Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • have a good read in the debt selfhelp forum. its easy to do a self managed one..only on the debts you find ARE enforceable mind..
    • If the legendary dx could offer his wisdom it would be greatly appreciated 
    • Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

1p cheque day


HD
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6151 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Not yet, but keep watching ;-)

 

I'm still not entirely convinced it's a good idea to be honest.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes - the downside appears to be that the process would be time consuming for the charities themselves, even though it would not cost them anything. A modification might be:

 

We decide on a date/time and a charity

We all go into the bank (hit a different bank on different days)

Fill in a paying in slip for one penny, and enter the charity's account details

Take to teller for processing...

 

In this way we (the cheesed off customer) can show our disdain for the bank, the charity gets money without being inconvenienced, and we all get our own small share of satisfaction...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see that would be a downside.

 

Would it be worth contacting some charities and explaining the plan. They could then decide whether processing costs would outweigh the benefit. Some charities would not wish to upset their bank if they were getting favourable terms from them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with that is that the bank may prove awkward on the BAG account...or may even refuse to process the cheques...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the suggestion about paying a single penny in at the branch would be a true example of 'consumer action'...and can you imagine the scene in the bank:

 

Me: I'd like to pay this money in please

Teller: What, one penny?

Me: Yes, one penny

Teller: Sorry sir, we can't process that amount

Me: Sorry, is there something wrong with coins of the realm?

Teller: No, it's just that this is too small an amount

Me: Sorry, you are able to process one penny's worth of interest on my account...

Teller: Yes, but that is deifferent

Me: In what way is it different?

Teller: It just is...sir...

Me: But this is a legitimate deposit...(loud voice)...AND IT'S FOR CHARITY!

Teller: Sorry sir, but we cannot accept that deposit

Me: (loud voice again) Well, that is disgusting...you won't accept donations to charity...I think I will write to the papers about this...

All other customers in the queue: Shame on you [bank], I may take my custom elsewhere

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hate to be a party pooper but I don't think that this campaign will work. Things like this always sound great and the people who organise them get very excited but this excitement is only matched by the disappointment when only a handful of people take part. If you remember there was a great deal of excitement over renewed fuel tax protests recently but the protestors were so few in number that they actually damaged rather than helped their cause.

 

Until CAG/ BAG is big enough and has the contacts to make its voice heard, I would suggest that individuals suing their banks and sending the bailiffs in (with local and national publicity), writing to local papers and MPs and spreading the word through personal contacts are all likely to have a bigger effect than a penny cheque day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wholeheartedly agree.

 

I think with a userbase of 13k - maybe 5% of people will actually write the cheque - amounting to about 6 quid for the charity - charities are not allowed to NOT accept any donations - this would probably cost them a lot more than the 6 quid they would 'gain'.

 

Also, I don't think that it's legal. We would effectively be causing willful damage, now while I cannot think of a law that covers this, I'm sure a bank with huge legal teams and unlimited funds could find one.

 

I also think it portrays the message "we can abuse the system, so we will." - and doesn't make for people (press included) taking the "overall" campaign very seriously.

 

The banks would probably just chuckle at a 1p cheque day.

 

I think if people want to 'hurt' the banks, then they should continue to tell everyone about this site, which ultimately leads people to getting their money back.

 

The banks already know that people are not happy with being charged - who would be?

 

The true way to show level of anger/feeling is to continue to challenge the banks and get your money back.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay...I agree.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What are the rules on paying a 'large sum' in one penny pieces? Considering that retail outlets do it all the time I should think that there isn't a law...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest stephen

there is no law against paying in a 1p cheque and it would not only be BAG it would be promoted in the National media for every body in the UK to join in.

Link to post
Share on other sites

From the Royal Mint website:

 

Q What is the legal tender amounts acceptable for the United Kingdom coins?

Legal tender has a very narrow and technical meaning in the settlement of debts. It means that a debtor cannot successfully be sued for non-payment if he pays into court in legal tender. It does not mean that any ordinary transaction has to take place in legal tender or only within the amount denominated by the legislation. Both parties are free to agree to accept any form of payment whether legal tender or otherwise according to their wishes. In order to comply with the very strict rules governing an actual legal tender it is necessary, for example, actually to offer the exact amount due because no change can be demanded.

 

The amounts for legal tender are stated below.

 

BANK OF ENGLAND NOTES:

 

In England and Wales the £5, £10, £20 and £50 notes are legal tender for payment of any amount. However, they are not legal tender in Scotland and Northern Ireland.

 

COINS:

 

Circulating coins are legal tender throughout the United Kingdom for the following amounts:

 

 

£2 - for any amount

 

£1 - for any amount

 

50p - for any amount not exceeding £10

 

25p (Crown) - for any amount not exceeding £10

 

20p - for any amount not exceeding £10

 

10p - for any amount not exceeding £5

 

5p - for any amount not exceeding £5

 

2p - for any amount not exceeding 20p

 

1p - for any amount not exceeding 20p

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

That is very interesting - the banks are only legally obliged to accept 20 one penny coins at a time...and it also seems to imply that unless previously agreed, the bank is not obliged to process multiple cheques of a penny either...

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest stephen

The idea is every person pays a cheque to the bank made payable to a charity, the rule about 1p x 20 is per person

I.e. I cannot write 20 cheques for 1p but my mate, uncle brother can all pay 1p cheque in to an account number.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I still don't like it.

 

I'm not convinced that the banks wouldn't see this as willful damage.

 

...because that's what it really is.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm with you on the whole bank charges are illegal and you should claim them all back but i have to say..

...1p cheque day would be a waste of time. (believe me I've had pay-ins for 1 pence a few times and it is always a laugh! :))

 

As already pointed out there are only 13,000 users on this board.

There are more than 14,000 banks in the UK (according to tv last night)

Even if all 13,000 from the forum all went into the bank and paid in a cheque for 1p this is less than one person per bank.

 

It would only take the teller 20 odd key presses and a matter of seconds to process this. (and if you'd already filled out the slip we wouldn't need to do anything at all!) Then the cheque and payinslip would be fired away with the rest of the days work where it is automatically scanned and processed at no extra cost to the banks.

 

As my flatmate has just pointed out I think you'd be more annoyed at having to stand in a queue for 10 minutes to do this in the first place than wasting a whole 15 seconds of the tellers time.

 

I once knew of a guy (think he had mental problems! :rolleyes: ) who insisted on paying in 20 £1 coins each as a seperate transaction and each of them had to have a different reference keyed to appear on his statement, that would have taken a bit more time (maybe 5-10 minutes??)

 

Then again as we offer a service I'd say the banks are within their rights to refuse to serve you if they so wish - this is not against the law as some people have said.

(Yes I work for a bank but am here to help! Please be nice to me! :))

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got to say - I agree.

 

I think it would be an embaressment to even try this.

 

It would not make the slightest bit of difference to the banks - all that would happen is a couple of hundred people (at best) would waste their time writing out a cheque and/or paying in a penny after queing for ages in a bank.

 

Nope - I think there are far more effective ways of letting the bank know you are fed up with their unlawful charging - taking the money back from them for one.

 

Writing to your MP for another.

 

Spreading the word of this site to everyone and anyone.

 

Ensuring that you don't get ripped off again, by ANYONE.

 

etc...etc...

 

I think maybe a petition would be a better idea. Let's wait and see what the OFT has to say when/if the banks do not comply with their request in a few weeks first though.

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fyou really want to annoy your bank write a cheque on the side of a cow and then pay it in. And yes it is legal. As long as the cow isn't stolen.

If you found this post useful please click on the scales above.

 

Egg - £400 - Prelim sent. On hold.

Mint - On the list Est £800

GE Capital - On the list (3 accounts!) Est £4000

 

MBNA - £545 Prelim sent 13/11/2006

LBA sent 1/12/2006

£350 partial payment received 18/12/2006.

Full settlement received 20/1/07

 

NatWest - Est £4000 not incl interest

Data Protection Act Sent 10/1/07

Statements received 24/1/07

Prelim sent 3/2/07

Full Settlement received 22/2/07

 

The contents of this post are the sole opinions of The Cornflake and not necessarily the opinions of any other members of this group. They do not constitute sound legal or financial advice and if in doubt you are advised to seek advice from a qualified professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Lueeze
That would be a good moo....ve! :lol:

 

Oh dear me thinks some people (no names mentioned:rolleyes: ) need a bit of time away from BAG!:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I fyou really want to annoy your bank write a cheque on the side of a cow and then pay it in. And yes it is legal. As long as the cow isn't stolen.

 

Yes you're right paying in a cheque written on a side of a cow (or anything else with your account number and sort code on it) is perfectly legal :) - I remember seeing it on "How 2" years ago (anyone remember that programme?)

That being said... banks are within their rights to refuse pay-ins and I think this is obviously what they'd do. Shame really it would have been fun!

(Yes I work for a bank but am here to help! Please be nice to me! :))

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6151 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...