Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Marlin/Shoosmiths Summary Cause - old LloydsTsb loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 1864 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Bit of a disaster.

Decree had already been given.

Why?

Because the 10th july was an industrial action day and couldn't hand in defence until 11th.

 

Despite being only a day late and expressing intent to defend, pursuant went straight for decree. Was so annoyed!

 

The clerk initially told me the pursuant would have to agree to the decree being removed and setting a new date.

 

Eventuality she called them to explain and they agreed and sent an email to confirm which I have a copy of.

 

A few words of the scene.

I imagined us all sitting round a table in an informal situation.

Not so.

 

It will be held in a courtroom in front of all other cases being heard.

Will need nerves of steel.

However, despite the fact I felt quite prepared, this gives me time to be super prepared.

 

Also, hubby doesn't need to be there, just need to send a letter to court stating fact I will be representing him, which is fine.

 

Exhausted!

 

Thanks for support Andy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Bit of breathing space then Tesis time to peruse the above:wink:

  • Confused 1

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

That made me laugh but not in a nasty way, already have it ... great minds and all that! Printed off and filed in my ever increasing reference library. Please don't stop sending me anything you find though, or pointing me in the right direction, would've given up ages ago without support. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi, had my breather. Since last posting I received a letter from Shoosmiths regarding the CPR request to say they were looking into it. Think I received it on 26th July. Need to know if and when I should respond to their limited response regarding CPR31.14 and total lack of response to the s77 request. Have received no documents to either request. In all honesty, I would prefer not to take this to court if I can avoid it. What do I do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, still heard nothing from solicitors and don't imagine I will.

I am thinking of lodging an incidental application to sist the case.

 

I am at pains to make sure my work know nothing of this and it's very difficult to get time off without good reason hence the reason I'd rather avoid unnecessary court appearances, especially if it's going to be a waste of everyone's time.

 

I don't think any firm decisions can be made until all the documents are available and more than likely another date will be given for documents to be recovered.

 

If possible I'd like to avoid the time wasting by sisting the case meantime.

What do you think?

Apparently I can do this anytime before the sitting.

(Advice taken from the above)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes that is an option...you understand that the sheriff is not compelled to accept the application to sist...so you need to word it correctly and purvey in the interest of costs and court time why you are making the application.....no response to your requests etc.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to let you know I found another document "The Summary Cause 4. Going to Court" which may be helpful to others reading this thread. https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/rules-and-practice/guidance-notes/summary-cause-guidance-notes. Good information about what to expect. I'm going to phone the Sheriff Clerk in the morning to get advice about the Incidental Application. According to these notes it's pretty straightforward but need to give two days notice prior to the hearing which is Thursday.

 

These documents are good too: Section 8 Defended Action and Section 9 Incidental Applications and Sists:

 

https://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/rules-and-practice/rules-of-court/sheriff-court---civil-procedure-rules/summary-cause-rules.

 

Just in case anyone needs advice pertaining to Scotland.

 

I'll tell you this much, it's all very wearying, got nothing but admiration for you folks that continue to give the support you do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best of luck Tesis ...sure you will fine and come out smiling.

 

Let us know what transpires ...good or bad.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just back, quick update.

The pursuers requested the case be sisted to allow them time to recover the documents.

I said I was reluctant to let the case be sisted due to the stress of the situation and would like it to be decided one way or another.

 

The judge said I would have to be prepared to defend the case and I think I would have had to state my defence there and then which without the documents I couldn't do.

He was lovely, so were we.

He was understanding and explained everything.

 

I said I didn't want it to go on indefinitely and he agreed and said I was at liberty to request the case be heard at a later date through and incidental application. I was nervous and wish I had put forward my defence re: the total cost of credit not being declared which I have on my customer's copy of the agreement. I do intend to take the case forward through this incidental application at a later date. Meantime, the case has been sisted.

 

 

I would urge everyone to take their cases the full way.

Get prepared and go for it.

There is no doubt the court situation appears daunting but the judge we had today was very understanding.

 

I also noted that everyone who defended themselves and presented their heartfelt but simple cases were found in favour, including one wee girl who just stood there without a folder of paperwork and just said it how it was.

Was very enlightening.

 

 

Thanks for support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

After over 4 and a half years I’ve received a response in the post from Shoosmiths. Do I need to do anything? I should’ve replied by today but I haven’t. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have included a copy of original agreement, statements and default notice.

If I can pay in full their client is happy to have the sist in place with the court action removed and dismissed.

 

There is an option to fill out an Income and Expenditure form etc If I can’t pay in full, the payment arrangement will be subject to a decree being obtained against me. If I fail to make the payments their client may proceed to enforce the decree. ( a bit about consequences of a decree)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't know why I never saw this thread...

can you scan up their docs to ONE multipage PDF

and drop and drag to the paperclip please

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you read upload and convert that to PDF please and rotate it.

 

dx

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Marlin/Shoosmiths Summary Cause - old LloydsTsb loan

I also mean the agreement and all the docs.

 

when did you last pay this please?

it is also worthy to note, if it were not for the claim the debt would now be extinguished.

 

title clarified and moved to the Scotland forum.

 

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last paid in 2011

 

I’ve kept all the files/letters from 4 years ago and have everything before that. I have the original agreement. It would take a while to put up all that I have so realistically it would need to be Saturday before I had the time to do that. Is that ok?

 

Do I need to be worried? Genuinely thought this was over. If the decree had been issued at the time, wouldn’t it be nearly over?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no a decree is 20yrs.

it looks to me like a threat-o-gram as it doesnt say will anything.

however as you didn't get an incidental application in you've left the door open

yes they could carry on.

 

which is why we needs to see all the documents they have sent you that they intend to rely upon IF they continue the claim.

ofcourse you like wise via an IA can object 

but we need to see the cards they are playing with.

 

I will assume the sheriff gave no time limit on the sist which is what you should have insisted upon.

 

if you read upload

it tells you how to use a camera and redact photos as a jpg before converting and merging to one multipage pdf

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn’t get anything in writing from anywhere after the court case

 

. I did bring it up that this had caused great stress and I didn’t want it to go on forever but I can’t remember what was said.

Perhaps there are court notes I could ask for.

 

they have said in the letter they have included the default notice.

 

Believe me when I say I keep EVERYTHING and I don’t have it either.

 

I have the letters from the bank at the time but no default notice.

 

However, it is ‘the bank’ so they probably did send it and it’s something I’ve misplaced. Just strange it’s not in the docs they’ve sent.

 

I’ve copied the docs they’ve sent and redacted names and ref numbers but there are dates/amounts. I’m paranoid about being identified. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to be...

 

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...