Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Awaiting Eviction date - ** SUSPENDED **


andrew0101
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2632 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I haven't got the email..........

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi, got the email - but you haven't done a statement yet? or budget sheet. Have you looked at the guide at the top of the repossession forum or the other threads I gave you links to in post 47? -

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok :)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have replied (2 emails)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have got the email and replied, but we need to sort the budget sheet

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I hope this can act as some help to others now after my experience yesterday. I had my court hearing to suspend the eviction warrant. Despite over £13k of arrears and not one penny paid since February this year, the building society sent a barrister who told the Judge a very damning story of borrowers whom quite clearly did not take their mortgage commitments seriously and should be evicted next Wednesday under the terms of the warrant.

 

The Judge without hesitation after this suspended the warrant given that the statement on the N244 clearly showed that the mortgage was affordable and that the offer to clear the arrears fell in line and indeed was in excess of the case law of Cheltenham and Gloucester vs Norgan. The advice that I have received on this site has been invaluable and I am grateful to all who have helped me through this difficult time.

 

 

I do however have to go back to court again in January as the Judge wants to relook at our expenditure once the loan on my wife's car ends with a view to increasing the payments to clear the arrears. This does cause some problems as I have done some figures already and given that we would need to buy a car (with no money) and also pay for after school club for both children in order for me to work, plus the cost of a season ticket for my wife to get to work plus a bus as well, would actually mean that our monthly outgoings would be higher than they are now....I guess this is a bridge that I will need to cross in January at the hearing, but am hoping that so long as payments are made in line with the court order yesterday he will take a fairly lenient view?

 

I do have one further question now....I have no paperwork as yet regarding yesterdays hearing and assume that I will not need to contact the bailiffs office re the eviction next Wednesday as that will be an internal matter for the court the do? If they were to turn up on Wednesday I imagine that I would just have to refer them back to the court to get the order that was imposed yesterday and that would be good enough?

Edited by citizenB
formatting
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done :) glad you got a decent judge. You should receive the court order in the post early next week - the court will have informed the bailiff office of the suspension of the warrant. You could always ring the court on Monday and check.

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope this can act as some help to others now after my experience yesterday. I had my court hearing to suspend the eviction warrant. Despite over £13k of arrears and not one penny paid since February this year, the building society sent a barrister who told the Judge a very damning story of borrowers whom quite clearly did not take their mortgage commitments seriously and should be evicted next Wednesday under the terms of the warrant.

 

The Judge without hesitation after this suspended the warrant given that the statement on the N244 clearly showed that the mortgage was affordable and that the offer to clear the arrears fell in line and indeed was in excess of the case law of Cheltenham and Gloucester vs Norgan. The advice that I have received on this site has been invaluable and I am grateful to all who have helped me through this difficult time.

 

 

I do however have to go back to court again in January as the Judge wants to relook at our expenditure once the loan on my wife's car ends with a view to increasing the payments to clear the arrears. This does cause some problems as I have done some figures already and given that we would need to buy a car (with no money) and also pay for after school club for both children in order for me to work, plus the cost of a season ticket for my wife to get to work plus a bus as well, would actually mean that our monthly outgoings would be higher than they are now....I guess this is a bridge that I will need to cross in January at the hearing, but am hoping that so long as payments are made in line with the court order yesterday he will take a fairly lenient view?

 

I do have one further question now....I have no paperwork as yet regarding yesterdays hearing and assume that I will not need to contact the bailiffs office re the eviction next Wednesday as that will be an internal matter for the court the do? If they were to turn up on Wednesday I imagine that I would just have to refer them back to the court to get the order that was imposed yesterday and that would be good enough?

 

When you return in January, just ensure that you have an updated budget sheet with you - I would think that the Judge would recognise travel costs are a necessary part of the budget - if you cant get to work, then you would not be able to repay what you are !

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having now done the maths I can prove to the court that losing my wife's car will infact mean that our income will not be able to comply with the court order made on the 8th October.....Thus if the judge wants to vary the order to make us pay more each month it will mean we can' t afford what he has ordered in the first place....I guess that leaves him in a difficult position and one he had not thought of whilst making the order!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to pry but surely the end of the loan on your wife's car leaves her with a car and no loan payments. How is this going to make you worse off in January?

 

 

And also you have previously told the Judge that you have arranged childcare with friends, but now you are saying it has to be paid for?

 

 

To be honest Andrew I think it leaves you in a difficult position, not the Judge! You need to be consistent with what you have said at this month's hearing.

 

 

He has been very generous in the circumstances. I would be hesitant in going back in January to try and prove that the Judge was 'wrong' in October!!

 

 

I would move heaven and earth to make the payments you have been told to make and come up with a plan to pay a little more in January.

 

 

Trying to be 'clever' is going to land you in a lot of trouble if the next Judge is not as sympathetic! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I returned to court for a review on the 7th of Jan with my amended budgets as per my above post. The hearing lasted less than five minutes as the Judge could see that I had made payments as per the order made in October and felt that it was correct to keep things as they were given the changes I had detailed....warrant now fully suspended and no more action.....the post made by Born this way was extremely unhelpful especially with no knowledge of anything and very disappointing that posts like that are allowed....fortunately I knew my case and stuck with it

Link to post
Share on other sites

I returned to court for a review on the 7th of Jan with my amended budgets as per my above post. The hearing lasted less than five minutes as the Judge could see that I had made payments as per the order made in October and felt that it was correct to keep things as they were given the changes I had detailed....warrant now fully suspended and no more action.....the post made by Born this way was extremely unhelpful especially with no knowledge of anything and very disappointing that posts like that are allowed....fortunately I knew my case and stuck with it

 

 

Good that you have had a good result.

 

The 'problem' with any forum is that others will give differing opinions and it is down to you to accept or reject the opinion. As it is, you stuck to your guns and got the result. Your finances are nobodies business but your own (unless of course you decide to share)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's good news, you must be very relieved. I hope you found the forum helpful :)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andrew your original post implied that you were going to 'prove' to the Judge that you should be paying less than the original Judge requested, and the issue of you being worse off when your Wife had managed to pay off her car did not make sense.

 

 

I urged caution about trying to 'point score' to prove the original Judge wrong and that you should make the payments as prescribed. Which is what you have done, so I don't understand your original post.

 

 

BTW it has not 'gone away' you have a suspended possession order and it will rear its head again if you so much as slip up by a £1 on your payment.

 

 

I was not trying to upset you, I was giving you the benefit of my experience in these matters. I was perfectly polite so grizzling that you wanted my post removed was rather unnecessary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The point I was trying to get across was this. Once the loan on my wife's car was paid off, the car would go back to the finance company and she would have no transport. Having then done the maths public transport and childcare over and above friends looking after the children would actually exceed the car loan cost and we would have been worse off than with the car loan....fortunately, this Judge saw that so it worked out well, the previous judge I think, was pro banks, this one, I think, more human and not so in favour of the mighty financial institutions flexing their muscles....hope this clears up any misunderstanding

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

It appears lenders are becoming more desperate to repossess as evidenced with one challenging an order made by a district judge and asking for leave to appeal which was declined, although I believe that does not end the process and the lender can apply for leave to appeal. BEWARE.....when you think it's all over it isn't necessarily so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

So the six years is up on the SPO arrears are being cleared but the BS wants to continue with an SPO so applies to the court for an extension....the judge grants it as a paperwork exercise, but then the BS attempt to flex their muscles by sticking in an application for possession....clearly this is an error so the judge who looks at their paperwork orders a hearing and reserved it for himself....well sometimes there is comedy in these matters....a buffooning barrister not really knowing what the BS wanted him to achieve, a judge who was not happy at the courts fime being wasted and me....the end result was an embarrassed barrister, a judge who said the barrister "the clues in the word suspended or do in need to get you a dictionary" and a little wink from the judge on way out.....a good day in court

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh that is brilliant !

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...