter BankFodder Type One Right Answer Time 5 minutes Total Questions 8 Category The Youth Consumer Service Submitted 15/05/20  
      • 1 reply
    • View this quiz: Pre-pay meters
      An explanation of how some gas and electric companies offer emergency quarantine support.

       
      Watch the video here – or go to the Youth Consumer Service Instagram page and watch it there. Then come back here and do the quiz
       
       
      Submitter BankFodder Type One Right Answer Time 5 minutes Total Questions 6 Category The Youth Consumer Service Submitted 15/05/20  
      • 1 reply
squirrelly Whirley

IDS Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Remains

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2142 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

 

Do you think he'll cry?

 

NoI think he'll be on this forum tomorrow complaining that his boss sacked him unfairly and didn't follow procedure! :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Will he get JSA© ??? :smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No news so it looks like we're stuck with him ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Think about it logically, he's made the job 'untenable' and made himself 'unemployable and lacking in compassion' so sadly I think we are stuck with him, I did hear he might be moved into the Foreign Secretary post - perhaps he can redeem himself there 'stopping the wrong people' come into this country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah a few weeks ago it was clear they lost faith in him.

 

He offered to voluntarily cut the DWP budget even more, but funny enough the chancellor refused, perhaps realising they starting to get the wrong publicity on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My hero, the only man with the guts to take on the system and retract all these give-aways left to them by Gordon Brown and Liarbour. The country must live within it's means.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, Conniff, sometimes I think you really are just a wind-up merchant.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not a wind up. Someone has to get this escalating benefits culture under control, it is killing this country.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IDS is going nowhere....Esther Mcvey would be the likely replacement IF he were to go, but looking very unlikely he is going. Would shudder at the thought of Mcvey too. Wasn't she the one who said if you place disabled claimants money at the top of a ladder, they'd all manage to get up there and get it. Nasty nasty woman.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Been confirmed IDS is staying...no surprise at all there.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
My hero, the only man with the guts to take on the system and retract all these give-aways left to them by Gordon Brown and Liarbour. The country must live within it's means.

 

Indeed, like Romanian Gypsies who are over here claiming child benefit, HB, JSA, WTC after paying NOTHING in to the system - yes, it is well under control.

 

Here was me thinking the UKs welfare state was for people who fell on hard times such as illness, redundancy etc not for foreigners to come in to the country and bleed the system dry (as well as health, education and housing)

 

Silly me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's not a wind up. Someone has to get this escalating benefits culture under control, it is killing this country.

 

http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/numbers - Spending on welfare has dropped over the last five years (£5.6Billoin by central government). Spend on pensions has increased by £33.2Billion in the same period. If you want make any worthwhile cut in the spend on benefits, the answer is simple. Cut the state pension and get rid of the OAPs.

Scrap the state pension, and you will save £110Billion (based on 2015 budget), reducing the ageing population will free up a large chunk of housing stock, and NHS spend will also fall.

Edited by Conniff
I have removed your silly remark tying me with the DM, I see no mention of it at all.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

Quote
No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It's not a wind up. Someone has to get this escalating benefits culture under control, it is killing this country.

 

I would say you trolling but you are a staff member on this forum?

 

Maybe its just a lack of intelligence instead, because you appear to be saying the country can afford 100+ billion of tax cuts, writeoffs and bailouts but not the much smaller amount supposedbly saved by IDS. Not to mention brown and blair gave nothing away to the sick and disabled. Under their tenure IB and DLA was tightened up and ESA eventually introduced.

 

Comments such as benefits are killing this country is meaningless, its just a sweeping statement based on propaganda.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We launch an aircraft carrier for which we have no planes in order to fight an enemy that doesn't exist. We fight two discretionary wars that achieved nothing except chaos in the Middle East and a huge pile of corpses. We maintain, at great expense, a nuclear weapon that we'll never, ever use. We're running a deficit that isn't all that high by historical standards, and yet we blame the sick, disabled and unemployed for a crisis that's been entirely invented.

 

I want no further part of this. I'm voting "Yes".


PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Tories:

If you are rich, successful and pay high taxes you are OK by us.

Tories:

If you are unemployed, sick and rely on some help from money most have put in anyway - we want you to die

 

Parasites

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

never fear.........they will have another horrific experience lined up. however hopefully now it will be under closer scrutiny from day one.......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/numbers - Spending on welfare has dropped over the last five years (£5.6Billoin by central government). Spend on pensions has increased by £33.2Billion in the same period. If you want make any worthwhile cut in the spend on benefits, the answer is simple. Cut the state pension and get rid of the OAPs.

Scrap the state pension, and you will save £110Billion (based on 2015 budget), reducing the ageing population will free up a large chunk of housing stock, and NHS spend will also fall.

 

Not a very sensibly thought out post. What would you like, euthanasia of everyone who reaches 65.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

can you change your title . you had got my hopes up when reading the title of your thread, only to be dashed has he is not leaving.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
can you change your title . you had got my hopes up when reading the title of your thread, only to be dashed has he is not leaving.

 

 

I don't think it matters who is in the job - they are singing the party tune, and shooting from the hip.

They will not do an about turn and admit they got it wrong, plus its a poisoned chalice, IDS is going nowhere so leave it to him to keep taking the flack is probably their motto.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone ever seen Conniff and IDS together?

 

Maybe that's the answer


Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Moved to the Bear Garden for general discussion

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be worse. Could have been Michael Gove. Now that would be scary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could be EVEN WORSE than that and have HAGUE!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...