Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

PI claim, how to do it?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3575 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Long story short,

 

Mother fell at 3 counties show ground on an uneven, unmetalled car park, and broke her arm in the fall, the top of her humerus of all places.

 

She is self employed as a mobile hairdresser, so has been unable to drive or do any hairdressing for the last 8 weeks, and has only just begun physio.

 

She is wanting to sue the ground, and is wanting to use a NWNF parasite that you see touting for business on the goggle box.

 

Is this the best route for her to follow?

 

I've told her to look in her home insurance policy, and car insurance to see if there is anything in the small print that might actually fund a private solicitor, rather than a NWNF one which I despise...

 

Any thoughts or ideas?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A "private" solicitor might be willing to take on the case under a conditional fee agreement, you'll have to ask around. They should also advise on ATE insurance to cover their fees if your mother lost the case. However I believe the premium for the ATE insurance and the solicitor's success fee is no longer recoverable from the other side if you win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks SV, spoke to her today and she is more angry than anything, angry that they (3 counties showground) haven't been in contact to see if she is alright.

 

I can understand her anger and frustration, even though they were aware of her injury, as they called the ambulance from their own first aid facility, they have washed their hands it so to speak.

 

So I have told her to wait out on anything rash, such as these NWNF vultures and she agrees partly due to the fact that have been quite agressive over the phone, ''a classic parasite mum, only interested in money'' so safe to say she is going to leave them well alone for the time being, and allow me to rattle a few cages first, as all she really wanted was a quick call/letter to ask if she was ok?

 

So I'm going to try and see what I can't do first, after all it is only 8 weeks since she fell and broke her arm, so still feeling a little raw..

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many local and national solicitor's firms have PI practices that will take on cases on a NWNF basis. You don't necessarily have to go through a PI claims factory. Many of the businesses you see touting on google etc. don't actually run the case themselves but are referral businesses that will refer cases to firms in exchange for a commission.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Long story short,

 

Mother fell at 3 counties show ground on an uneven, unmetalled car park, and broke her arm in the fall, the top of her humerus of all places.

 

She is self employed as a mobile hairdresser, so has been unable to drive or do any hairdressing for the last 8 weeks, and has only just begun physio.

 

She is wanting to sue the ground, and is wanting to use a NWNF parasite that you see touting for business on the goggle box.

 

Is this the best route for her to follow?

 

I've told her to look in her home insurance policy, and car insurance to see if there is anything in the small print that might actually fund a private solicitor, rather than a NWNF one which I despise...

 

Any thoughts or ideas?

 

Why all the hatred and what is wrong with NWNF? It's a great way for people who can't afford to pay for a solicitor to get access to justice.

 

Just search on Google for a personal injury solicitor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers SP, will let her know.

 

The trouble with NWNF firms Gany is that they are like vultures cicrling around the high street in the most deprived areas touting for business to line their pockets,

I couldn't go anywhere near me without some spotty faced clown following me up the road, ''We do a NWNF Sir, we can claim thousands for your accident sir'' All because I was on crutches, even better when they approached a friend of mine who had lost his leg in Iraq, they couldn't pack up quick enough..

 

I simply despise them for the way they conduct themselves, worse than a double glazing con man...

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're coming across as a bit ignorant and prejudiced if I'm honest.

 

If you had checked then you'll probably find that, as SP said, they will not be solicitors but Claims Management Companies. However as referral fees are now illegal this practice should start reducing and these dodgy companies that give the profession a bad name will cease to exist.

 

I don't agree with CMCs chasing people down the street but see nothing wrong with legitimate law firms advertising their legal services or people being encouraged to enforce their legal rights in tort.

 

Many hundreds of respectable law firms, from niche high street practices to multi national companies offer a NWNF service as it is an excellent form of funding usually very expensive litigation.

 

Just because a NWNF service of funding a compensation claim is offered should make no difference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...