Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks @lolerz. I've attached it to the post. What do you think? What's the organ grinder? NTK.pdf
    • I'm afraid that if the value of the item was under declared then that is probably the best that you can hope for. Also, because the item was incorrectly addressed – even by a single letter, if that because the issue relating to the delivery then that has probably compounded the problem. There is probably very little that can be done. If you are lucky you will get the item back and then you can start again and declare it properly. Undervaluing parcels which are sent by any means is always going to cause a problem if the item is lost or damaged. It may mean that the cost of delivery is slightly less – but at the end of the day the risk becomes yours. When you enter into any kind of contract, effectively you declare it a level of risk to your contracting partner – and they decide to enter into the contract with you based on that level of risk. You have declared a level of risk and £50 – and that's the deal.   Additionally, undervaluing an item which is an internationally has the effect also of evading customs and any VAT system which is in force in that country – and that makes the whole thing a little bit more serious
    • Perfect. Nice and brief and to the point. You don't bother to start telling your life story. Just the way it should be. Send it off. You have probably done enough reading to understand that it won't make any difference don't start drafting your particulars of claim. Open an account with the MoneyClaim County Court system and start preparing. Post your particulars of claim here before you click it off. You may have noticed that at some point you will be asked if you want to go to mediation on this. We used to advise it but now we recommend that you decline mediation and go to trial. Your chances of success are much better than 95%. Going to trial will incur an additional hearing fee but of course you will get that back. However if you go to mediation, they will simply try to penny pinch and to get you to compromise and also they will sign you up to a confidentiality agreement and probably threaten you if you breach it. Not only that, if the mediation fails because you stand your ground, it will add additional delay while they then give you a date to go to trial. The best thing to do is to decline mediation – prepare for court hearing. Pay the extra fee. The chances are that rather than get a judgement against them they will then offer you a full settlement rather than go to court. If they do offer you full settlement then you will be obliged to accept it – but that's what you want. If they don't offer you full settlement then you will go to trial and there will be a judgement against them. Just so that you understand, our first interest is that you get your money back – but a close second is that it does go to trial and there is a judgement which we will then be able to use to help other people. Anyway as you should realise, we will help you all the way.
    • I sent a parcel to Singapore but i spelt the address incorrecltly by 1 letter so the parcel couldnt be delivered and was returned back to the Uk but checking the tracking today the parcel had returned to the UK but is somehow on its way back to Singapore as the tracking says "Item leaving the UK"    Ive spoken ( tweeted) Royal Mail help who confirm that the parcel seems to be going back to Singapore and that if its not " Delivered" by the 29th of April theyll deem it as lost and will accept a claim but i cant remeber when booking what the compensation amount was but i dont think it covers the amount of the item.  As it was my fault that it wasnt delivered in the first place can i trey and claim the full amount back ? i think if i remember correctly it was £50 compensation but the item was £170 So the timeline is thus ...   22nd Of March .    Booked via P2G & dropped off a Post Office.  25th March arrives in Singapore and goes through customs ect ect 26th   Incorrect address and item is flagged as "return to sender" 28th Item leaves Overseas intenational processing centre 15th of April , Item is leaving the Uk (Again)   ?    
    • Post the NTK up here for the regulars to double-check. I highly doubt it's compliant with POFA though. Ignore the deforestation that comes unless it's ever a letter of claim. Any luck with the organ grinder?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Schoolboy error by myself. e-bay.


SOD'EM
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3564 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys. I have a Samsung Galaxy S5 and thought it would be a good idea to get the Galaxy Gear (watch) to compliment it. I looked online and looked up the lates model. That was the Galaxy Gear 2. Looked at a few sites and found one that was reasonably priced and available from the Uk at £162.80. I looked at the specs on other websites previously, and seen that the Galaxy Gear 2 has a built in camera (my main reason for getting it), so I ordered it.

 

I recieved it today and noticed that this one has no camera. This is no fault of the seller because in his specs description, there is no mention of a camera. I had read there was a camera from another website. The model I have bought is the SM-R381, but the one I needed is the SM-R380. One number out. I know the returns laws are different for mobile devices, but do I have any chance of returning this. I have opened the box because all the boxes just say 'Galaxy Gear 2', and all look the same.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was it a business seller or personal seller?

If a business seller then the Distance Selling Regulations give you 7 days to return the product for a refund, even if opened, however since it's just a change of mind I think you would need to be liable for the cost of return postage if they have that in their terms and conditions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are a business but based in Hong Kong.

You should be able to return it but make sure they give you there UK address to return it to.

 

I think postage should be covered by you as its not there fault or yours, just a model number mix up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

The distance selling regs changed (this week I think) as you now have 14 days.

 

 

this from the ebay seller

 

Customer service is important to us. Please email us if you have any issues or before leaving negative feedback and we will try our best to rectify. For all returns queries, please email us via eBay Messaging System. We offer a 14 day no quibble returns policy. 1.0 - If you no longer want the product you purchased, kindly send an email from the eBay system. Please note the item has to be in its original condition as received and unopened. For security and health and safety reasons we will not be able to accept returns of products that have been used. 1.1 - If the item is faulty, we will give you an option to choose for a full refund or replacement item to be sent. 1.2 - Please note that the buyer is responsible for the cost of return postage in any instance if purchased in error. We will only refund or replace item that is returned back to us.

 

10% RE-STOCKING FEE APPLY - NO REFUND IF SEAL BROKEN !

 

they are not allowed to do this so if they refuse a full refund, raise the issue with Ebay. You will be responsible for the return postage costs though as it was bought in error

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Silverfox. They obviously have dispatches in UK as it was next day delivery. They say in their T's & C's if it is opened, they cannot refund. I have broke the seal because all Galaxy Gear 2's have the same box. It is only the sticker they apply to the box that differentiates the things inside. Looks like I could be stumped :(

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, that clause can be ignored. You have to be able to examine the goods so you have to break the seal. As soon as they state no refund, raise it with Ebay.

 

Email the seller saying you want to return it and they cannot refuse. The item must have been in the UK for it to be next day delivery. Any return address anywhere on the packaging?

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. The address is in Birmingham. Are you sue I can still return it after the seal is broken?

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. The address is in Birmingham. Are you sue I can still return it after the seal is broken?

 

You need to contact the seller first to explain your error and get them to agree a return. This covers you as if you just sent it back with no contact, they may return it to you. They may give you an RMA (a returns number and authorisation) with a returns address.

 

They cannot force you to send it back unopened. How are you supposed to examine the stuff if you cannot open it!

 

A thread from 2010

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?260962-Distance-Selling-Regulations-Return-of-Item-in-quot-as-new-quot-condition

 

From June this year, the regs changed slightly.

 

http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/regulation/consumer-contracts-regulations

 

and this

 

http://dshub.tradingstandards.gov.uk/dsrexplained

 

The statement saying no refunds is illegal.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is their reply to my returns quest. I have a feeling they are going to try and get out of this. They don't mention the seal, but do mention that it has to be not tampered with in any way.

 

'Dear Customer, It seems you bought wrong item, you bought the Galaxy GEAR 2 NEO which doesn't come with built-in camera. We would be happy to accept your return but the items must be in resalable condition with no damage, marks or scuffs and must be in the original packaging including the original manufacturer's box inserts, documentation, warranty cards, and all accessories. To warrant a full refund, do not, in any manner, tamper, mark, or deface original manufacturer's box. Our return address is: Dynamic-Express Unit 24 Bizspace Business Park Kings Road, Tyseley Birmingham B11 2AL Please mention your eBay I.D and reason for return. Best Regards '

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In other words - we will accept the item back with the seal broken. But the packaging must all be there and in resellable condition.

 

Looks like a result to me (as long as the packaging is not damaged or missing).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Everything is as it should be. Thanks guys. I will let you know how it goes.

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most established ebay sellers don't want a negative feedback so don't be too precious.

 

But - just in case - take some photos of the resellable condition of the item and the packaging. I am pretty sure you will never need them, but they will be good evidence if you need to raise a dispute with ebay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't forget. You want the total price paid in refund. Do not let them get off with the 10% restocking fee.

 

If you have any bubble wrap, use that and I agree with fully documenting the wrapping up of the parcel

 

Some people would say that proof of posting is enough. In this case I suggest special delivery as you can prove they received it

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

In correct re the DRS.

The DRS DOES NOT apply here as the DRS only applys to sales ON or BEFORE 12th June 2014. As of the 13th June the Consumer Contract regulations came into force.

 

Sod'em this is the which guide to the new laws. http://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/regulation/consumer-contracts-regulations

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, just recieved an unexpected response from the seller after paying £7.15 to return the item.

 

We received your return due to you intended to buy the camera version, but you returned the smartwatch with broken seal which breach our return condition therefore we extremely regret that we are unable to accept your return, would you please let us return the item back to you.

 

I sent them this. I hope I was right.

 

Thank you for your reply.

 

I had to break the seal to see that it was the wrong item. I have also took advice before sending it back to you. If you would like to check up all legal matters regarding Sales Of Goods Act, and Long Distance Selling Act, you will find that you haven't got a leg to stand on (regardless of your Terms & Conditions). If you refuse to refund me, I will have no alternative but to bring it up with ebay.

 

Regards

 

SOD'EM

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wouldn't bother responding. Just raise the case with Ebay.

 

Even though the seller is based abroad (with an outlet in the UK) they are selling to this market and as such have to abide by the regs. This distance selling regs are there for you to examine the goods to ensure they are right for you.

 

How can you examine without breaking the seal. Ruddy muppets.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a issue with a seller re a no refunds issue. l am getting my refund after issuing a claim.

OFT debt collection guidance

 

Please remember the only stupid question is the one you dont ask so dont worry about asking the stupid questions.

 

Essex girl in pc world looking 4 curtains 4 her pc,the assistant says u dont need curtains 4 a computer!!Essex girl says,''HELLOOO!! i,ve got WINDOWS!!'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will give them a couple of days to reply. I will then esculate the claim with ebay. Thanks all.

 

 

If all else fails, kick them where it hurts and SOD'EM;)

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

stuff ebay, go straight to a paypal dispute Was the item sent signed for? If not then you may well lose, whether paypal or ebay dispute as they require proof of delivery. The emails saying they have received it will come in useful later but dont mean much at the moment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...